Theory on paperbound books extinction, page 7


Pages: <<  4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 40 times


reply posted on 15-4-2012 @ 08:36 PM by optimus primal
reply to post by pheonix358



oh no! you'll have to do your own spellchecking and editing!

it's a way to get your books out there, make more money doing it, get a wider audience, and not have to go through the paper publishing industry.
just like paper books, there are some ebooks that aren't worth the money. it's no different. people like your work,they buy it, they don't and they wont.

i've found spelling and grammatical errors in paper published books many a time.


reply posted on 15-4-2012 @ 08:56 PM by optimus primal
Originally posted by pheonix358
How many times have you gone through their index. 100,00 book titles.

We have all found the odd error in printed media, they are the odd error.

With all due respect, you have not looked deeply into this issue. It is not 'some of those e-books are pretty bad', it is that a huge chunk are absolute crap. I know, I've looked into it. When an author starts off with saying 'Welcome to the new age of publishing where spelling is a variable thing like mother nature,' you know your in for a wild ride!

It is easy to get caught up in the hype. When you have a good work and you have an idea of how the publishing industry works you have to be a little more cautious. As I have said, the times are a changing. There are deep problems on both sides of the fence.

P

with all due respect you didn't even know you could make money from publishing ebooks a page back. you researched it well enough to have a distinct opinion in 10 minutes?! you are amazing. if such a "huge chunk" were absolute crap, they wouldn't be making any money on online bookselling sites. you know where the problems come in with ebooks and terrible spellings with bad scans? google books. all sorts of scan errors and transpositions like ! for l. i have 200 or so ebooks, very few of them have any errors or mispellings in them. less than 10 if i recall correctly. buy from reputable books sellers like barnes and noble or amazon(for kindle), read the reviews see if the digital copy has errors.



also, what sides? there is no either or in this. there is nothing saying :"buy physical books or buy digital, you can't have both".



reply posted on 15-4-2012 @ 09:05 PM by Thaxter
reply to post by MarksThoughts



Good points. However, the democratization of information would be for digital bits only. The beauty of real books lies in their very physical properties. Some here have mentioned the smell of books. Others like the rustling made by turning the paper pages. I like typography, the way words are designed to fall on a page, how the initial capital in a chapter can be ten times larger than the others, and nestled into the first paragraph.

I like graphic design. I like illustrations that you can study in detail. I like how real books are *coherent* in their form, functionality, and beauty.

Digitization of texts is inevitable, of course, but my point is that our culture itself is dependent upon unified bodies of work. A Nook book jsut doesn't give the whole picture . . . it gives only a tiny digital bit at one time. I actually really dislike reading things on the Nook, and now use it only for a book that I would have no intention of keeping. So, digital ereaders to me are much like reading on the internet . . . fleeting, ephemeral, and messy. The books in my home are rock solid and they are permanent, home to stay, part of my life, real cultural tangibles that have formed who I am.

I feel badly for kids who are NOT checking out real books, and enjoying the complete coherence and unified presentation that a physical book gives. Books are cultural entities that when consumed expand the mind of the reader.

Digital archives are fine in theory, and probably highly functional. But no one really likes to read digital text for very long. It's hard the eyes. And if kids don't learn to read full-length books (because they read everything digitally) then we will have generation after generation of progressively more coarse, illiterate, and passive people. They have not bothered to expose their minds to the rich complexities of long books of imagination, thus, they will lack imagination, clarity of reasoning, and the ability to see larger pictures, or a kind of thinking in landscape, as novels, for example, teach. The really troubling thing about the situation with ebooks is that I fear we are losing a generation of younger people who simply cannot be bothered to consume an entire book digitally when they can game, chat, text, email, post on Facebook, etc., etc. Why read a whole book? There's a world of fun online . . . thus, I think the real tragedy is in decreasing literacy, and especially, the decline of even basic writing skills.

edit on 15-4-2012 by Thaxter because: Corrected grammar.



reply posted on 15-4-2012 @ 09:22 PM by optimus primal
Originally posted by pheonix358


