It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Obama Lawyer Admits Forgery but disregards “image” as Indication of Obama’s Ineligibility Dama

page: 29
64
<< 26  27  28    30  31  32 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 16 2012 @ 05:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by spoor

Originally posted by timetothink
Your proof?


James Buchanan and Chester Alan Arthur

You also ignore the fact that Obama lost his dual citizenship in 1983....


James Buchanan’s father came to America in the early 1780′s, becoming a ‘citizen of the United States at the Adoption of the Constitution’. James was born in the United States in 1791.

And Chester Allan Arthur had to hide his birthright, which has been proven (simply google it) in order to obtain presidency.

and I have acknowledged that Obama was 22 when he lost his dual citizenship, but natural born has to be at birth... hence the born part!
edit on 16-4-2012 by Jameela because: (no reason given)




posted on Apr, 16 2012 @ 05:36 AM
link   
You are wrong:




His mother Elizabeth Speer was born in Pennsylvani. His father James Buchanan emigrated to the United States from Ireland in 1783. It was an interesting year for the United States as the Treaty of 1783 was signed between the US and Great Britain. Colonists chose to be United States citizens and by virtue of the Treaty, Great Britain recognized those former subjects as United States citizens. Before the Constitution, United States citizenship was conferred on citizens by the States. When the Constitution was ratified, each citizen of a state became a citizen of the United States. No formal naturalization was needed. On June 21, 1788 the Constitution was ratified. The Buchanans were citizens of Pennsylvania and therefore James Sr. was a citizen of the United States. When James Jr. was born in Pennsylvania he was therefore a natural born citizen, born on United States soil to two US citizen parents.
reply to post by spoor
 

www.peoplespassions.org...



posted on Apr, 16 2012 @ 05:40 AM
link   
reply to post by timetothink
 


What do you not understand?

James Buchanan? Chester Arthur?



posted on Apr, 16 2012 @ 05:53 AM
link   
I will have to do more research, but it is possible that I was wrong.. I found something stating that Obama may still have dual citizenship with both Britain and the United States, while at the age of 22 his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired, he may still hold one for Britain because that may have to be renounced in writing, as it does not expire.

I will look into this more fully to determine this matter.

www.thepostemail.com...


edit on 16-4-2012 by Jameela because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 16 2012 @ 06:02 AM
link   
reply to post by timetothink
 


Quoting yet another lying birther website huh?

Funny how they always screw these things up in the same way.

What the courts actually said was that, the treaty of 1783 alone is not enough to make a British citizen an American citizen.



posted on Apr, 16 2012 @ 06:12 AM
link   
reply to post by captainnotsoobvious
 


According to who?

This question has long since ceased to be of any importance as bearing upon any property rights, and in so far as it relates to whether State citizenship antedated national citizenship, it makes no difference which date is assumed to be correct; for the relations of the States to the federal compact were substantially the same in 1776 as in 1783.

www.constitution.org...



posted on Apr, 16 2012 @ 06:14 AM
link   
reply to post by Jameela
 


Obama is not a dual citizen

hansard.millbanksystems.com...


Mr. Paget I am grateful to my right hon. Friend for that very charming way of giving way. Although it is perfectly true that this may not have been immediately contemplated by Lord Butler in 1962, when we came to the Kenya Independence Act and when we promised Asians that they could retain their British citizenship as protection, surely it was fully recognised? §Mr. Callaghan If my hon. and learned Friend had waited for the next paragraph he would have found that I do recognise this. When the Commonwealth Immigration Act was passed in 1962 the inhabitants of Kenya—all of them, including Asians—became subject to our control. The Asians—became subject to control at that time, but when Kenya became independent in 1963 people born in Kenya and whose fathers were born there, among others, obtained local citizenship automatically and ceased to be citizens of the United Kingdom and Colonies. A number of Asians obtained citizenship under that provision. The remainder had a right to citizenship on application within two years, but many did not apply. After the expiry of two years there is provision for the grant of local citizenship at discretion, but there is no right to it. The effect of these provisions has been that a large number of Asians in Kenya, either through choice or through inadvertence, did not acquire Kenya citizenship and in consequence retained their citizenship of the United Kingdom and Colonies.


The text of the Kenya Independence Act:

www.legislation.gov.uk...


edit on 16-4-2012 by captainnotsoobvious because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 16 2012 @ 06:21 AM
link   
reply to post by Jameela
 


What according to who?

