It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Argentina is likely to reinvade the Falklands once Britain drops its guard

page: 7
4
<< 4  5  6    8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 07:30 AM
link   

Originally posted by Germanicus
If the poms care so much about the people of Falklands they should give control of the island to the people that live there.

The people that live there want to be British or did you miss that little point! The ancestors of every one on the Flaklands are British and always have been. The Falklands was unoccupied until the British, French and Spanish landed military personnel there.


These imperialists dont want to lose their military foothole in that part of the world. They also dont want to lose all that cash they will make from the oil in the region.

I hope Argentina does invade. What right do the British have?

More than Argentina! Open a history book and you will see that at the time over arguments about the ownership of an unoccupied set of islands a few hundred years ago the country of Argentina did not exist !!!!. The area that became Argentina was indian occupied land stolen from them by the invading Spanish!


Imperialists.


They wont have the cash to keep it soon. And soon the BRICS will be running things and they will be for Argentina,not Britain
edit on 12-4-2012 by Germanicus because: (no reason given)

What happens to the non military personnel living on the Islands? Are you saying they must be ethnically cleansed becasue they are not Argentinian. Every one of them




posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 07:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by drakus
We will recover the Malvinas, and it will be by peaceful means, it could take 5, 10 or 50 years, but it will happen.

And FYI, before any english settlement was established THERE ALREADY WAS AN ARGENTINIAN SETTLEMENT which was expelled BY VIOLENT MEANS.

What you the mean military personnel that were there for one month ! at the end of 1832. Jesus H, talk about desperate claims.

If anybody can lay claim over the British it is the French since they occupied the Islands first.

The first NON MILITARY colony was established by the British and has remained British ever since.

By the way Mr Argentinian when are you going to give Argentina back to the indigineous population who were there before the Spansih stole the land from them!!!!! 70 million indians prior to the arrival of the Spanish exterminated to 3.5 million in 150 years. Nice going Mr Argentina.

Number of natives killed on the Falklands ZERO because there was nobody there prior to the French, British and Spanish arguing over them !



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 07:57 AM
link   
reply to post by yorkshirelad
 





Are you saying they must be ethnically cleansed becasue they are not Argentinian. Every one of them


Of course. I clearly want them to be ethnically cleansed. I was crystal on that


Pretty sure we have been over the rest of your post earlier in the thread.
Way to contribute



edit on 13-4-2012 by Germanicus because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 08:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by Germanicus
 


I've seen lots of people come and go over the years here on ATS.

You seem like an ok sort of guy and have come out with some thought provoking and challenging posts - so why are you also deliberately annoying and trying to wind people up?
That's a couple of times now that you have stated that you were trying to intentionally provoke people.

T&C prevent me from saying what I would like to.


He's a dirty bigoted troll. He's proved it wishing death to America and the UK. The more I read his replys the more his hatred began to show.



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 08:14 AM
link   
reply to post by mackey1224uk
 


Not to get totally off topic but i will stick up for Germanicus. He has some strong opinions - well so do most of us (hence our participation on a conspiracy website).

In some things, he is very anti UK. In others, not so much. Personally, i have no problem with him offering these opinions. At least if you ask for clarification on a point he has made, you will receive it. That is more than can be said for many posters on here.

Having said all that, he is totally wrong on this issue!

edit on 13-4-2012 by Flavian because: spelling


ETA:

Apologies if HE is actually a SHE.

edit on 13-4-2012 by Flavian because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 08:25 AM
link   
reply to post by mackey1224uk
 


I don't think it's right to discuss another member too much.

Yes, he can be deliberately provocative which I don't like, but he can also provide interesting and challenging posts which is everything this site is supposed to be about.

He is only a new member and he has potential to develop into a very valued, though controversial, member who has a lot to offer and give.
We need people to question the accepted otherwise we just go around in circles discussing same old same old, deal me out of that.
But it should to be done in a constructive and respectful manner.



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 08:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by mackey1224uk

Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by Germanicus
 


I've seen lots of people come and go over the years here on ATS.

You seem like an ok sort of guy and have come out with some thought provoking and challenging posts - so why are you also deliberately annoying and trying to wind people up?
That's a couple of times now that you have stated that you were trying to intentionally provoke people.

