Thrive posted free on YouTube, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 47 times
Topic started on 13-4-2012 @ 08:47 AM by petrus4


Not a bootleg. It's the real deal, on their official channel, at up to 720p resolution.

Hopefully now, some of us can stop claiming that Foster is purely in it for the money/(insert nefarious agenda here). My guess is that, yes, he probably wanted to make a certain amount of money from it, or at least break even, but now that he's perhaps done that, he's gone ahead and put the movie up for the rest of us.

As I've said before, this movie is to the Truth Movement, as World of Warcraft was to MMORPGs. It's the proverbial coming out party. Foster Gamble has helped David Icke become mainstream.

Thrive takes what a lot of us have known for close to the last decade, and puts it in a format and language where normal bluepills can watch it in their living rooms without experiencing seizures in response. This is what you can show Grandma without scarring her for life, unlike Ben Stewart or Alex Jones.
edit on 13-4-2012 by petrus4 because: (no reason given)
edit on 13-4-2012 by petrus4 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 13-4-2012 @ 08:58 AM by jiggerj
reply to post by petrus4

Thanks. No idea what it's about, but I'll watch it because I'm bored. Maybe I'll learn sumthin'.




reply posted on 13-4-2012 @ 09:24 AM by seenavv
I've looked into the suggestion that he is actually part of TPTB and has set to corrupt the truth movement with new age concepts and holes in his overall presentation (such as making people pay for the film, and the fact that he is heir of Proctor & Gamble)

So far, I doubt it...

he sets the record straight IMO and talks about everything from 9/11 to Proctor & Gamble creating the RFID, money system, UFO coverup, all seeing eye, bringing guests like David Icke on the show, and now releasing his movie for free!

also:

What's the meaning behind the Thrive poster? Is it some kind of Illuminati symbolism?

The woman in the poster is removing the blindfold that has been put on her, representing humanity waking up. Though we can see the similarity, there was no intention to represent the all-seeing eye or any other Illuminati symbolism here or anywhere else in the film or website.

www.thrivemovement.com...


How is Foster related to Procter and Gamble?

Foster is the great, great grandson of James Gamble, the founder of Procter & Gamble. He is in no way associated with the running of the multi-national company that exists today. Foster has participated on his own and with various family initiatives to change company policy with regard to issues such as animal testing and pollution. Foster used the time he was afforded by inheriting enough money to research issues that most people don’t have time to pursue. He and Kimberly have invested eight years of uncompensated time and $4.5 million of their own money, (in partnership with individual investors who invested an additional $2.5 million) to make the THRIVE film and website to help empower a self-creating movement that aims to empower a world where all can thrive. Procter & Gamble has not funded THRIVE or any part of it. We welcome people checking the validity of this statement with Procter & Gamble directly.

www.thrivemovement.com...

honestly... I mean my great great grandfather was once actually head of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (now known as BP).... does that mean I'm part of the same line of corrupt behavior/ association that potentially ran through my family? No, its correlation, not causation
edit on 13-4-2012 by seenavv because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 13-4-2012 @ 01:13 PM by DrNotforhire
reply to post by petrus4


thats awesome.. I'm going to check this out when I get home.... you grabbed me with the line about "not like jones"

made me side smile!
edit on 13-4-2012 by DrNotforhire because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 13-4-2012 @ 01:42 PM by petrus4
There is one other thing that this thread has reminded me of, because I'm currently at the point where Thrive is talking about this.

In March of 2011, my grandfather died of a combination of cancer and renal complications, at the age of 94. On the website www.ahealedplanet.net... I had previously read Wade Frazier's account of Gaston Neissens, a French man who had invented a cancer treatment which he called 714X. Although it was expensive, I had been going to pay for a course of this treatment for my grandfather, but I made the mistake of bringing it up with my mother; although I realise now that my grandfather would have been averse to it as well. Unfortunately, he was an adamant materialist, and held a high (and in my opinion, deeply misguided) degree of reverence for conventional medical science.

My mother yelled at me for the suggestion, for reasons I will never understand, adamantly telling me that, "he's had a good run!" My grandfather died less than three days after we had the conversation.

The medicine might not have been able to do anything for him at all, or if it could, might not have been able to help that quickly. I don't know. All I do know is, that I might have had a chance to at least make his final hours more comfortable, if nothing else.

That is part of the way the world currently is, that I want to change.


reply posted on 13-4-2012 @ 04:35 PM by fourthmeal
I watched it (torrents for me, 720p) and while I liked it a lot, I feel that there are some definite problems with misinformation.

If you watch the movie you also need to go to the debunking sites about Thrive, for a full counterpoint. At that point then you'll at least have both sides of it. I dislike the debunking site's attack on things that are presented in the movie as opinion, but I also dislike the opinions that were in the movie stated as FACT. Opinions are opinions, and facts are facts, they should stay that way.

The movie needed to be more carefully fact-checked (for those parts that were presented as fact), and I guess according to the posters in the debunking articles, that didn't happen. Some comments in the debunking site actually claim to be from people that were part of the movie, and that despite their urging for various parts to be re-written for correctness, they were not. I can cite details if needed here, but a quick cursory glance at some of the comments in the debunking site should be enough to find what I'm talking about.

My thing is, for such a ground-breaking movie, the fact-checking mission should have been top priority to nail its credibility down as STRONG, not as it is now, which is debatable. I mean, what can you say when a grouping of the interviewees on the site all banded together and DISASSOCIATED themselves from the movie?? That's not good!

I still loved the message, but I just wish over and over that it was presented after all the facts were checked and re-checked for provable, verifiable evidence. I mean, he even mis-quoted Kissinger, and he mis-directed people about how a certain free energy device works. Unnecessary and it destroys credibility! If you swing for the fences, you better be prepared for the consequences when the ball is missed.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Who Controls Our Children? /The secret War Against America
  Posted 6 days ago with 38 member flags
Let\'s Ban Television!
  Posted 2 days ago with 20 member flags
FOX News Guides Al Qaeda Assassins To Seal Team Member\'s Doorstep
  Posted 18 days ago with 12 member flags
School. My son is Failing some subjects. Should I worry?
  Posted 7 days ago with 7 member flags
Elementary School dumps homework!
  Posted 4 days ago with 7 member flags
My Letter to Michael Gove
  Posted 15 days ago with 3 member flags
When the teacher is out of control.... there is a solution
  Posted 4 days ago with 2 member flags