Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s top lawyer disbarred, facing criminal charges

page: 2
9
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join

posted on Apr, 10 2012 @ 05:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by Danbones
so does this mean the FRAUDULENT DOCS the commnder in chief has been foisting on the peeps aren't fraudulaent any more?


No, it means for birthers, reality sucks.




posted on Apr, 10 2012 @ 05:46 PM
link   
drumming up charges that under scrutiny don't hold up ?

this couldn't have ended in a more satisfying way

LOL



posted on Apr, 10 2012 @ 05:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by Indigo5

Originally posted by Danbones
so does this mean the FRAUDULENT DOCS the commnder in chief has been foisting on the peeps aren't fraudulaent any more?


No, it means for birthers, reality sucks.


funny
so you are saying the fraudulent birth docs are still fraudulent



posted on Apr, 10 2012 @ 05:47 PM
link   
No, any document Obama releases will be declared fake by the Birthers. In fact, if he were to release his DNA they'd say the DNA is a fake as well or any results of the test is fake. Of course they'll bring in their experts and try to pass them off as what the rest of America thinks.

Secondly, Arpaio tries to intimidate his political opponents into submission through bogus claims of violations or whatever and people call this bully a hero?

Wow.



posted on Apr, 10 2012 @ 05:48 PM
link   
reply to post by EvilSadamClone
 


obama's docs have not been proved valid
or you would have referenced so
quite the contrary
thus the witch hunt

i suppose you have a problem with rapists and paedos not getting girly mags
what a cruel cruel man
edit on 10-4-2012 by Danbones because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 10 2012 @ 05:57 PM
link   
Birther tactics:

Demand proof, ignore/dismiss proof. Claim there is no proof the BC is valid.

Rinse, repeat, recycle. Argumentum ad infinitum.

And use bad grammar.


Edit: and derail threads that are not about Obama.


edit on 10-4-2012 by EvilSadamClone because: (no reason given)
edit on 10-4-2012 by EvilSadamClone because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 10 2012 @ 06:00 PM
link   
reply to post by Danbones
 


The docs have been repeatedly proven valid. The birther crowd is again saying, "looks at the vast (new) conspiracy". It's ridiculous.



posted on Apr, 10 2012 @ 06:01 PM
link   
ahh... character assaination
now where did you get the idea to do that?
you didn't think that up yourself now did you?

lets see that proof



PS
I write for my intended oddience


since you have nothing to offer in obama's defence to the real detriment of sherriff Joe
have a nice day
edit on 10-4-2012 by Danbones because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 10 2012 @ 06:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by Danbones
reply to post by EvilSadamClone
 


obama's docs have not been proved valid
or you would have referenced so
quite the contrary
thus the witch hunt

i suppose you have a problem with rapists and paedos not getting girly mags
what a cruel cruel man
edit on 10-4-2012 by Danbones because: (no reason given)


you out to look at who really occupies arizonas jails. The majority are there on drug charges. Not rape and pedophilia.

At least TRY when you are going to sensationalize.



posted on Apr, 10 2012 @ 06:10 PM
link   
This is hilarious, Joe is being investigated for removing porn and movies from jail while Obama is readying Guantanamo Bay for American citizens under indefinite detention. I must admit, the elites hypocrisy is second to none.



posted on Apr, 10 2012 @ 06:18 PM
link   

Investigators say that Thomas and Aubuchon knew that the cases they were pursuing were bogus, but pressed ahead anyway, hoping to muddy the waters enough to permanently damage their opponents’ reputations. Investigators have labeled this practice perjury


Kind of like how Obama knows the charges against Joe are bogus, but is pursuing them anyways to damage his reputation. Wow, I must say I am in awe of the irony. Mr. OBAMA, investigators have labeled this practice perjury.



posted on Apr, 10 2012 @ 06:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Lord Jules

Investigators say that Thomas and Aubuchon knew that the cases they were pursuing were bogus, but pressed ahead anyway, hoping to muddy the waters enough to permanently damage their opponents’ reputations. Investigators have labeled this practice perjury


Kind of like how Obama knows the charges against Joe are bogus, but is pursuing them anyways to damage his reputation. Wow, I must say I am in awe of the irony. Mr. OBAMA, investigators have labeled this practice perjury.