If you're wondering what court and what case said that, I'll repay your "favour" and not quote my source... You learn so much more when you do your own research, versus simply copying and pasting from erroneous birther websites.



posted on Apr, 16 2012 @ 07:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by timetothink
Just remember, now that the precedent has been achieved, the next uneligible president elected may not be on the side of those that allowed Obama in to office. Good luck.


And that is it in a nut shell,

Odd how people go out of their way to pledged their allegiance to something that is wicked, when push comes to shove they are going to go down with the rest of us, perhaps fall even harder.
edit on 073030p://bMonday2012 by Stormdancer777 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 16 2012 @ 08:03 AM
link   
reply to post by Stormdancer777
 


That's rich.

Birthers are simply spreading dishonest political propaganda, like this thread.

How you've convinced yourself debunking political propaganda is a BAD thing is beyond me.



posted on Apr, 16 2012 @ 08:45 AM
link   
reply to post by captainnotsoobvious
 



And you are not?, it is not just a Birth certificate issue, you have to look at the bigger picture, anyone who is so passionately anti truth-seeking, has nothing in common with me.

I know how this works continue to insult me to get me to give up and shut up.


edit on 083030p://bMonday2012 by Stormdancer777 because: E lauhoe mai na wa'a; i ke ka, i ka hoe; i ka hoe, i ke ka; pae aku i ka 'aina



posted on Apr, 16 2012 @ 09:10 AM
link   
reply to post by Stormdancer777
 


Paranoid much?

Just because THIS truth isn't found in some crackpot conspiracy doesn't mean much about ALL "truth".

You seem to think that truth has to be the opposite of whatever the accepted mainstream belief is, but of course that's just as close-minded as any "sheeple".

If you were ACTUALLY seeking truth you'd look at evidence, not just gainsay any official line.

But of course you're not ACTUALLY after truth, are you? You're simply hiding behind that definition of yourself to justify all the lies you spread and believe.

There's not a single bit of legitimate birther evidence. You can't produce any, that's for sure, but that doesn't stop you from lumping yourself in with the birthers... Sorry, "truth seekers".



posted on Apr, 16 2012 @ 09:20 AM
link   
Annals of censorship


The most effective form of censorship is also the quietest. It operates not by actively proscribing speech but by rendering certain topics hors de combat, literally undiscussable. It does this by propagating an atmosphere of revulsion and taboo. Ordinary censorship prohibits the dissemination of particular opinions or bits of information. The more subtle engine of silence I have in mind goes further. It stanches not only the flow of speech but also the flow of thought. Ordinary censorship occupies itself with the results of human curiosity.

What I am talking about attacks human curiosity itself.


Silence of the Lapdogs
www.dianawest.net...


Clearly, something has us all on lockdown. That’s much, much scarier than even the amazing possibility that some con artist might be pulling off the biggest scam in history.



posted on Apr, 16 2012 @ 09:29 AM
link   
reply to post by Stormdancer777
 


So you ARE paranoid then?

Hundreds of people in state local and feederal government and the media, and civilians, and dozens of court cases all all wrong/conspiring against you. Yep, that's it. You figured it out.

And all those times, like this thread, where birthers have been shown to lie?

Unimportant.

Ahhhhhhhhhhhh... Yeah, youre doing a great job truth seeking.



posted on Apr, 16 2012 @ 09:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by captainnotsoobvious
reply to post by Stormdancer777
 


Paranoid much?

You seem to think that truth has to be the opposite of whatever the accepted mainstream belief is, but of course that's just as close-minded as any "sheeple".

"mainstream belief" is still just a 'belief', not held in a court of law. What one believes is irrelevant, it's what one an prove is relevant. The one with the most evidence wins.



If you were ACTUALLY seeking truth you'd look at evidence, not just gainsay any official line.
So, which is it? Beliefs, or evidence? You seem to be speaking from both sides of your mouth.




But of course you're not ACTUALLY after truth, are you? You're simply hiding behind that definition of yourself to justify all the lies you spread and believe.

There's not a single bit of legitimate birther evidence. You can't produce any, that's for sure, but that doesn't stop you from lumping yourself in with the birthers... Sorry, "truth seekers".



Quite accusatory! Why is it that so many Obama supporters are so hateful? We're not only seeing more and more hate spewed, we're seeing build up to violence. Of course many are paranoid, given all the erratic and spastic behavior coming from the left.

