Bank of America Sues Itself..., page


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 30 times
Topic started on 11-4-2012 @ 01:09 AM by Jean Paul Zodeaux
Bank of American Sues Itself In Unusual Foreclosure Case:

Over the past two years, the nation's largest banks and the Obama administration have repeatedly vowed to clean up the foreclosure fraud mess. In February, banks agreed to pay $25 billion and overhaul their foreclosure processes as part of a 50-state investigation into bank wrongdoing, resulting from practices that included robo-signing.

But in Florida's Palm Beach County alone, Bank of America has sued itself for foreclosure 11 times since late March, according to foreclosure fraud activist Lynn Szymoniak, who forwarded one such foreclosure filing, dated March 29, 2012, to The Huffington Post. (A white-collar crime expert, Szymoniak was recently awarded $18 million for her work helping the government recover $95 million as a result of bank foreclosure problems in North Carolina.)


When something doesn't sound right in "law" that usually means it has nothing at all to do with law and is simply just more legality brought forth by a priest class lawyer sect.

"This just strikes me as classic robo foreclosure," Professor Alan White of Valparaiso University Law School told HuffPost. White, a predatory lending expert who tracks and analyzes data on loan modifications and foreclosures, said that lawyers for the bank likely performed an electronic title search to see if any other liens on the property existed and simply wrote down the name of whatever bank came up in the search. Lawyers and paralegals who perform these tasks typically fill out dozens of such forms a day, White told HuffPost.


These are the times in which we live.


reply posted on 11-4-2012 @ 01:28 AM by OmegaLogos
reply to post by Jean Paul Zodeaux



Explanation: S&F!



"It's crazy," housing data analyst Michael Olenick told HuffPost. "They shouldn't be suing themselves."




Personal Disclosure: Repetion for effect ...

But meticulous attorneys would not ordinarily let their clients sue themselves. "It is a little bit mindless on the part of the lawyer," White said. "They don't need to sue themselves."


Uhhhm no its not and yes they do ... that way they get one of their mates to be employed as well!






reply posted on 11-4-2012 @ 01:28 PM by Indigo5
reply to post by Jean Paul Zodeaux



Ahhh...Now it makes sense. A mortgage holder is due money from BOA for a fraudulant foreclosure (robo-signing or something similair) ...but Bank of America might have also issued a home equity loan and thus has a lien on the home. So they file suit against themselves as the lien holder for a fraudulant foreclosure and it is a win-win for BOA. Money from one hand to the other...while the poor smuck who got foreclosed on illegally gets zip. All the while BOA can tell the government and public that they made good on the illegal foreclosure.

edit on 11-4-2012 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 11-4-2012 @ 02:13 PM by Indigo5
Originally posted by tw0330
the interesting thing about this entire story is that companies such as boa have insurance to cover them in cases of lawsuits.


So in otherwords they sue themselves then report it to the insurance company and receive a profit.

How would they get away with this you might ask, well I'm sure there is a partnership with the insurance company where they are scratching each others backs, especially if you have insiders who can make or break a company with the government.


Partnership with the insurance company? How about they own it? WIN-WIN


The Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act (GLB), also known as the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999, ...is an act of the 106th United States Congress (1999–2001).

It repealed part of the Glass–Steagall Act of 1933, removing barriers in the market among banking companies, securities companies and insurance companies that prohibited any one institution from acting as any combination of an investment bank, a commercial bank, and an insurance company


Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase to Be Investigated

The new investigation set forth by the office of Benjamin M. Lawsky, the superintendent of New York State’s Department of Financial Services, will take a look at several large banks, including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup and Wells Faro, to discover whether they have fraudulently steered homeowners into force-placed homeowners insurance policies.

The office has issued 31 subpoenas or other legal notices related to the case in an attempt to discover whether affiliates of banks are receiving kickbacks for agreeing to add this insurance to mortgages—or if there are other conflicts of interest between banks and insurers, such as both functioning under the same parent company.[/ex

www.goinsurancerates.com...]


reply posted on 12-4-2012 @ 03:21 AM by IratePotatoes
reply to post by freetree64



Well you could always sue yourself but then you have to argue with yourself about who will pay.

Pages:     ^^TOP^^



A Really Sad Picture That I Saw Today, Left Me Speechless
  Posted 12 days ago with 148 member flags
Fact Check: First Lady\'s False Fairy Tale of Struggle
  Posted 6 days ago with 81 member flags
Coal miners say they were forced to attend Romney event and donate
  Posted 14 days ago with 71 member flags
Stephen King\'s Message
  Posted 10 days ago with 71 member flags
Paul Ryan Exposes Elite Agenda, "Shut Up" Says Banker
  Posted 10 days ago with 40 member flags