Why is a software company based in Barcelona Spain (SCYTL) now in charge of counting our votes in N

page: 1
6

log in

join

posted on Apr, 8 2012 @ 02:12 AM
link   
I for one would like to know why? Who authorized this? Why was it authorized? America can't count our own votes? Even the Academy Award votes are counted in America! Please refer to the following and it's scary...but you are the final judge and commenter:

By Senior Chief Geoff Ross USN (Ret.)
Why is a software company based in Barcelona Spain (SCYTL) now in charge of counting our votes in the upcoming General Election on November 6th. Did the Federal Elections Commission approve of this? (FEC) Did the Congress of the United States approve of this?
Was this done by an Executive Order from the White House?
Is this the final step in Obama’s rigging of the 2012 election and the formation of a global government. Why is the AP not covering this? Why is Fox news not covering this? What we now have is a Socialist CEO running the worlds voting and election counts. Talk about a UN / Marxist / Communist dream come true. !

www.scytl.com...

Does this explain why President Obama is so sure of being reelected as he speaks of his reelection as if it were in the present. This includes his conversation with the President of Russia which was recorded on a hot microphone?

www.saveamericafoundation.com... ing-election-by-senior-chief-geoff-ross-usn-ret/




posted on Apr, 8 2012 @ 02:15 AM
link   
Why?

To make every form of control by the general public almost impossible, while stating they will do it to be safer..


Another sample of telling us the reverse..

edit on 8-4-2012 by EartOccupant because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 8 2012 @ 02:21 AM
link   
reply to post by EartOccupant
 


Yes, one of many answers... more Chicago thuggery...



posted on Apr, 8 2012 @ 02:27 AM
link   
Elections should NOT be electronic.

- Paper ballots
- Public counting votes after closing
- Every district/vote bureau's results should be published so the people in the district can see if the published result is the same as the public count.
- The total results should be published in a large (online) document, again so every district can see the result reflects the public count at the voting office.

There is no reason to do it electronic.

Faster? Well, who cares it takes one day, two or three?
Safer? Eleectronics? Whhhooooohahahaha



posted on Apr, 8 2012 @ 02:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by kennvideo
I for one would like to know why? Who authorized this? Why was it authorized? America can't count our own votes? Even the Academy Award votes are counted in America! Please refer to the following and it's scary...but you are the final judge and commenter:

By Senior Chief Geoff Ross USN (Ret.)
Why is a software company based in Barcelona Spain (SCYTL) now in charge of counting our votes in the upcoming General Election on November 6th. Did the Federal Elections Commission approve of this? (FEC) Did the Congress of the United States approve of this?
Was this done by an Executive Order from the White House?
Is this the final step in Obama’s rigging of the 2012 election and the formation of a global government. Why is the AP not covering this? Why is Fox news not covering this? What we now have is a Socialist CEO running the worlds voting and election counts. Talk about a UN / Marxist / Communist dream come true. !

www.scytl.com...

Does this explain why President Obama is so sure of being reelected as he speaks of his reelection as if it were in the present. This includes his conversation with the President of Russia which was recorded on a hot microphone?

www.saveamericafoundation.com... ing-election-by-senior-chief-geoff-ross-usn-ret/


Well Americans want to count everybody`s else votes,why wouldn`t someone else counted American votes?



posted on Apr, 8 2012 @ 03:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by John0Doe

Originally posted by kennvideo


Well Americans want to count everybody`s else votes,why wouldn`t someone else counted American votes?


Prove your statement and do not use Iraq or Afghanistan or ANY other country that has not ASKED us to intervene or monitor OR any country that we have helped to form a Democratic legit government when asked... I am not saying that Iraq or Afghanistan will not take the road that S. Vietnam took and be a total loss. We need to not worry about other countries… right now, just our own.
edit on 8-4-2012 by kennvideo because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 8 2012 @ 03:09 AM
link   
It's not the first or only foreign corporation involved in counting (rigging) elections.

Will Israeli Firm Count The Iowa Vote? (ATS)

From other sources:


As pointed out, Voxeo is HQ'd in Orlando FL, home of the 2000 voting fiasco, where the FL supreme court refused to do a recount in the presidential election, in spite a difference in the voting of only a few hundred votes.

Christopher Bollyn has some eye-opening articles on these ties:
Mitt Romney's Ties to Israeli Military Intelligence
It covers some of the wide-spread voter fraud in the recent primaries as well.

 


Electronic voting vulnerabilities:

Computer programmer admits to rigging vote machines... (VIDEO) (ATS)

Election Hacked, Drunken Robot Elected to School Board - e-voting systems decades away from security (ATS)

 


Let's not forget how electronic voting has been abused in the 2004 election - the Ohio Republican AG allowed electronic votes to be routed to a private server, operated by Mike Connelly (a Republican IT "guru"), before then being routed to the AG office. (Connelly died in a mysterious plane crash just after being subpoenaed to testify over the voter fraud allegations - and after being threatened by Karl Rove with death.)

A recent article goes over that election fraud, and has new evidence of the IT architecture used by Rove/Connelly and the Ohio AG office as to how votes got "detoured" before going to Blackwell's office.

New Evidence of Vote Hacking Emerges In Ohio 2004 General Election Lawsuit



posted on Apr, 8 2012 @ 03:42 AM
link   
reply to post by Blackmarketeer
 


Bush won FL. by 537 votes. Heck, New Mexico was decided by 363 votes that had Bush win that state. Gore's people made the mistake of not asking for ALL the counties to recount and not just those few in the southern part of the state.
NO MATTER WHAT, Bush would have won the Presidency. The SCOTUS just skipped a stepped. If SCOTUS did NOTHING it would have gone to the U.S. House and the House would have made Bush the winner. Why? More Reps in the House at that time than Dems and they would have voted party lines...done and done. The House picked the President from an election three times Jefferson, Hayes, and John Quincy Adams. And of course they chose Ford when Nixon quit.



posted on Apr, 8 2012 @ 04:15 AM
link   
I'm really surprised they didn't outsource this to a Chinese company...



posted on May, 1 2012 @ 05:54 PM
link   
reply to post by kennvideo
 


Come on sunspots, do your stuff and knock out the electronic voting system so that Mr Soros is not the only person who gets a vote in the US elections.

I'm surprised how little fuss is being made about this. Don't the American people realise the implications?



posted on Oct, 19 2012 @ 01:07 PM
link   
I especially love this part:

www.westernjournalism.com...



But although SCYTL’s self-proclaimed reputation for security had won the company the Congressionally approved task of handling internet voting for American citizens and members of the military overseas, upon opening the system for use in the District of Columbia, the University of Michigan fight song “The Victors” was suddenly heard after the casting of each ballot. The system had been hacked by U of M computer teachers and students in response to a challenge by SCYTL that anyone who wished to do so, might try!

......because SCYTL will control the method of voting and—thanks to the purchase of SOE–the method of counting the votes as well, there “…will be no ballots, no physical evidence, no way for the public to authenticate who actually cast the votes…or the count.”

The American advocacy group Project Vote has concluded that SCYTL’s internet voting system is vulnerable to attack from the outside AND the inside, a situation which could result in “…an election that does not accurately reflect the will of the voters…” Talk about having a flair for understatement!

It has also been claimed that SCYTL CEO Pere Valles is a socialist who donated heavily to the 2008 Obama campaign and lived in Chicago during Obama’s time as Illinois State Senator. Unfortunately, given what is known about the character of Barack Obama, such rumors must be taken as serious threats to the integrity of the 2012 vote and the legitimate outcome of the election.



All I can say is WOW......this is SOOOOO WRONG.






top topics



 
6

log in

join