It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ~Vixen~
Originally posted by BobAthome
reply to post by ~Vixen~
As presidentof the usa for instance u want too take that chance,,
that the American subs are not already there?
and i know their nuclear....right or wrong?
about them being nuclear,, and now invisible too,,
too chinese raidar for instance,,,
ya,,ok,,,
but thats the NukeGame,,,will they???
or will they not??
tick tock
tick tock,,
has the clock moved???
Me
What? This is near the Philippines, thousands of miles away from the US. The US isn't going to risk conflict with the Chinese to defend a Filipino fishing ground. THAT would be insane.
The Filipino fleet wouldn't last 3 minutes once conflict began and missiles started flying. They know that, which is why I said that they will work it out.
Edit to answer question:
The Chinese do have nukes, so yes. The Filipinos don't. The US isn't a party to the dispute, so us having a presence there is irrelevant.edit on 4/13/2012 by ~Vixen~ because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by WinnieDaWho
BRo it is not only a "fishing ground", It is an OILFIELD!!!!
The exact size of the deposits is not yet known, but according to a frequently cited estimate by China’s Geology and Mineral Resources Ministry, the region around the Spratly Islands holds oil and natural gas reserves of approximately 17.7 billion tons. If this figure is correct, the area would form the fourth largest reserve bed in the world.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
I read an article a few weeks ago (I will try and find it) that discussed the Phillipines reconsidering the possibility of allowing a US military presence back on the island to the extent we had the first time around.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
The US is not going to have issues with the Phillipines warming relations back up with the US because of China. In the long term dealing withthe Phillipines is more productive than dealing with China on a conquest binge.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by ~Vixen~
China is on a conquest binge.... for resources. It is only a matter of time before an escalation occurs, like with China and the Philippines, and one side decides not to blink and go for the gold.
Chinese naval vessels confronted Inian naval vessels on a port call to Vietnam. While in international waters Chinese naval vessels challenged the reason for their presence.
On the off chance you are not aware, China lays claim to the entire South China Sea. They are interpreting a UN law called Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). An EEZ is applied to nations who have a board with a large body of water (lake / ocean). That EEZ allows a nation to lay claim to resources within their EEZ. China however apply s the EEZ as territorial instead of resource, challenging foreign naval vessels in what is actually International Waters.
Philippines were in the right on this one, and China is only going to become more aggressive. Also, there are about 6 million other I hate the US threads so feel free to join one of those if you choose. This thread is about Philippines and China.
Originally posted by ~Vixen~
If this incident was intentional, then I *may* agree that this could be construed as an act of conquest, however my interpretation of the circumstances is, respectfully, at odds with yours. I'm not an expert on international law, but absent a conclusive ruling, each party, in my opinion, has a claim to that region, just based on different philosophies.
Originally posted by ~Vixen~
As far as me hating the US you couldn't be more wrong. I've served this country, as have my sons, my husband, father, brothers, cousins and grandfathers. Being an American means standing up for what is right, even if it is at odds with current political policies. Part of being an American is understanding and supporting the concept of freedom of speech, even if you don't agree with what's being said. Being an American doesn't describe one with blind allegiance, but rather one that is willing to voice their opinions in defense of liberty regardless of circumstance. Don't lecture me for derailing the thread, you brought up my "anti American" stance first, I'm simply providing a response and food for thought.
Originally posted by ~Vixen~
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by ~Vixen~
China is on a conquest binge.... for resources. It is only a matter of time before an escalation occurs, like with China and the Philippines, and one side decides not to blink and go for the gold.
Chinese naval vessels confronted Inian naval vessels on a port call to Vietnam. While in international waters Chinese naval vessels challenged the reason for their presence.
On the off chance you are not aware, China lays claim to the entire South China Sea. They are interpreting a UN law called Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). An EEZ is applied to nations who have a board with a large body of water (lake / ocean). That EEZ allows a nation to lay claim to resources within their EEZ. China however apply s the EEZ as territorial instead of resource, challenging foreign naval vessels in what is actually International Waters.
