It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The new Earthquake Sumantra in 186 day cycle?

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 11 2012 @ 10:15 AM
link   
Did this new Earthquake correlate within that 186 day cycle everyone was talking about a while back? Just curious.




posted on Apr, 11 2012 @ 10:19 AM
link   
No, this Earthquake was too soon.
As far as I know.



posted on Apr, 11 2012 @ 10:19 AM
link   
Nope, it was 188 days to 189 days pushing it depending on time conversion.

The 188 day theory is dead now, and was only limited to 188 days following the 8.8 in Chile until the 7.3 in Fiji imo, unless you want to attribute the quakes that occurred 24-36 hours before March 22nd as being apart of it, but it wouldn't really make sense.

I'd attribute this to general unrest in the area, and possibly a product of the 2004 quake.



posted on Apr, 11 2012 @ 10:19 AM
link   
No. The 186 day cycle came and went some weeks ago. Search through ATS and you'll see.



posted on Apr, 11 2012 @ 10:20 AM
link   
Nope.

The 188 day cycle passed back in late March. Some say the Mexico earthquake filled the gap, but there are other opinions too:
Why the 188 Day Cycle Is FALSE w/Proof

OiO



posted on Apr, 11 2012 @ 11:26 AM
link   



posted on Apr, 11 2012 @ 03:31 PM
link   
nope, the 188 cycle thing is a bust. everyone championed it a month ago when that quake hit in Mexico. so maybe this is the 20something day cycle?



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join