It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
26 years ago and only 3 weeks before Chernobyl, a US reactor underwent a Common Mode Failure of the type which devastated the Fukushima-Diiachi reactors. 70 scientists and technologists were jammed into the reactor control room in, what ordinary folks would have considered, a suicide pact. At that point, the Common Mode Failure occured and nature took its course.
In Dr John Sackett's word: ".....the worst accident that could befall a nuclear power system, that worst accident is a complete loss of electric power to everything, back-up as well, and failure of all the safety systems that shut the reactor down...."
Darrell Pfannensteil was issuing instructions to his plant operators as the event occured. He had told colleagues beforehand that he was not scared of this type of accident occuring, so what was his response? In his own words: ".....we got to watch the forces of nature shut the reactor down.....we'd found a reactor that could protect itself....."
After 33 years of dedicated, productive work, the political decision to shut down EBR-II was made and in September 1994, Dr Sackett recollects that: "....when I had to go to the operating crews and tell them we'd got the order to shut EBR-II down.....the reaction amongst all the crews was - doesn't the country realise what they're losing here?....". Near to tears, he goes on to say: ".....I remember directing the shut-down---and the scram---and just silence...."
lftrsuk.blogspot.co.uk...
Originally posted by hoochymama
Even if the technology existed it would probably take us more than our lifetime to get rid of our current stockpile and Russia's. Now, what do you do with the accumulated waste during that "lifetime"??
Originally posted by chr0naut
Originally posted by hoochymama
Even if the technology existed it would probably take us more than our lifetime to get rid of our current stockpile and Russia's. Now, what do you do with the accumulated waste during that "lifetime"??
Feed the breeder.
Originally posted by Silcone Synapse
reply to post by lonegurkha
The reason this didn't become mainstream technology is because you cannot enrich isotopes to weapons grade in the system.
That is why we still have dodgy plutonium reactors all over the globe-It was sold to us as a source of energy so cheap it would not be worth metering,when in reality it was so we could all build weapons of mass death.
Screwed up world..