It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

[HOAX]saw flying metallic disk in nashville... WITH PICS... and now my dog is sick[HOAX]

page: 10
74
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 12 2012 @ 02:57 AM
link   
I'd still like to see this recreated using an iPhone app. I don't necassarily believe this alien craft but i do believe this is an object of some kind. I will be back later with other considerations later as I am at work now. I'd also like to see someone throw or have thrown too a pan and then it snap shotted just for comparison, to get a feel for the difficulty and other things involved. I would do this myself but I'm at work at the moment. Also mufon sightings page may be a place too look for other sightings??




posted on Apr, 12 2012 @ 03:01 AM
link   
reply to post by RickyVelveeta
 
strange you didn't try to capture a video when you've an iphone…

the first photo looked kind of concave to me; the preceeding photographs would've been fine on their own...all together its like an upturned garbage can lid tied to that antenna tower to the right while someone below was moving it around by yanking the line.

well, at least that's how it looks TO ME

edit on 12-4-2012 by reject because:




posted on Apr, 12 2012 @ 03:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by RickyVelveeta
oh and i named the images 'object1, 2 and 3' because after i emailed them to myself and downloaded, the default download name was just the 'get-attatchment' thing that older macs do. i labelled them so i could find them in my downloads folder for the photobucket upload.


I'm impressed that you seem to be using a real name, with photos from your real home, with a vet-visit for your dog. IDK if you're up for more details but maybe one of those UFO book wrighters should interview you and include your story.

Oh and it sounds like they abducted your dog - who knows maybe you just got that MIB zappy thing
.



posted on Apr, 12 2012 @ 03:04 AM
link   
If it's an app then it is very easy to disprove. Someone else will have that app and will be able to reproduce the same object at the same angles.

If it's a thrown object that's harder to disprove but no one has yet shown any evidence that it is. In fact most of the evidence presented here by skeptics is of the 'it looks like x, therefore it is x' variety which is a fallacy. The rest has just been innuendo.

The fact is there is nothing on this thread which proves anything one way or the other.

I don't know if this is real or not. There, I said it!
edit on 12/4/2012 by MarrsAttax because: spelling



posted on Apr, 12 2012 @ 03:21 AM
link   
In my opinion, ATSers in the UFO are sincerely full of hatred about anything not fitting their logic
I personally DONT believe op, ......but, i still wonder if im not wrong for not believing him.

Really, ATS is the last place where i would post anythings related to UFOS if i get the chance to see somes .

Sincerely, you, pseudo-experts, are simply pathetic.

ATS......deny ignorance ?
what a cruel joke

Keep stroking your egos, you might need it for the next "who is the best debunker" contest.



posted on Apr, 12 2012 @ 03:24 AM
link   
reply to post by MarrsAttax
 


I agree with what you said, I don't think it a trash can lid either as that would glide more like a frisby if thrown like one, I've thrown garbage can lids in my day
not saying it isn't one I too am not sure what I am looking at but I can say one thing for sure we do have the information in front of us to piece something together 3 points of reference!



posted on Apr, 12 2012 @ 03:28 AM
link   
I looks like the dogs bowl.... this is ridiculous



posted on Apr, 12 2012 @ 03:38 AM
link   
Kind of looks like a blimp. Was it moving particularly fast?
2nd



posted on Apr, 12 2012 @ 03:40 AM
link   
reply to post by RickyVelveeta
 


Did you light your smoke using matches? If so then perhaps your pup got hold of them and chewed on them. I sure hope your little dog is alright.
Nice clear pics by the way.



posted on Apr, 12 2012 @ 03:43 AM
link   
Don't listen to people thay say that your photos are fake, the day they see a real ufo they will not accept it.

Your photos have recorded the exact location where you took the photos, because of this for me they are 100% real, I think that if you edit a photo with any app this information is lost.

Anyway don't hear what people say in here about your photos being fake, some day will have to accept that we are not alone in this almost infinite universe.

There will be one time that nobody can hide that ufos are real

Thanks for sharing this photos and I hope and I am sure that your dog will be normal in some days.



posted on Apr, 12 2012 @ 03:56 AM
link   

edit on 12-4-2012 by milkyway12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 12 2012 @ 03:58 AM
link   


When a forensics team comes to the scene of the crime and through careful examination of the evidence finds that the suicide is actually a murder and those microscopic power traces on the spouse's hands are indeed gun residue even though spouse claimed to have been 'away', it's a sure thing the spouse is going to have some really hard uncomfortable questions to answer. In this case, the OP presented evidence. Evidence has so far strongly indicated falsehood. OP's story isn't standing up and holding much if any water. If you're going to perpetuate an outright lie, you better know as much if not more than the forensic analysts that are going to check your story and make sure your facts check out. OP's facts don't check out. OP should be ashamed for trying to perpetuate an outright lie, or have some very solid answers to the 20 second discrepancy in time frames as well as the backwards labeling in time frames and other questions put forward These are valid questions.


