posted on Apr, 9 2012 @ 06:59 AM
As always when people make video's of these "artefacts", there is a claim of irrefutable proof to come along with them. However there is NO
archaeological evidence to go along with these supposed artefacts. The date of finding, the names of the so called archaeologists who were supposed to
have found them, the location of the finds. All the common standard information you would need to date them and assure the integrity of the finds.
In fact all we get is more and more of the same thing and lead to a film being produced for December. Strange that isn't it.
If these are genuine artefacts then why have they not been displayed in real? Why have they not been given out for peer review and why are none of the
details of the find given out?
Sorry but a few photos shown by a guy promoting his movie doesn't work for me, I don't mean the guy who made the Youtube video, but the guy who
actually presented the so called proof photos. Seems to me like someone trying to stir up interest to make money with a movie and that is not
conclusive evidence in any shape or form