It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by psikeyhackr
Originally posted by Human_Alien
But yeah, amazing ain't it?
The laws of physics seem to vary depending on the event.
Yeah, physicists have to get special degrees for 9/11.
Originally posted by Six Sigma
Why not rename this thread to:
Woman Bakes Delicious Apple Pie. (compare to Orange Juice)
Originally posted by GenRadek
ok for starters:
The F-18 Super Hornet crashed with a minimal fuel load.
The F-18 crashed after flying very low and slow.
The F-18 impacted an apartment building, which is mostly wood and light brickwork.
The plane did not impact at 400+mph.
The plane did not impact a massive limestone wall.
Also, to whomever said that on 9/11 a 747 crashed, please, go back and do some actual research so you do not look ignorant and foolish as most Truthers do.
Originally posted by CynicalWabbit
There's a big difference between a fighter hitting a wood frame building and a commercial airliner hitting a structural steel building the size of the pentagon.
Originally posted by FOXMULDER147
I'm lost - what relevance has this to 9/11 aside from the fact a plane crashed?
Originally posted by Theprimevoyager
Wow. Had to have seriously lost control to crash like that.
Originally posted by Demigodly
reply to post by pshea38
No plane theory? Despite coverage by CNN, NBC, ABC, DEF, all live broadcasting in hi-def technicolor?