Philippines were in the right on this one, and China is only going to become more aggressive. Also, there are about 6 million other I hate the US threads so feel free to join one of those if you choose. This thread is about Philippines and China.
If this incident was intentional, then I *may* agree that this could be construed as an act of conquest, however my interpretation of the circumstances is, respectfully, at odds with yours. I'm not an expert on international law, but absent a conclusive ruling, each party, in my opinion, has a claim to that region, just based on different philosophies.
As far as me hating the US you couldn't be more wrong. I've served this country, as have my sons, my husband, father, brothers, cousins and grandfathers. Being an American means standing up for what is right, even if it is at odds with current political policies. Part of being an American is understanding and supporting the concept of freedom of speech, even if you don't agree with what's being said. Being an American doesn't describe one with blind allegiance, but rather one that is willing to voice their opinions in defense of liberty regardless of circumstance. Don't lecture me for derailing the thread, you brought up my "anti American" stance first, I'm simply providing a response and food for thought.
Originally posted by WinnieDaWho
The new story is China rejected AGAIN the offer for peacefull diplomatic solution.
m.yahoo.com...
Originally posted by ~Vixen~
Originally posted by WinnieDaWho
The new story is China rejected AGAIN the offer for peacefull diplomatic solution.
m.yahoo.com...
Sorry, but I really believe that the "spin" employed by that source destroys it's legitimacy as an unbiased news source. The title says "China deploys gunboat to disputed shoal" Another article describes it as a "powerful military vessel..."
What is this awesome military vessel they speak of? It's a fisheries patrol ship with no fixed armaments. This entire case is being unnecessarily hyped, and reeks of media spin.
If this Chinese patrol ship and the Philippine navy start shooting each other up, they'll both probably run out of ammo before anything is sunk.
Originally posted by BobAthome
reply to post by ~Vixen~
As presidentof the usa for instance u want too take that chance,,
that the American subs are not already there?
and i know their nuclear....right or wrong?
about them being nuclear,, and now invisible too,,
too chinese raidar for instance,,,
ya,,ok,,,
but thats the NukeGame,,,will they???
or will they not??
tick tock
tick tock,,
has the clock moved???
Me.edit on 13-4-2012 by BobAthome because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by WinnieDaWho
It is useless talking to someone who don't care about evdence, don't care
about news articles, and never even do some research. Cause all they care about is their own pathetic opinion.
It started like many other minor confrontations over the specks of isles dotting some of the world's busiest shipping lanes. But the risks in the latest flare-up over a South China Sea shoal are much bigger than the territory itself.
HOW IT STARTED:
The Philippine navy says it caught Chinese fishermen poaching, and on April 10 two Chinese vessels moved in to protect them. The fishing boats slipped away, leaving behind a tense standoff with each side hoping the other will pull out first.
HISTORY OF FLASHPOINTS:
The shoal is among 200 islands, coral outcrops and banks spread over the South China Sea, with rich fishing grounds and other resources. The biggest of them are the Spratlys, claimed all or in part by the Philippines, China, Taiwan, Malaysia, Brunei and Vietnam.
There have been sporadic shootouts at sea in the past few decades — China-Vietnam, China-Philippines, Taiwan-Vietnam and Philippines-Vietnam — with navies sinking ships and fortifying disputed islands. A major clash in 1988 between China and Vietnam killed 64 Vietnamese soldiers. China took over the Philippine-occupied Mischief Reef in a surprise mini-invasion in 1995.
Then in 2002, all parties agreed to a status quo.
It largely held. Until now.
Read more: www.foxnews.com...
OVERLAPPING CLAIMS:
Scarborough Shoal lies within Manila's 370-kilometer (230-mile) exclusive economic zone, recognized under the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea. But China says the Philippines is misinterpreting the law. Beijing's position is based on ancient maps, though it's unclear how much weight they carry today.
China's map submitted to the U.N. in 2009 claims virtually the entire South China Sea, but Beijing has failed to clarify the exact extent of its claims. It turned down a Philippine invitation for international arbitration.
Read more: www.foxnews.com...