T&C prevent me from saying what I would like to.


He's a dirty bigoted troll. He's proved it wishing death to America and the UK. The more I read his replys the more his hatred began to show.


That personal attack is uncalled for. I have offered opposition to the majority. The thread has only three Flags(two now) yet it has alot of posters. Most of which have flammed me. Most however have had something to do with the topic. Do you not enjoy debate? I think its clear I was a pretty poor villian in this case. There are other posters that argued against Britan;s claim better than I did. Its good to have a villian,it allows you to make your point better if you ask me. I dont think its black and white still but I didnt offer much strong argument at all,and I acknowledged that.Others did better.

Am I not allowed to have an opinion? I do not troll. I am honest in what I say. And yes I hate the West. Is that such a shock? Really? When you are on ATS and the bulk of the threads are complaining about government? See I dont just like to talk a bunch of crap for fun and offer obvious tired opinions. I truly hate the Governments of the West and people like you that cheer them on. And I have a million reasons to feel that way.

You accuse me of being a troll,or "dirty troll' yet you contribute nothing. Purely a personal attack.

And whats with the "hatred began to show" ?? Do you love anything? It shocks me that you dont hate the West. That we all dont.

And I dont appreciate the insults at all.

Edit- Hey thanks guys. I tried really hard with that one.

edit on 13-4-2012 by Germanicus because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 08:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by Germanicus

Originally posted by Viking9019
reply to post by randomname
 


Well maybe because the oil near the island isn't in Argentinian water but is off of the Falklands which is British.

The oil is 100% British.


Why then are they bribing Argentina?





you are clever my friend and i agree with you



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 09:34 AM
link   
reply to post by ollncasino
 


So a General is trying to keep the funds flowing by baseless fear mongering.

Why am I not surprised.



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 10:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by cranspace
Argentina does not have the military capability to invade anything
And if they tried the british army would would kick there arses back to argentina

Cran


I'm guessing as the US and UK have a strong alliance, we would end up sending some of our good old boys to join the party.

Isn't this exactly what the world needs right now? Another war in the interest of securing oil?



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 10:20 AM
link   
reply to post by ollncasino
 


Australia could claim that we own New Zealand with that logic!



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 10:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by Germanicus
If the poms care so much about the people of Falklands they should give control of the island to the people that live there.

These imperialists dont want to lose their military foothole in that part of the world. They also dont want to lose all that cash they will make from the oil in the region.

I hope Argentina does invade. What right do the British have?

Imperialists.


They wont have the cash to keep it soon. And soon the BRICS will be running things and they will be for Argentina,not Britain
edit on 12-4-2012 by Germanicus because: (no reason given)


Maybe the decedents of the “POMS” ie Australians should be kicked out of Australia too



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 10:33 AM
link   
I've been to the Falkland Islands, and I've also been to Argentina, and I can tell you that the culture of the Falkland Islands is 100% British, NOT Argentinian. Argentinians never lived there, the islands were completely uninhabited when they were discovered by Europeans. There is some debate about the early history of the islands as to who discovered it first, but the bottom line is that the only human beings to ever have lived on those islands were of British Ancestry. It should stay British.

I visited the islands while working on a cruise ship after college, fascinating place. The scenery is unlike any other place I've visited in the world - a barren, windswept land, but strangely beautiful. The locals brighten up the grayness of the land and skies there by painting their homes very bright colors, almost feels Caribbean with all the colorful homes...



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 10:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by Germanicus

Originally posted by alldaylong
reply to post by Germanicus
 





PostScript- I hate Australia because its a willing enabler of the Imperial Empire. My family happens to be hear though.

Hail China!


edit on 12-4-2012 by Germanicus because: (no reason given)


Ok so the average aussie probably hates you then



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 10:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by Germanicus

Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by Germanicus
 




Does China use its military to invade lands like the Imperialists? No. They invest in countries like Africa and negotiate fair outcomes.

Look at what the West has done. How can you keep supporting them? America is the great satan. It has not saved the world it has destroyed it.

I have no reason to think China would be any worse than America. I have a hard time believing anything could be as demonic as the Imperialists.


