It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
reply to post by Annee
What does right wing have to do with this?
Really Annee, please stop,
Zimmerman was a democrat,
edit on 073030p://bThursday2012 by Stormdancer777 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by shepseskaf
I agree about comprehensive however its what the prosecutor is stating her entire charge on. Nothing in the affidavit supports a murder 2 charge. A PC is suppose to state the charge and then the essential facts to support the charge.
Im not sure how identifying information which is not a crime -
Following Martin
Confronting Martin (which is in question)
Words with Martin (in question)
Dispatch stating dont follow (not against the law to ignore).
Noting she allowed mom to listen to the tape to ifentify her sons voice....
- supports her argument and position.
Her entire PC statement says I am charging him with murder 2 because Martin was shot and killed and nothing else. I am actually amazed the judge foud the PC valid and supportive of the facts.edit on 12-4-2012 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ButterCookie
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by shepseskaf
I agree about comprehensive however its what the prosecutor is stating her entire charge on. Nothing in the affidavit supports a murder 2 charge. A PC is suppose to state the charge and then the essential facts to support the charge.
Im not sure how identifying information which is not a crime -
Following Martin
Confronting Martin (which is in question)
Words with Martin (in question)
Dispatch stating dont follow (not against the law to ignore).
Noting she allowed mom to listen to the tape to ifentify her sons voice....
- supports her argument and position.
Her entire PC statement says I am charging him with murder 2 because Martin was shot and killed and nothing else. I am actually amazed the judge foud the PC valid and supportive of the facts.edit on 12-4-2012 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)
I am actually arguing this case (on the Zimmerman) with my dad..
I'm trying to explain your very point: that it's NOT ILLEGAL to ignore the dispatcher, whether he did or did not.
Originally posted by digital01anarchy
I would love to see his jury i bet they will all be African Americans lol he will get railroaded we all know this anyone believing that once the president said it could have been his son knew it. I should start selling tee shirts/hoodies that say free the Latino cracker with his picture and make a fortune.edit on 13-4-2012 by digital01anarchy because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by shepseskaf
Originally posted by digital01anarchy
I would love to see his jury i bet they will all be African Americans lol he will get railroaded we all know this anyone believing that once the president said it could have been his son knew it. I should start selling tee shirts/hoodies that say free the Latino cracker with his picture and make a fortune.edit on 13-4-2012 by digital01anarchy because: (no reason given)
Excuse me, but an innocent young man is dead -- for no reason at all, other than the fact that GZ felt compelled to act like a vigilante. I think that people conveniently choose for overlook this fact.
Why should GZ get any sympathy or empathy at all? He didn't display an ounce of either towards Trayvon. It was his actions, and his actions alone, that caused a tragedy that night.
It is my hope that a jury of any composition of races will see this clearly.
This is not a case of being "railroaded". GZ should get exactly what he deserves -- a long stay in prison for murdering an unarmed individual who was on his way back home with some iced tea and Skittles. A person who was not looking for any confrontation at all.
Originally posted by DZAG Wright
No he should have approached Trayvon as a responsible, adult by introducing himself and the entire tragedy could have been avoided. That's what many people are also over looking.
For instance i would have "Hello sir, my name is ________ and I'm the neighborhood watch, how are you this evening?"
Do you not see how that would have defused any possible problems? Yet, everyone wants to lump it on the kid that he should have just instantly bowed to this stranger following him. This alone makes Zimmerman deservant of a prison term.
Originally posted by ButterCookie
I'm trying to explain your very point: that it's NOT ILLEGAL to ignore the dispatcher, whether he did or did not.
Originally posted by Cosmic911
I think the OP is commenting on the politicalization of the shooting. Nothing more. And while we cannot argue how tragic this incident is, it is disturbing to see our politicians trying to capitalize on this shooting during an election year. I think people are conveniently overlooking that fact. I'm confident GZ will get what's coming to him. He'll be held liable both civilly and criminally.
Originally posted by shepseskaf
Originally posted by digital01anarchy
I would love to see his jury i bet they will all be African Americans lol he will get railroaded we all know this anyone believing that once the president said it could have been his son knew it. I should start selling tee shirts/hoodies that say free the Latino cracker with his picture and make a fortune.edit on 13-4-2012 by digital01anarchy because: (no reason given)
Excuse me, but an innocent young man is dead -- for no reason at all, other than the fact that GZ felt compelled to act like a vigilante. I think that people conveniently choose for overlook this fact.
Why should GZ get any sympathy or empathy at all? He didn't display an ounce of either towards Trayvon. It was his actions, and his actions alone, that caused a tragedy that night.
It is my hope that a jury of any composition of races will see this clearly.
This is not a case of being "railroaded". GZ should get exactly what he deserves -- a long stay in prison for murdering an unarmed individual who was on his way back home with some iced tea and Skittles. A person who was not looking for any confrontation at all.
Originally posted by lee anoma
If he really had a broken nose with blood streaming down his shirt as claimed, refused medical attention and ended up looking the same as he did before that injury...Wolverine from the X-Men has nothing on him.
Football emphasizes physical fitness for PROFESSIONAL athletes
We have to jump to conclusions and show bias if we assume Trayvon assaulted Zimmerman however
Don't tell that lie! His girlfriend said Trayvon said he wouldn't run but walk fast.
Originally posted by Cosmic911
reply to post by shepseskaf
I'm not sure if a lot of people know those facts. Probably by now they do, but in the beginning, it just looked like another attempt at a cover up by the local PD. What a mess! Policies & procedures are in place for a reason; see what happens when we circumvent them? That State Attorney is a fool.