It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Alfie1
No, the FBI collecting cctv from nearby premises doesn't send up any "red flares" at all. It is standard investigating procedure at any crime scene and would have been very surprising if they did't.
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by psikeyhackr
And he actually thinks I am going to look through all of that.
Yes, just like the NIST report I know you can't be bothered to actually read anything. But you had plenty of time to build your Jenga model of copy paper loops and washers. And you can't help but post your own video hundreds of time.
Originally posted by SimontheMagus
Originally posted by Alfie1
No, the FBI collecting cctv from nearby premises doesn't send up any "red flares" at all. It is standard investigating procedure at any crime scene and would have been very surprising if they did't.
Aaah, so you're saying the FBI needed a gas station surveillance video from half a mile away to try and figure out what the hell hit one of the most secure buildings in the world? While they can't show us one of their own videos? Do you really think those three ridiculous parking gate frames (that show what can only be described as a missile) is all they have?
I think I'm going to go into the security business and put in a bid for my services to the Pentagon. I can definitely do better than their company with just my cell phone camera......
So why hasn't your READING turned up the total amount of concrete in the towers?
The purpose of SEARCHING is to find the important information while ignoring the JUNK.
Of course if they don't put the important information into the report...
Originally posted by Alfie1
It is your misguided assumption that the FBI were looking for CCTV to show them "what the hell hit" the Pentagon. They knew perfectly well what had hit the Pentagon but they had an obvious interest, as any investigators would, in any evidence that could provide information relating to the scene, potential perps or witnesses, vehicles whatever.
Originally posted by SimontheMagus
Originally posted by Alfie1
It is your misguided assumption that the FBI were looking for CCTV to show them "what the hell hit" the Pentagon. They knew perfectly well what had hit the Pentagon but they had an obvious interest, as any investigators would, in any evidence that could provide information relating to the scene, potential perps or witnesses, vehicles whatever.
LOL!! Or they needed to make sure it didn't clearly show the missile and not a 757.....
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by psikeyhackr
So why hasn't your READING turned up the total amount of concrete in the towers?
It has.
So tell us what it is and where it is in the NCSTAR1 report.
Originally posted by Alfie1
Yes, it obviously makes so much more sense to use a missile on a bright sunny morning with thousands of people within and outside the Pentagon.
Originally posted by SimontheMagus
Originally posted by Alfie1
Yes, it obviously makes so much more sense to use a missile on a bright sunny morning with thousands of people within and outside the Pentagon.
When you need to hit a very small target, in this case a low building where you have to, among other things, destroy evidence of trillions of dollars missing from the DoD's budget, you need a weapon that's going to be deadly accurate. Since no airliner on earth could perform the maneuvers necessary, especially after accidentally taking out a few light poles, or guarantee inflicting the necessary damage to accomplish the cover-up, they had to use more specialized weapons. Psy-ops takes care of the details before, during, and afterwards.
You OS'ers are fascinating proof of the effectiveness of Nazi mind control.edit on 25-4-2012 by SimontheMagus because: (no reason given)edit on 25-4-2012 by SimontheMagus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Alfie1
Your "very small target" is actually the largest office building in the world....... No data was lost because the Army information was anyway included in Agency wide budget statements.
That "largest office building in the world" is only five stories tall. An impossible target for a 757 traveling at 500 mph, even for an ace pilot.
It could not have flown that close to the ground and maintained both its airspeed and height off the ground. Experienced pilots have testified to this.
Let alone that we're talking about an Arab who couldn't fly a Cessna.
So even though we have Rumsfeld admitting to the missing trillions, we still don't know what happened to it, do we?
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by psikeyhackr
So tell us what it is and where it is in the NCSTAR1 report.
Never in a million years. Read the report. And read the transcripts from the Mossaoui Trial. And look at the photos. Read the ASCE report on the Pentagon.
Or
Just keep on complaining.
An impossible target for a 757 traveling at 500 mph, even for an ace pilot. It could not have flown that close to the ground and maintained both its airspeed and height off the ground.
You can't tell us what ain't there you can just lie and imply that it is.
Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by SimontheMagus
An impossible target for a 757 traveling at 500 mph, even for an ace pilot. It could not have flown that close to the ground and maintained both its airspeed and height off the ground.
So I suppose these planes could not fly this close to the ground ........
Cathay Pacific Boeing 777
www.youtube.com...
Boeing 757
www.youtube.com...
Air Canada 767
Looks like that building is only 3-4 stories high
www.youtube.com...
You lose .........
Originally posted by SimontheMagus
I have about 20 hours of flight training so I do know a little about flying. Never heard of ground effect? In none of those videos did those planes duplicate anywhere near the trajectory... and they were traveling nowhere near 500 mph, and they didn't shear off five lightpoles and continue flying. All they did was demonstrate the ability to stabilize near the ground, otherwise no one would ever be able to land.
I lose? Nice try, but you're the loser for believing the Nazis who have enslaved you.
Ground effect (aircraft)
en.wikipedia.org...edit on 25-4-2012 by SimontheMagus because: (no reason given)edit on 25-4-2012 by SimontheMagus because: (no reason given)
Maybe off topic a bit, but this might explain why these threads go on forever and the OS'ers will stoop to just about any level to deny reality..... the Nazi mind controllers understand and manipulate the subconscious mind in order to stay in power, and they've been doing it for thousands of years since ancient Babylon at the very least.
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by SimontheMagus
Maybe off topic a bit, but this might explain why these threads go on forever and the OS'ers will stoop to just about any level to deny reality..... the Nazi mind controllers understand and manipulate the subconscious mind in order to stay in power, and they've been doing it for thousands of years since ancient Babylon at the very least.
So if someone disagrees with you they are a Nazi mind controller? Is this a standard part of the process for the search for truth?