Joe has already been ruled unconstitutional. So no, I would say there is a good chance the charges arent bogus.



posted on Apr, 10 2012 @ 06:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Lord Jules
This is hilarious, Joe is being investigated for removing porn and movies from jail while Obama is readying Guantanamo Bay for American citizens under indefinite detention. I must admit, the elites hypocrisy is second to none.


WTF? He is not being investigated for removing porn from jails, he is being investigated for running the Sherrifs office like the Mafia, falsly arresting political opponents, threatening judges who don't support him and illegally searching homes...filming women inmates going to the bathroom etc. (which he got busted for) is the least of his obscene abuses of power.

The guy is the most corrupt sheriff in the country.
edit on 10-4-2012 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 10 2012 @ 06:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by Lord Jules
This is hilarious, Joe is being investigated for removing porn and movies from jail while Obama is readying Guantanamo Bay for American citizens under indefinite detention. I must admit, the elites hypocrisy is second to none.


Ahh yes, the 'ol reductio ad absurdium defense.

You do know it makes you look worse when you make claims like this, right?



posted on Apr, 10 2012 @ 06:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by captaintyinknots

Originally posted by Lord Jules
This is hilarious, Joe is being investigated for removing porn and movies from jail while Obama is readying Guantanamo Bay for American citizens under indefinite detention. I must admit, the elites hypocrisy is second to none.


Ahh yes, the 'ol reductio ad absurdium defense.

You do know it makes you look worse when you make claims like this, right?


I'm sorry I don't respond to ad hominem attacks about how I look when I say things. Talk about the topic, not me, if you can.



posted on Apr, 10 2012 @ 06:31 PM
link   
reply to post by Indigo5
 


Im basing this off your own list which includes banning girlie magaines and salt and ketchup. Real mafia style to me. Lol. If he was so evil dont you think banning ketchup would be so insignificant it would not even register as a footnote? Instead it makes the charges against him look ridiculous, exactly as what they are claiming his lawyer is doing. It is Hypocrisy.



posted on Apr, 10 2012 @ 06:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by captaintyinknots

Originally posted by Lord Jules

Investigators say that Thomas and Aubuchon knew that the cases they were pursuing were bogus, but pressed ahead anyway, hoping to muddy the waters enough to permanently damage their opponents’ reputations. Investigators have labeled this practice perjury


Kind of like how Obama knows the charges against Joe are bogus, but is pursuing them anyways to damage his reputation. Wow, I must say I am in awe of the irony. Mr. OBAMA, investigators have labeled this practice perjury.


Joe has already been ruled unconstitutional. So no, I would say there is a good chance the charges arent bogus.


So why does he still have a job if he was ruled unconstitutional? What does that even mean if he still gets to keep his job?



posted on Apr, 10 2012 @ 06:37 PM
link   
reply to post by captainnotsoobvious
 


I wonder how Sheriff Arpaio will do when he finally goes to prison?



posted on Apr, 10 2012 @ 06:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by LDragonFire
reply to post by captainnotsoobvious
 


I wonder how Sheriff Arpaio will do when he finally goes to prison?


Isn't it interesting how the main theme of this thread is Sheriff Joe is a bad guy because he runs a corrupt jail, then this sentiment is in wonder over how Joe will do in prison, implying that jail will be rough on him, 'stone for a stone, eye for an eye' huh?

Rather than being opposed to jails in general, we want to only hate on one poster child of one prison in one country of the world. AND wishing a hard prison sentence on him, thereby propping up the myth that incarceration is necessary in a 'civilized' society.

So you dont like Joe because he was the head of the DEA? Then oppose the system! You dont like his authoritarian power? Then ban prison overlords! Its that simple. By all means dont play into this circus of an investigation thereby giving more power to the corrupt prison system.



posted on Apr, 10 2012 @ 07:31 PM
link   
reply to post by Lord Jules
 


From what I understand this sheriff is corrupt and his corrupt political machine is crumbling because he was targeting political rivals for arrest and imprisonment??





top topics
 
9
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join