Right

I read through this whole thread, and I must admit,the type of responses was exactly what I expected. First couple of posts, scream "hoax", "app", "something thrown in the air". Its so easy to make these type of assumptions, anyone can do it, and it seems lately, anyone and everyone does. No one here has more or less information than all the rest of us get. We all see the "evidence", and we can all jump to conclusions. However, a trend is being set, where any and all ufo pics and videos, gets pseudo analysed, by pseudo experts. Everyone screams, "where is the Exif data!!??", yet how many can actually read it and know what to look for? As a matter of fact, Exif data don't mean all that much anyway.

I member steps up with some pics he took, and his personal account of what happenned.

Other members, who I strongly believe hold a preconceived attitude towards any and all ufo related material step forward to "debunk" the pics.

The above poster seems to think that a forensic analysis can be done on these photos. How absurd. There is not enough here to warrant a "forensic analysis".With the pics being digital, it takes more than some comparisons to apps to confirm its authenticity. After all these pages, I am still not convinced if its fake or not. We must go on the pics provided, and the story of the witness. Except if someone else can come up with "evidence" that proofs otherwise. Layering some pics over each other, and making short gifs, although appreciated, does not confirm or refute the claims made.

I am a sceptic by nature, but when I see members making posts, or jumping straight to conclusions, because their minds is allready made up concerning ufo pics or videos, it just makes me a bit sad. Same goes for the die hard believers.

It seems that sceptics and believers tend to forget their objectivity at the door.

vvv



posted on Apr, 12 2012 @ 03:58 AM
link   
While the EXIF fields indicate original, no compression signatures
in the current database were found matching this make/model

Did you use some kind of Iphone application to take your picture with? You didnt take the picture with your default Iphone camera because you arent matching default Iphone signatures. This means you took the picture with an Iphone but used an Application to either Enhance your picture or take the picture with on your Iphone.

Also , i am looking at the ELA of the photograph and the entire image has been modified.

However , there is strong evidence supporting this has been edited (faked).

Around the Image there is a BLOCK or SQUARE showing that the image has been pasted onto the picture. This is sort of hard to see because the entire Image has been sharpened or enhanced , however , it is still distinct.

------------------------------------------

Look at the image below where the object would be. Notice a distance square or block surrounding the white? It is not natural for the images of the photo to be this bright (white) , the entire photo was edited in some way. The white would be a very calm white blending in with the black. More of a grey. Notice the blue and red pixels indicating editing as well and a bit of a rainbow effect on the entire image.

If you look at the very bottom of the tree you will see a grey white that flows with the black of the background. The entire image should be this color , however , it is not.



edit on 12-4-2012 by milkyway12 because: (no reason given)

edit on 12-4-2012 by milkyway12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 12 2012 @ 04:05 AM
link   
reply to post by greeneyedleo
 
. That is the iPhone app this should be in the hoax bin



posted on Apr, 12 2012 @ 04:06 AM
link   


Around the Image there is a BLOCK or SQUARE showing that the image has been pasted onto the picture. This is sort of hard to see because the entire Image has been sharpened or enhanced.
reply to post by milkyway12
 


Chromatic Aberration causes this.

Chromatic aberration manifests itself as "fringes" of color along boundaries that separate dark and bright parts of the image, because each color in the optical spectrum cannot be focused at a single common point.

There is a very bright background, with a darker object in the foreground. Where the edges meet, this type of thing is rather common.

vvv



posted on Apr, 12 2012 @ 04:08 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Apr, 12 2012 @ 04:09 AM
link   
reply to post by VreemdeVlieendeVoorwep
 


Though im no expert. The evidence is showing this is faked. The block is iffy , but it adds reasonable doubt.[

I am looking at several other images at the moment and havnt seen (of aircraft) that i can find that has contained pixilated event. I got an idea , on second.
edit on 12-4-2012 by milkyway12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 12 2012 @ 04:18 AM
link   
post removed for serious violation of ATS Terms & Conditions



posted on Apr, 12 2012 @ 04:21 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Apr, 12 2012 @ 04:27 AM
link   

edit on 12-4-2012 by milkyway12 because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
74
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join