It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NoRegretsEver
Ok so as the question states is it ok to smudge the truth a little to get those that believe nothing is going on in order for them to pay attention. I of course dont mean the attention from everyone but maybe family and some people that you may concerned with.
For example, something so simple as the old saying that if you swallow gum it takes X amount of years to leave your system, how this got famous I dont know but it worked. Lets say you know someone that is hurting themselves with chemicals, or additives, etc,. and you know that in the long run this is going to do harm, so you tell them that this may in fact cause them harm along the way, and they dismiss it.
Do you A, bring it up nonchalantly and say here are the medical implications of the long term damage, here is a video about what it can do, and here is the research, which most likely they will ignore...
Or B, you tell them that this will cause something way more drastic then it will actually do, but may stop them from doing it? And just go right for the scare tactic that people seem to be so fond of, like if you do XYZ, you will glow like a lantern and it will cause Nibiru to seek out those that are glowing and destroy you in a wave of utter destruction!!
Yes of course that was a exaggeration, but you get the picture.
it is incredible how u love to say nothing just to ensure all what is still as it is perfect for u
how can children concept being related to truth smudge ?
by definition a child is a relative one that has nothing to do with absolute facts nor truth
conscious is exclusively about grown up rotten asses, bored to mean nothing after everything they did got to b forced to sit as conscious a bit
Originally posted by galadofwarthethird
That is absolute bullock, you argue then for, and now against. And tomorrow you will argue for and against what you today argued and labeled so absolutely.
bullok urself, i never argued for children, that what prove also how u r nothing but constant lies use
children has nothing to do with truth nor objective facts, it is obvious how u mean to lean on jesus words to justify everything of now for his powers over all
children are simply representant of innocent since they are not relative actors yet, but innocent in reference to relative criminals is not anyone right
ur insistance to b over truth is what certify u being evil ways end
truth is by definition the exclusive existing fact and sense in absolute terms, there cant b a stand out clearly able to speak the truth
while that is confirmed since it would b clear opposition to truth major fact, asserting a stand out of truth existing is clearly shouting for truth destruction then
Originally posted by redoubt
reply to post by NoRegretsEver
Is It Ok To Smudge The Truth A Little In Order To Help Awaken Others?
I recall lying to my children... back when they were still pre-schoolers, telling them that the zucchini squash from the family garden had been grown by chipmunks. They ate it every time we served it! I once told my son... when he was maybe 2nd grade, that a certain food (I forget which) was actually toxic sludge and he cleaned it up.
People all have lines... call them, preferred lines, where you can go and tell them exactly what they want to hear and often get them to do whatever you want. Is this a sin? Yes, undoubtedly... but i think that you will be judged half & half... on action and intent.
Halfway to hell is a lot better than fighting off fire ants in July.