It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Obama Lawyer Admits Forgery but disregards “image” as Indication of Obama’s Ineligibility Dama

page: 21
64
<< 18  19  20    22  23  24 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 01:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by spoor

Originally posted by AuranVector
I don't know of any other US President born to a foreign national father who remained a foreign national.


Chester A. Arthur


Fail. William Chester (Arthur Chester's father) did NOT remain a foreign national. He became a US citizen in 1843, 37 years before Chester was considered for VP.

Not a good example for your case that Obama is a “natural born” citizen. In fact, it supports the argument that Obama’s citizenry is questionable.

Chester Alan Arthur (October 5, 1829 – November 18, 1886) was the 21st President of the United States (1881–1885). Becoming President after the assassination of President James A. Garfield….

Chester Arthur was born in Fairfield, Vermont to an American mother and father who had lived in the US for years before Chester’s birth.

Chester Arthur’s father, William Arthur’s wanderings would later form the basis for accusations that Chester Arthur was not a native-born citizen of the United States.

After Chester Arthur was nominated for Vice President in 1880, his political opponents suggested that he might be constitutionally ineligible to hold that office.

A New York attorney, Arthur P. Hinman, apparently hired by his opponents, explored rumors of Chester Arthur's foreign birth.

Hinman initially alleged that Chester Arthur was born in Ireland and did not come to the United States until he was fourteen years old, which would make him ineligible for the Vice Presidency under the United States Constitution's natural-born citizen clause.

When that story did NOT take root, Hinman spread a new rumor that Arthur was born in Canada, but this claim also FAILED to gain CREDENCE.

Chester’s father, William Arthur, emigrated from Northern Ireland (Protestant) to Dunham, Lower Canada (in present-day Quebec) in 1818 or 1819 after graduating from Belfast College. William Arthur moved to the US in in the 1820’s – about 60 years before Chester Arthur would be considered for Vice President.

Chester Arthur’s father, William Chester didn’t become a naturalized citizen of the US until 1843 – 14 years after Chester Arthur was born. This means that Chester Arthur was not a "natural born" citizen since at the time of his birth his father, William Chester was a subject of Great Britain (Canada & Northern Ireland).

This is if you define "natural born" as being born to two American citizens -- which Obama was clearly not.
Furthermore, Obama's father REMAINED a foreign national.

Chester Arthur served in the Union Army with the New York Guard during the Civil War and reached the rank of Brigadier General.

There was no serious question as to Chester Arthur’s birthplace (Fairfield, Vermont) or his loyalty to the US.

Source: various, but mainly Wikipedia


edit on 14-4-2012 by AuranVector because: (no reason given)

edit on 14-4-2012 by AuranVector because: clarity




posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 01:39 PM
link   
Ok, now I am a little lost.

Is this a hoax or not, because its in the hoax bin. It says nothing on the tribune site about being a hoax? And another big story is in the hoax bin, that of disclose tv.

Hmm, something smells a little fishy here and it aint my underwear.



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 02:05 PM
link   
When and why did this thread go HOAX?
I have read the submitted objection to the court and it can be found here.
www.scribd.com...
Is there a court transcript of the proceedings that prove Berry’s attorney did or did not make this statement?
And usually, at least one of the Dos Amigos, has a statement at the beginning of the thread that explains why it has been HOAXED, but there is none.
I went through the 21 pages (quickly, using page down) and did not see a Mod or Super mod stating that this is a HOAX.
So why is this in the HOAX forum?



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 02:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by Bakatono

Originally posted by spoor

Originally posted by AuranVector
I don't know of any other US President born to a foreign national father who remained a foreign national.


Chester A. Arthur


@AuranVector

You see, Spoor likes to make the argument that if someone has done something illegal before it is OK now. I would assume that this is OK as long as it benefits his agenda.

The fact of the matter is it doesn't matter who may have gotten away with it before.

Annnnnndddd, Spoor fails to point out that Arthur wasn't elected. He was VP and became president after the assassination of Garfield. Details Details.

(BTW: He shouldn't have been allowed to be VP either)


I just posted a response to Spoor. Spoor did not understand my post,

"I don't know of any other US President born to a foreign national father who REMAINED a foreign national."

William Arthur (father of Chester Arthur) did NOT remain a foreign national. He became a US citizen in 1843 -- 37 years before Chester was considered for VP.

Actually, the whole Chester Arthur case supports the Birthers.



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 02:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by Violater1
When and why did this thread go HOAX?
I have read the submitted objection to the court and it can be found here.
www.scribd.com...
Is there a court transcript of the proceedings that prove Berry’s attorney did or did not make this statement?
And usually, at least one of the Dos Amigos, has a statement at the beginning of the thread that explains why it has been HOAXED, but there is none.
I went through the 21 pages (quickly, using page down) and did not see a Mod or Super mod stating that this is a HOAX.
So why is this in the HOAX forum?


Because the entire thread is based off the premise that the "Obama Lawyer Admits Forgery"...which is not true....there is no quote of the lawyer saying that.



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 02:14 PM
link   
Maybe we should call those who don't believe the birth certificate as BIRTHERS
Maybe we should call those who believe the birth certificate as FORGERS

Just a thought to keep it straight.



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 02:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by timetothink
reply to post by xuenchen
 


But wouldn't forging the bc be some kind of felony or something? Definitely impeachable I would think.



