It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
And?
How many wars has religion started again?
How many lives has religion claimed in the name of God?
What does written history have to do with what is contained in the bible? The bible is a compilation of fairy tales, not historical fact.
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
. Even in todays societies, specifically in america and the west we have this thing called "seperation of church and state" and wars still are fought...and over recources not religion but oil.
100 years from now there won't be any religions and wars will still be fought, what will be your excuse then? Oh "wars are fought now because religions that went extinct 100 years ago influenced it". You're just looking for a scapegoat for humanitys' failures.
Originally posted by micmerci
But some crazed bomb wearing maniac says this is in the name of religion and that is accepted as fact? Do you honestly believe that the above is the position of every practicing Muslim? Do you believe that it is the official stance of the religion? Really?
About 700 million information-packed DNA differences exist—including genetic and genomic differences—between humans and chimpanzees.3 Each of these changes would need to become "fixed" into the whole population of primates in order to transform them into humans.
But even if a single human-like mutation fortuitously occurred in both members of a reproducing pair, it would have virtually no chance of spreading to all 10,000 "emerging" humans. Instead, through interbreeding with non-mutants, the mutation would diffuse and disappear after only a few generations.
The only way for that mutation to spread throughout the population is for enough of the non-mutants to die, producing a preponderance of mutants. The problem is that the number of those who would have to be eliminated in order for the mutants to outnumber the non-mutants is more than the population could afford to sacrifice.4 Humans could not possibly have evolved from primates through lucky genetic accidents.
Originally posted by paradox
Originally posted by micmerci
But some crazed bomb wearing maniac says this is in the name of religion and that is accepted as fact? Do you honestly believe that the above is the position of every practicing Muslim? Do you believe that it is the official stance of the religion? Really?
It is. Please look up Jihad and what is permitted in Islamic law, then feel free to come back and discuss.
I can tell you have done no research in this area.
And where did I say it is the position of every Muslim?
Religion has its extremists, but it is done for religion nonetheless!edit on 4-10-12 by paradox because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by micmerci
reply to post by starheart
It was not sarcasm. I try to avoid sarcasm when writing posts in the religious threads because I do not want to be accused of being a condescending, narrow-minded Christian.
I really just try to lay out the terms of the current debate and ask relevant questions. I try to keep it civil and never insulting. I truly enjoy the debate as long as it doesn't descend into a bashing session.
Originally posted by dontreally
I think you have to be semi-retarded to insist that Adam and Eve were historical figures. Of COURSE THEY ARE MYTHS! Undoubtedly. Now, what does the word 'myth' mean to you? If it doesn't connote archetypal-metaphysical reality, then you are just not getting the significance of that biblical narrative.
The prime importance of the story is in it's mythological, or, if you will, metaphysical-ontological meaning. It's speaks about man's spiritual origin, not his material/physical origin.
Can any religious believer in the Bible/Torah really believe, in all intellectual honesty, that a tree of good and evil existed? Does this NOT SOUND LIKE A METAPHOR?edit on 10-4-2012 by dontreally because: (no reason given)
1) And he shewed me a pure river of water of life, clear as crystal, proceeding out of the throne of God and of the Lamb.
2) In the midst of the street of it, and on either side of the river, was there the tree of life, which bare twelve manner of fruits, and yielded her fruit every month: and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations.
Originally posted by starheart
reply to post by micmerci
Right. And even if the science say that Adam and Eve didn't exist, how could they know? They were 6000 years ago, and unless they were momified or in the desert, their bodies are long gone!