The other point no one has mentioned is this. I am an author. How do I get paid for my book if I publish in E-book. The publishing industry does not yet have an answer to this riddle.
P


that doesn't look like you've researched it for many years. ( if you were being sarcastic in the quoted post, perhaps you should have added /sarcasm, otherwise i take you at your word as it's typed)

no not every person who publishes an ebook is going to make it rich, or even a moderate amount of money. your work has to be good, people have to want to read it. it's the same way with traditional publishing, only you have to convince the publisher that it's good and people will want to read it, rather than letting the people themselves decide.

traditional publishing is going to get edged out....unless they drastically restructure they way they go about their business. similar to the recording industry. it's not an if, but a when.
it's not something to be feared or mocked.

people will always want physical books, or physical CDs. and there's nothing wrong with that, likewise is there nothing wrong with wanting your media in digital format. it can be protected as well or better than physical media, contrary to what some think. i like physical books better for reading, but as i said earlier, i just don't have the space anymore, ebooks fullfill my need to read and my space requirements, i can also browse all 20k+ books at B&N.com and read whatever strikes my fancy 10 seconds later...beats driving to their store, looking for 20 minutes only to find out they have to order it from their warehouse and it will take a week.


reply posted on 15-4-2012 @ 10:52 PM by kawika
Old paper books are so cheap, no way to make a living.

www.abebooks.com... 51&sts=t&x=22&y=17

Unless you deal in rare books or first editions, not worth the effort.

As far as new books, sometimes I will preview a book electronically and then order a paper copy to read.

I prefer paper.

Also have lots of "in case SHTF" books here, in paper.

They are so heavy though. I used to go on trips, liked to take study books, but too heavy to do that now. Airlines got wise.

Another little known thing about paper books. Post office has a "media" rate. Cheap way to ship heavy books.


reply posted on 16-4-2012 @ 12:59 AM by intrptr
reply to post by beezzer


451 degrees is the temperature that paper ignites at...

When the power goes out, you can...

go outside...
start a conversation...
or read a book...

I got a ton of books.


reply posted on 16-4-2012 @ 09:24 AM by blupblup
reply to post by TheLoony





That looks kinda like mine man.... add to that two cases of dvds and 3 more shelves of dvds and graphic novels




I am slowly trimming down my collection but still....


I like your mums style




reply posted on 16-4-2012 @ 05:32 PM by AK907ICECOLD
reply to post by deltaalphanovember



This is one of the directions I was looking for in responses to my thread, Star!

Now I'm not saying that books will be gone in 2-3 years, but a technology gains speed
other tech if left behind. Which could be a good thing in the long future of the human race
if held onto, I'm thinking 1000-2000 years later.

Thanks for the extra info


reply posted on 16-4-2012 @ 05:34 PM by AK907ICECOLD
reply to post by TheLoony



Damn those hoarders, can't they share anything.. I really
wish that I had a collection like that. Need a bigger house
and a bigger bookshelves.

Good pictures friend
edit on 16-4-2012 by AK907ICECOLD because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 16-4-2012 @ 05:38 PM by AK907ICECOLD
reply to post by JiggyPotamus



Not computers, but maybe a lost type of tech that held storage that was lost, the lost "info," I mean

I like your reply, Thanks


reply posted on 22-4-2012 @ 05:28 AM by Wide-Eyes
reply to post by blupblup



Youmake a very good point, looking at the trends of the music industry. However, all music formats are still a very recent media. Books have been around for millenia, I think it will be a much, much longer period before they are phased out.
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



Dumbing down reality
  Posted 5 days ago with 103 member flags
The 800 Pound Gorilla Everyone Ignores
  Posted 16 days ago with 67 member flags
The Illusion of Choice and Truth
  Posted 10 days ago with 52 member flags
A chronical of the BANKSTER WARS
  Posted 7 days ago with 42 member flags
Conspiracy Theory:The Lost Episode
  Posted 4 days ago with 39 member flags
666, NWO, Aliens and You!
  Posted 13 days ago with 36 member flags