I am betting it would be. Dont you think since there are no proceedings to impeach that this is just more birther BS ? Anyone with even a tiny bit of brain inside their noggin would see this.



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 02:18 PM
link   
reply to post by Violater1
 


I was wondering the same thing. I just don't want to get dragged into this. I am glad you said it though. I figure not posting and contributing is better than getting banned. I can see this is going the way of the other hoaxed thread about the disc and the dog that although was rightly placed in the hoax bin, was done so without letting the members understand why. not by mods at least. It took good math from a solid member base to do that.

I see human_alien was very active in that thread as well. I am surprised he has kept his cool. I would be banned now if I were him.


I would think it is somehow related. The debate stops on whether Obama's lawyer actually said that, not if it is true or not. He might be good to go but she still might have said that. Sooooo.....


edit on 14-4-2012 by BIHOTZ because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 02:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher

Originally posted by Violater1
When and why did this thread go HOAX?
I have read the submitted objection to the court and it can be found here.
www.scribd.com...
Is there a court transcript of the proceedings that prove Berry’s attorney did or did not make this statement?
And usually, at least one of the Dos Amigos, has a statement at the beginning of the thread that explains why it has been HOAXED, but there is none.
I went through the 21 pages (quickly, using page down) and did not see a Mod or Super mod stating that this is a HOAX.
So why is this in the HOAX forum?


Because the entire thread is based off the premise that the "Obama Lawyer Admits Forgery"...which is not true....there is no quote of the lawyer saying that.


Please provide the court hearing's transcript.
If not, then half of the threads here on ATS would be labeled HOAX.
edit on 14-4-2012 by Violater1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 02:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by vkey08

I'd vote for a robotic Prez I could program to do what the people wanted


seriously, this is just more smoke and mirrors methinks, IF and i stress the IF this was true, every single media outlet would be jumping on it, as would Mitt Romney.. this is an election year and Obama is up for reelection.


You assume the MSM is honest? I lost all respect for the Liberal mainstream media during the 2008 campaign when their bias was blatant for all to see -- except to those in denial.

Which is why I would be very surprised if this is mentioned by the MSM. They are out to protect Obama.



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 02:24 PM
link   
reply to post by The_Phantom
 


Pssst, look at the top of the screen. Up there see ^ this is the hoax folder.
Dont hold your breath for that impeachment.



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 02:26 PM
link   
reply to post by jerryznv
 


Well written, seems legit..... Only a birther could see this as legit. The opening paragraph which assumes a forged birthcertificate tells the story.



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 02:26 PM
link   
The article and the trial are real...the OP was quoting the genuine title of the article....it is not a hoax...

censureship at it's finest.



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 02:27 PM
link   
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


No he's not.
Nothing could.



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 02:33 PM
link   
It's irrelevant, even if by some miracle somebody proved Obama had faulty birth docs it would just mean Joe Biden the puppet from Israel takes over the PR duties for the war machine.

Your problem is you are focused on individual personalities, the clowns who come out and perform for you on media TV.

They are front-men and PR reps for the true power interests. They don't matter. Stop with the partisan crap. Stop with the fixating on one person (Bush, Obama, Romney, etc.). The system will go on no matter what puppet is out front.

That you need to understand, or you will not know anything. Ever.



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 02:37 PM
link   
found a video of it.

they dont say its forged. No, they never say it is a forged BC.



if this was posted before sorry. I am feeling a little slow today. Like everything I do today is like assembling IKEA furniture using instructions written in Aramaic.


edit on 14-4-2012 by BIHOTZ because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 02:37 PM
link   
I just goggled, "Alexandra Hill, admitted that the image of Obama’s birth certificate was a forgery" and attempted to read some of them. However, several of the sites have deleted their story or 404'ed the page.
You can either see this as a cover-up, or, that the story of Berry's attorney calling his Photoshopped birth certificate a known fake , is a hoax.
If it indeed is a hoax, blame it on the source , not Human Alien.
Again, if ATS HOAX'ed every thread that was not verified, substantiated, or was hearsay, half of the threads would not be here.
edit on 14-4-2012 by Violater1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 02:38 PM
link   

Obama Lawyer Admits Forgery but disregards “image” as Indication of Obama’s Ineligibility Damage Control

More articles by Toria » Posted by: Toria Categories: Breaking News, Featured, The President A recent ballot challenge hearing in New Jersey exposes a desperate strategy by Obama to distance himself from his forged certificate and induce the contrived value of his transient political popularity as the only “legitimate qualification” needed to hold the office of the presidency. By Dan Crosby of THE DAILY PEN Editor: Penbrook Johannson Thursday, April 12, 2012


Blame the journalist not the OP.
edit on 14-4-2012 by timetothink because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 02:44 PM
link   
reply to post by timetothink
 


Do you want to have it with me then ? I'll give you the same argument. A persons parents do not have to be US Citizens for a person to be a natural born citizen. My grandfather was born in Italy. My father was born in Brooklyn. My father is a natural born citizen. He was born on US soil. Thats all it takes my friend. Sorry. I hope I wasnt too hard on you.



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 02:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by Stormdancer777
reply to post by xuenchen
 


le sigh , what is it going to take for people to wake up?



We're awake.
It's the birthers who are dreaming.




top topics



 
64
<< 18  19  20    22  23  24 >>

log in

join