I'm sure it's just a matter of time before we see 'birther' bounties.



posted on Apr, 16 2012 @ 10:14 AM
link   

"This is my last election," Obama told Medvedev.

"After my election I have more flexibility."

"I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir," Medvedev said, referring to incoming President Vladimir Putin.


What year was Obama born?
Height of the Cold War

Kennedy assumes Presidency.
www.maryferrell.org...

His grandparents were Communist his mentor was frank Marshall Davis.

Obama's parents met in 1960 in a Russian class at the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, where his father was a foreign student on scholarship.

"Problems With Our Socialism" that advocates 100% taxation of the rich, communal ownership of land and the forced confiscation of privately controlled land. "
Obama's father.

Alice Palmer, Bill Ayers

Rep. Allen West says many congressional Democrats are Communists,
Congressional Progressive Caucus
Founder,

The Congressional Progressive Caucus was founded in 1991 by Bernie Sanders-the openly socialist then Congressman from Vermont, Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) and the radical Washington DC based "think tank" Institute for Policy Studies

keywiki.org...


'We will bury you,' and I got into trouble with it. Of course we will not bury you with a shovel. Your own working class will bury you,"[5] a reference to the Marxist saying, "The proletariat is the undertaker of capitalism", based on the concluding statement in Chapter 1 of the Communist Manifesto: "What the bourgeoisie therefore produces, above all, are its own grave-diggers. Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable". Khrushchev repeated this Marxist thesis at a meeting with journalists in the U.S. in September 1959

en.wikipedia.org...

American Universities Infected by Foreign Spies Detected by FBI
By Daniel Golden - Apr 8, 2012 4:00 PM CT


‘Academic Solicitation’

While overshadowed by espionage against corporations, efforts by foreign countries to penetrate universities have increased in the past five years, Figliuzzi said. The FBI and academia, which have often been at loggerheads, are working together to combat the threat, he said.

Attempts by countries in East Asia, including China, to obtain classified or proprietary information by “academic solicitation,” such as requests to review academic papers or study with professors, jumped eightfold in 2010 from a year earlier, according to a 2011 U.S. Defense Department report. Such approaches from the Middle East doubled, it said.

“Placing academics at U.S. research institutions under the guise of legitimate research offers access to developing U.S. technologies and cutting-edge research” in such areas as information systems, lasers, aeronautics and underwater robots, the report said.


www.bloomberg.com...

Cold war on Campus

books.google.com... sig=6mCVIvwcl5LGw762WM_EQiLZ8oA&hl=en&sa=X&ei=hzSMT5WSFczqtge5zb3lCQ&ved=0CD4Q6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=American%20universities%20infiltrated%20by%20communis ts%20professors&f=false

What ever he is hiding he is hiding it in plain sight and thumbing his nose at us at the same time.

graphics8.nytimes.com...




Zakaria defends the US from indicators that suggest American decline but warns that internal partisan politics, domestic ideological attack groups, special interest power, and a sensationalistic media are weakening the federal government's ability to adapt to new global realities.



Hmmmm, sounds familiar.
edit on 103030p://bMonday2012 by Stormdancer777 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 16 2012 @ 10:23 AM
link   
reply to post by SourGrapes
 


Show some birther evidence if you have any that's not been repeatedly debunked.

And guess what smarty, I'm not an "Obama supporter" I just don't like people spewing political propaganda.



posted on Apr, 16 2012 @ 10:26 AM
link   
reply to post by Stormdancer777
 


Your posts are getting progressively more and more delusional.

If you read aloud on a streetcorner what you just posted, people would justifiably question your sanity.

You don't ACTUALLY think Allen West thinks Dems are all actual Comminsts do you? You're not that crazy are you?
edit on 16-4-2012 by captainnotsoobvious because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 16 2012 @ 10:31 AM
link   
reply to post by SourGrapes
 





Quite accusatory! Why is it that so many Obama supporters are so hateful?


I think some get paid.

"When shall we three meet again in thunder, lightning, or in rain? When the hurlyburly 's done,
When the battle 's lost and won"

edit on 103030p://bMonday2012 by Stormdancer777 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 16 2012 @ 10:39 AM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



new topics

top topics



 
64
<< 26  27  28    30  31  32 >>

log in

join