Originally posted by DavidWillts
Originally posted by RyanFromCan
reply to post by DavidWillts
Please quote it or admit that you are making things up, do it now.
Originally posted by DavidWillts
reply to post by RyanFromCan
The bible, Leviticus specifically, tells you that children who disobey their parents must be stoned, that women must not go out in public while on their periods, that those who work on the sabbath (does not matter what day you consider it) must be killed, I could go on and on, take it all, or leave it all, stop cherry picking when you are a sinner yourself.
I have to go, I have a toasted bacon cheese and tomato sandwich waiting for me, oh wait, pork, meat with dairy, darn, i am in holy trouble now!
And you will continue to feel clever until you actually read and see that I specifically told everyone that I don't believe in the bible nor do i agree with it.
Originally posted by DavidWillts
reply to post by Starchild23
why you so mad?
Originally posted by DavidWillts
reply to post by Pilot
Please go back and read all my posts on the subject, your post makes it look like you can't read.
Originally posted by Starchild23
Originally posted by DavidWillts
reply to post by Starchild23
why you so mad?
Is this your version of rebuttal?
No wonder you never make any sense. I am beginning to think you're only here to laugh at everyone on the forum...in which case, you're more than welcome to take a hike.
You're saying that survival through reproduction is a more important aspect of life in a world where overpopulation is a legit problem, rather than loving everyone no matter what form it takes?
Originally posted by Starchild23
Originally posted by DavidWillts
reply to post by Starchild23
why you so mad?
Is this your version of rebuttal?
Originally posted by DavidWillts
Originally posted by Starchild23
Originally posted by DavidWillts
reply to post by Starchild23
why you so mad?
Is this your version of rebuttal?
I figured it was a proper response to "Then stop quoting the stupid thing " . Im not sure how in depth you want to get considering I can now see what lengths you and others will go to in order to dodge a question and avoid the topic in the OP. All you got is ad hominem and strawmen, it is like arguing with a retarded child, no point really.edit on 12-4-2012 by DavidWillts because: (no reason given)
The gene that belongs to a women which should have been a mute expression in male but it is not, which would make it a abnormality.
IMO, i would say Homosexuality is an abnormality in the gene expression. It is still natural but it isn't normal because the ratio of it being expressed is really low.
Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to post by luciddream
If one is determined to stigmatize homosexuals (or anyone else) one can always find a reason.
Give... just ONE unselfish reason for bringing another child into this world.
Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to post by DavidWillts
I thought AIDS did that
Really? How?
Originally posted by DavidWillts
Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to post by DavidWillts
I thought AIDS did that
Really? How?
AIDS is more prevalent in homosexuals thus stigmatizing it by placing in the same high risk group as IV drug users and prostitutes.
Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to post by Annee
Give... just ONE unselfish reason for bringing another child into this world.
It might be the person to save it.
In any case, animal reproduction is not a rational business. The need to breed is instinctive.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by DavidWillts
Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to post by DavidWillts
I thought AIDS did that
Really? How?
AIDS is more prevalent in homosexuals thus stigmatizing it by placing in the same high risk group as IV drug users and prostitutes.
Actually that is not true.
Two new books just came out on the history of AIDS. You should read them.