Ever heard of a place called Tibet????



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 10:46 AM
link   
reply to post by Germanicus
 


are you

1) hindu
2) muslim?
3) german
4) irish
5) russian?

I support that british be made to pay tens of trillions of pounds in reparations to the nations they waged genocide on . As for USA it must be made to disappear.

Anyways you are cool man.



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 10:52 AM
link   
reply to post by yorkshirelad
 


What UTTER HYPOCRISY!!! You mass murdered 30-50 million native americans,1.8 billion indians ,tens of millions of chinese and yet you have the balls to lecture others.

images4.wikia.nocookie.net... ine_victims.png/310px-800px-v-m-_doroshevich-east_and_war-british_india-_corpses_of_famine_victims.png

images3.wikia.nocookie.net...

This is how you murderous british starved hindus, or like you called them 'heathen hindoos' .
Temple went one step further and instituted relief camps which were not very different to Nazi concentration camps. People already half dead from starvation had to walk hundreds of miles to reach these relief camps, which were hell holes (see fig 3 above for an illustration of a typical famine sufferers condition). Additionally he instituted a food ration for starving people working in the camps, which was less than that given to the inmates of Nazi concentration camps. The rations given to prisoners by the Nazis at Buchenwald concentration camp in 1944 had a calorific value of 1627 calories, while the “Temple” ration for famine victims was 1500 calories[
Reference:
bharatrakshak.wikia.com/wiki/Famines_in_British_ruled_India:_Their_Causes_and_Consequences

The mass murdering Viceroy, Lord “Butcher” Lytton had given specific orders that the news of the famine should be suppressed. But he went ahead with organising a grand durbar in Calcutta in honour of Queen Victoria .While this sham “durbar” was going on nearly 100,000 Indians died in Madras presidency of starvation.

All this western fear of a population explosion derives from the theories proposed by an academic nutcase by the name of Thomas Robert Malthus in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Malthus taught History and Political Economy at the East India College at Hayleybury in Britian. And it is no surprise that Malthus was member of the Christian clergy (a priest for short) and was inspired by “Christian principles”.

Hayleybury College can be considered to be the gutter where “well mannered” white Christian men laid out plans for the conquest and decimation of India. This college was where the future British murderers in India were trained.Some prominent alumni of Hayleybury include Sir John Lawrence (Viceroy of India from 1864-68),Sir Richard Temple (governot of Bombay presidency from 1877-1880).All the crazy economic and social engineering theories which led to the genocides in India were taught here. We can think of this as similar to a Nazi propaganda centre.


edit on 13-4-2012 by mkgandhas because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 11:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by mkgandhas
reply to post by Germanicus
 


are you

1) hindu
2) muslim?
3) german
4) irish
5) russian?

I support that british be made to pay tens of trillions of pounds in reparations to the nations they waged genocide on . As for USA it must be made to disappear.

Anyways you are cool man.



I am Australian.

My Great Grandfather English,Great Grandmother Irish
Other side Spanish.


Im a mess
edit-not my looks (: Im a bitzer.

But to me if you are Australian you are Australian.

As a National Socialist I do care about the country.. I feel it would be better off if it breaks ties with America. Our Government makes us a target of China in the pacific due to its pandering to the Imperialists Americans. If our Goverment takes us to war and invites attack from China i will be cheering China. I will not fight for America or support them in any way.

And thanks.
You are nice.
And you seem cool yourself.

edit on 13-4-2012 by Germanicus because: (no reason given)

edit on 13-4-2012 by Germanicus because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 11:26 AM
link   
reply to post by Germanicus
 


irish spaniard.Your grievance against mass murdering british empire is justified because the british murdered millions in ireland via famines(i think it was potato famine) . British mass murdered 1.8 billion hindus,muslims,buddhists and sikhs.But they never succeeded in wiping the irish and indians out.



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 11:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by shadowland8
reply to post by ollncasino
 


Australia could claim that we own New Zealand with that logic!


Well technically the first people to inhabit New Zealand were white people who lived there before the maori, the maori elders know this too!



new topics

top topics



 
4
<< 4  5  6    8  9 >>

log in

join