Disclose.TV has been seized!, page 1

Originally posted by BIHOTZ
reply to post by redoubt

Forget search.

dude the other thread about this is still on the first page of recent posts. It is clearly explained there why this is not true.

If I tossed out every topic that someone here called a hoax (including those of ATS itself), there's be nothing left to read.

So, you'll have to excuse me for chasing this one down by going to the website myself, directly, and using several avenues of approach to disclosure.tv before rolling down the ATS rabbit hole.

Have a nice day, dood

reply posted on 14-4-2012 @ 01:27 PM by grubblesnert

Originally posted by Hkkoru
This made me freak. Is it really a protest, or did it happen? I need to know D:

I see your from Canada. No problem with that. You guys up there are OK with me. I only point this out to show The United States is not your main country of concern, lawwise, rightswise, constitutionwise etc.

A cursory glance by anyone that knows US laws and policies involving the internet, freedom of speech and due process should get this reaction>>>>> This is a notice put up by the owners of the sight, in the same vein as the mock official goverment notice put up by ATS not so long ago,
The point being to shock the typical unaware internet user into discussion and out of complacency. To get people talking (like we are doing right now) and hopefully learning and then, perhaps, involved in action.

Of course I could be totally wrong and we could all be screwed!

But I doubt it

reply posted on 14-4-2012 @ 01:35 PM by BIHOTZ

reply to post by redoubt

well I never.........

LOL

whatever dude. You could just contribute to that one. I never said you shouldn't do what you want to.

so what about the other information offered made it official ATS endorsed information? A fellow user/ users explained what they found and you could verify it. I did. I concur. I could have made a whole new thread about it but considering the size of ATS we need to be sparing with posts and threads and make use of every bit we put out. It is must be a pain in the ass to organize this all. Especially if we all make duplicate threads to "verify" findings.

reply posted on 14-4-2012 @ 01:36 PM by BrainGarden

hey guys, long time no post!
DTV is going through growing pains,I believe. I dont see them
posting anything there to get net-isided.(mods)
I hope that this is the big opening for DISCLOSE TV 2.0 !
Its been a great place for lnfo and entertainment for a long time,
their are shills and trolls just like here, just like everywhere
But, I love the place. and if they've been run through by the
sword of silence ...Its time we all took a look around.

Peace to you. THE BRAINGARDEN.

reply posted on 14-4-2012 @ 01:47 PM by Arrowmancer

Please copy and paste this to all additional threads on the issue.

1. There is no position in the US for 'Terror Attorney'. Anywhere. Much less in Maryland.
2. 23 USC (cited by the picture) is for Highway regulation.
3. In the above link, there is no section #981 or #714 in 23 USC. It stops at Chapter 6.
4. There is no European Allied Command Operations.
5. The US cannot seize German property (I think that's where their servers are based?)
6. The logo is too friggin cool in the center top. That is perhaps the best looking logo I've ever seen on a USG site.
7. There is NO "International Website Seizure Act". A google search for the term will lead you only to articles concerning the disclose page.
8. "Terror-mongering" is not a term that would be used by the USG in an official written capacity as it is not sterile and implies judgement.

reply posted on 14-4-2012 @ 02:40 PM by wonderworld

It’s true that there has been a steep increase in Militia’s in the US. Coincidentally Obama passed a law for a National State of Emergency that must have went under the radar. I don’t know whats up with Disclose TV but it will be interesting to find out.

reply posted on 14-4-2012 @ 07:06 PM by Anon009

www.examiner.com...

Link to examiner article seems to indicate that the seizures were real

reply posted on 14-4-2012 @ 07:27 PM by kennethmd

Originally posted by Anon009
www.examiner.com...

Link to examiner article seems to indicate that the seizures were real

I have read it and they don't know if it real or not.

reply posted on 15-4-2012 @ 04:41 AM by ImaJWalker

Textreply to post by zroth

My favorite is rt.com

Post alternatives for the 'biased media' so we can all find the 'truth' Please and thanking you in advance.

reply posted on 15-4-2012 @ 05:18 AM by zeetroyman

just remove seized at the end of the URL and it works fine.

Just tested a few vids on the site and all working fine.

reply posted on 15-4-2012 @ 05:21 AM by blupblup

reply to post by fuzzy0087

Works perfectly well.

www.disclose.tv...

It was a revamp/joke/warning kinda thing.

ATS had a similar warning up a while back... scared the crap outta people then too