It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Obama Lawyer Admits Forgery but disregards “image” as Indication of Obama’s Ineligibility Dama

page: 15
64
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 09:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by ThePublicEnemyNo1

Originally posted by Human_Alien
This is being moved to the HOAX bin?? Are they serious??? What did I miss?


You missed the "FACT" that you posted a thread that's untruthful to say the least. You missed the fact that you reported statements that were Never made in a court of law.

Most of us would consider such actions worthy of a big ole' "HOAX"!


What was never said? The word 'forged'? It was certainly implied.


I honestly don't post political rhetoric that often so I'm really not THAT up on all of this. I know personally I've been suspicious since 2007. As I was towards McCain.

I guess the illegal goings-on my government played on 9-11 made me a tad bit mistrusting and cynical....and this site ain't helping matters either.




posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 09:55 AM
link   
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


It was NOT implied... or said... that's why it's in the Hoax bin. Deal with it.



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 09:56 AM
link   
There is an actual case, the case in and of itself exist, we only need a change of title if Forgery was not claimed by Hill.


The case is not a hoax, the problem is the title.



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 09:56 AM
link   
Any chance we can get [HOAX] tags?!

Just looks more neat.



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 09:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by Human_Alien
What was never said? The word 'forged'? It was certainly implied.


No, it was not implied. Why would it be implied when it is not a forgery?



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 09:57 AM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 09:58 AM
link   
Good work everybody! We have exposed Obama for what he really is. The legal POTUS. Lets all give ourselves a pat on the back for something we have known since day one.

*Pats back*

Be well all and remember "Never trust anything that Human_Alien post".



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 09:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by Stormdancer777
There is an actual case, the case in and of itself exist, we only need a change of title if Forgery was not claimed by Hill.
The case is not a hoax, the problem is the title.


Without that title it would just be

"Another silly Obama birther eligibility claim fails in court"



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 09:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by Stormdancer777
There is an actual case, the case in and of itself exist, we only need a change of title if Forgery was not claimed by Hill.


The case is not a hoax, the problem is the title.


Then create another thread titled "Birther's lose ANOTHER court case".



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 09:59 AM
link   
reply to post by Deetermined
 





In regard to the first issue, it is undisputed that Mr. Obama has not presented the Secretary of State with any form of birth certificate in connection with the nominating petitions, and his counsel in this hearing agreed that she was offering no such document.



As such, while the petitioners were prepared to produce a witness, purportedly an expert, to contend that the long-form certificate, as displayed on the internet, was a forgery, after extensive colloquy, it was determined that that issue is not relevant to the petitioners’ objection herein. It would only be so if the certificate were produced in order to meet a specific requirement of the law, and in that instance, its validity could be challenged. I



What? Is the judge implying that in the state of New Jersey, that when the DNC is the one endorsing a particular person for the Presidency that the person they are endorsing doesn't need to provide qualifications?


That's what I kept saying and everyone kept calling me a liar, how is that fair?



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 09:59 AM
link   
reply to post by ThisToiletEarth
 


How about [BIRTHER] taqs...



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 10:00 AM
link   
reply to post by Stormdancer777
 


That's not why people call you a liar. Which is in fact another lie.



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 10:01 AM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 10:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by captainnotsoobvious
reply to post by Stormdancer777
 


bwahahaha... and you wonder why I called you a liar... hahah

The OP:

Obama's lawyer admitted BC was a forgery.

The Video: the DNC lawyer does not.

You: Thread is grand, title is wrong.

You silly birthers...


Really, the mods allow you to continue to malign my character, when I have posted what was said in the videos, you offer no proof I haven't.



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 10:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by timetothink
What can we do as citizens to do something about this?

Legally, what can we do?

How do we get started?


I am writing my congressman. It is his Constitutional Duty to investigate this and then impeach the president. This is way more than lying to a grand jury or sneaking around in hotels like Clinton and Nixon did. This is huge and it is the DUTY of the congress to rectify this immediately. If they do nothing then you know the USA is no longer in existence. This goes beyond party lines, this is the defining moment that will determine whether there is still a USA or not. BOTH parties should go after this immediately. If they don't then whose to say what usurper will be in the WH next? It could be a republican, or a russian, or a whatever. In order to protect the Republic they need to rectify this ASAP!



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 10:03 AM
link   
Why isnt Human Alien banned? I thought thats what happened to Hoaxsters?



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 10:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by Stormdancer777
That's what I kept saying and everyone kept calling me a liar, how is that fair?


You said, and I quote: "So is this why he only produces internet copies"

That is a lie, he showed a paper copy in 2008.



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 10:05 AM
link   


What's next? A non-human robotic president?


Uh, dude, we have one of those already.



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 10:05 AM
link   
reply to post by Stormdancer777
 


The Mods allow countless birther hoax threads too... I have clearly stated why I called you a liar, and you just ignored it.

You can't say things like ...

Gasp! Obama's lawyers admitted that he didn't produce his original BC!

...and not expect some blow back.

You also can't say that birthers and non-birthers are essentially just having an honest disagreement. We aren't. That's a lie.

Gasp! No Republican candidate President in the history of the US has provided his original BC to the Secretaries of State in all 50 states... gasp!

edit on 14-4-2012 by captainnotsoobvious because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 14 2012 @ 10:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by captainnotsoobvious
reply to post by ThisToiletEarth
 


How about [BIRTHER] taqs...


This



new topics

top topics



 
64
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join