It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by wildtimes
...
One of his main points is that every individual has a unique take on life, on their circumstances, and an emotionality that leads them (if at all) to 'religious fervor.' He discusses how some are "converted instantaneously", and others are "incubators" of things they've been exposed to (and subconsciously considering). Others still will never feel the zealous, passionate depth and strength of 'religious revelation' that some experience.
...
But that doesn't mean that a hindu cant claim to have a personal relationship with Krishna.
You were making out that what Jesus was saying at the Last Supper had a corresponding verse in Isaiah which interprets what Jesus said to mean that Jesus' blood somehow causes forgiveness of our sins.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by NOTurTypical
No, it is not that simple, seeing how it never says that in Isaiah, and so then it becomes more complex, involving listening to lessons from your cult leader.
Jesus said to do it to remember Him. Every time I do it I remember what He did for me. His body was broken for my healing and He shed His blood for my sins to be forgiven. (Isaiah 52:7- 53)
Simple as that.
"But he was pierced for our rebellion, crushed for our sins. He was beaten so we could be whole. He was whipped so we could be healed." ~ Isaiah 53:5
edit on 11-4-2012 by NOTurTypical because: (no reason given)
Pagels, Elaine, Revelations: Visions, Prophecy, and Politics in the Book of Revelation
At the beginning of the twentieth century, the psychologist William James recounted many accounts of spiritual breakthrough, including his own recovery from depression, in his book The Varieties of Religious Experience. James relates some experiences that are strikingly similar to those found in other ancient “books of revelation” not included in the New Testament.
I think it's sad that some Christians apparently find it necessary to protect everybody from discussing some 100 year old lectures about religion and psychology. Anything that doesn't fit their framework must be immediately attacked as heresy. It's ridiculous because it sounds like they've made up their own interpretation of Christianity which would probably be rejected by most denominations. Yet they feel 100% certain that everyone else is wrong except for them.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
You were making out that what Jesus was saying at the Last Supper had a corresponding verse in Isaiah which interprets what Jesus said to mean that Jesus' blood somehow causes forgiveness of our sins.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by NOTurTypical
No, it is not that simple, seeing how it never says that in Isaiah, and so then it becomes more complex, involving listening to lessons from your cult leader.
Jesus said to do it to remember Him. Every time I do it I remember what He did for me. His body was broken for my healing and He shed His blood for my sins to be forgiven. (Isaiah 52:7- 53)
Simple as that.
"But he was pierced for our rebellion, crushed for our sins. He was beaten so we could be whole. He was whipped so we could be healed." ~ Isaiah 53:5
edit on 11-4-2012 by NOTurTypical because: (no reason given)
I don't see that being spelled out, and just the enigmatic story of the anonymous Suffering Servant.
Originally posted by Akragon
reply to post by NOTurTypical
I believe he said how we are forgiven...
his blood was Gods sacrifice... To show us how we are forgiven...
I don't see how you can associate his "death" with forgiveness of sin
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by Akragon
reply to post by NOTurTypical
I believe he said how we are forgiven...
his blood was Gods sacrifice... To show us how we are forgiven...
I don't see how you can associate his "death" with forgiveness of sin
I agree, I don't think you can see how. You refuse to take His word for it, He's the ultimate Truth.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by jmdewey60
You were making out that what Jesus was saying at the Last Supper had a corresponding verse in Isaiah which interprets what Jesus said to mean that Jesus' blood somehow causes forgiveness of our sins.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by NOTurTypical
No, it is not that simple, seeing how it never says that in Isaiah, and so then it becomes more complex, involving listening to lessons from your cult leader.
Jesus said to do it to remember Him. Every time I do it I remember what He did for me. His body was broken for my healing and He shed His blood for my sins to be forgiven. (Isaiah 52:7- 53)
Simple as that.
"But he was pierced for our rebellion, crushed for our sins. He was beaten so we could be whole. He was whipped so we could be healed." ~ Isaiah 53:5
edit on 11-4-2012 by NOTurTypical because: (no reason given)
I don't see that being spelled out, and just the enigmatic story of the anonymous Suffering Servant.
No I didn't. I said "Whenever I do it, I remember..". The "suffering Servant" is Jesus. lol When the Eunich was reading about Jesus he was reading Isaiah 53. And in Matthew Jesus said His blood would be shed "for the forgiveness of sins".
Would that be the same Pagels who is a Gnostic and worked with Dan Brown?
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by NOTurTypical
Would that be the same Pagels who is a Gnostic and worked with Dan Brown?
What if it is?? Is that a problem??
You ought to read the link in the initial post by wildtimes. I'm assuming you didn't read it, because you don't seem to be talking about anything from that link. I'm sure you would find parts of it inspiring and it isn't very long. Just a suggestion.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by NOTurTypical
Would that be the same Pagels who is a Gnostic and worked with Dan Brown?
What if it is?? Is that a problem??
Depends.