Originally posted by rebellender
reply to post by frazzle
ok I will be king, I impose I dont have to pay taxes, I impose that anything I do is above all laws I impose that I can take 75% of all wealth of my
district, I impose that I get first dibbs on all virgins of the land. I impose I can war with who I wish to challenge other districts for power, I
impose that I get what I want and hand out what everybody else gets.
I impose the Laws of King Henry the 8th, his son Edward and Bloody Mary.
after all fair is fair right.
Ron Paul equals anarchy he has shown his colors, the world has shown its inability to live peacefully
Have a Nice Day
edit on 9-4-2012 by rebellender because: (no reason given)
You're an idiot.
The Union lived with true freedom all the way up until the civil war. You cannot have anarchy when the law
was created to protect
property and rights. We are so brainwashed none of us would know what to do if we magically stepped back in time to 1844. Back when people held
allodial titles for the land they lived on (which means they held the land in fee simple absolute, which means that no government can tax you for
living on that property, which means that there were no "property taxes").
You're entire attitude reeks of indoctrination. "hurr, if we free we be in a anarchy, i need mah chains."
You are taxed to death.
You own no
property ( a deed isn't an allodial title).
You are ruled by the whims of the majority (our forefathers despised democracy, don't believe me? Read Article 4 Section 4 of the federal constitution
very, very slowly).
Our concept of rights and privileges has been perverted.
You have to have a license to exercise what used to be (and still is really), basic human rights.
If something is a right you do not have to ask for permission to exercise that right. If you have to ask for permission it is not a right, it is a
privilege. A license is the State granting you permission to do some activity.
You do not need a license to protest.
You do not need a license to carry a gun.
You do not need a license to engage in commerce.
You do not need a license to operate your
You do not need a license to be considered married.
Take driving a car for example. If you own the car (you know, its your property) you do not need permission to drive it. But you have a license. Which
negates property rights. Which means you do not own your car, someone else does (the state, sounds like communism), they are just giving you the
permission to use it.
But of course, you will defend your own slavery. Mostly because of fear, people want to feel safe, and they need the government to be responsible for
them and keep them secure.
Which is something else our forefathers hated.
Really, Ron Paul just wants to abolish this de facto system that has taken over, to bring the Union back to its roots in a de jure, republican
(Article 4 Section 4) form of government.
But the majority of us are terrified of the idea of freedom. We need someone to hold our hands. We cannot have personal responsibility, its too much
The anarchy fallacy is really old. Just because you are no longer a slave does not mean we have been hurled into chaos. The Union worked just fine for
years within your "anarchy" fallacy.
edit on 4/10/2012 by dalan. because: (no reason given)