It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I'd even say the Pentagon has cameras in every hallway. There has to be footage from within the building that shows the "plane" passing through each section of the building.
I'm still trying to figure out where I stand with regards to 911.
I do think the majority of the "official story" makes more logical sense than some of the alternative theories I've read here and on other websites.
However, the pentagon baffles me.
If they had more photos, and I don't know that they do, why won't they just release the images?
Logically, I can only think of the following reasons not to release the pentagon photos (if they exist):
* No other photos exist. I don't know how many cameras are positioned around the pentagon and other buildings, but I would personally think they'd have more than one.
* The other cameras do not show the aircraft (or whatever) hit
* The photos show something the pentagon wants to keep secret. this could be anything, not necessarily a missile.
* The photos all show the same blurry image: then why not release more blurry images?
But would it really satisfy anyone?
I bet that even if we had 12 different camera angles showing similar blurry shots, there would be folks who insist it was still fake
Originally posted by Genxbeyond
reply to post by Alfie1
www.youtube.com...
Originally posted by psikeyhackr
Originally posted by Fluffaluffagous
Originally posted by psikeyhackr
The only source is the kinetic energy of the falling 15 stories.
psik
Wrong.
As each subsequent level was destroyed/broken loose from the columns/ etc, it PE would be converted into KE. How much KE would of course depend on how much V it achieved by the next level.
Talk is cheap. Show us the physics.
psik
I did.
I showed you that your claim is incorrect. The upper 15 stories is NOT the only KE available.
Do you agree or not?
Let´s look at the Flight 77 / Pentagon videos:....
Originally posted by Fluffaluffagous
I did.
I showed you that your claim is incorrect. The upper 15 stories is NOT the only KE available.
Do you agree or not?
Originally posted by psikeyhackr
So you think TALKING is Showing and you said nothing about the energy required to break things.
You Brilliance astounds me. I cast a shadow in your presence.
psik
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by YetSharkproof
Let´s look at the Flight 77 / Pentagon videos:....
You realize, of course, that there are actual people who saw the actual plane hit the actual building in real time and in real life, right?
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by homervb
I'd even say the Pentagon has cameras in every hallway. There has to be footage from within the building that shows the "plane" passing through each section of the building.
You can say "it" to your hearts content - doesn't mean its true. Even if there were cameras in some of the hallways it doesn't mean that the quality is any better than the entrance way footage we've all seen. This is generally a notion based on the misconception that just because its the military or the government than they have the best and latest technology all the time. Nothing could be further from the truth.
You realize there's footage that is being withheld that could easily be released to put doubts to rest?
I was watching the documentary called "In Plane Site" and it pointed out how in the Pentagon photos you can see office furniture untouched, books open with pages not burnt, and all kinds of evidence that shows there was no massive fire.
The problem I see with this, is that the planes that hit the WTC apparently carried enough jet fuel to melt the supports of two massive skyscrapers but the plane that hit the Pentagon didn't carry enough fuel to burn furniture that was no less than 10 feet away from the impact. Just throwing it out there. I'm not saying this is conclusive evidence, but it does give me doubt of the O.S.
Originally posted by Fluffaluffagous
Originally posted by psikeyhackr
So you think TALKING is Showing and you said nothing about the energy required to break things.
You Brilliance astounds me. I cast a shadow in your presence.
psik
I am uncomfortable with your idol worship.. Please stop.
I merely pointed out your error. Something that anyone with just a high school physics class under their belt should have known.
Kinda ironic then that you continually whine about how high school physics should be able to solve 9/11. Espexially since it's proven by this gaffe that you have never had a high school physics course, and your claim is proven baseless.
Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to post by homervb
You are forgetting, or don't know, that there was further collapse of the structure some 20 minutes after the impact. That exposed things which had not been exposed to the initial conflagration.
Originally posted by hooper
First, there are no doubts. Second, exactly what footage? Please provide some documentation for this phantom footage - and not your opinion that the footage exists.
Please show proof that a given piece of furniture within 120 inches of the point of impact suffered no burn or damage. Or is this just your opinion based on an exhaustive google image search??? This requires you to prove that a certain piece of furniture was in a precise range of location and suffered NO, NONE, ZERO damage.