It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GrinchNoMore
reply to post by AaronWilson
We do ?? Show us these mirrors,
...oh and please keep explaining to us how we cannot get an even REMOTELY clear picture of the landing sites and all the rest of the supposed junk
Originally posted by fleabit
If nothing else amuses me, it's the amount of effort people put into the utterly ludicrous and hilarious "we didn't visit the moon" theories. So much misguided research and deluded conclusions.
We were on the moon - get over it.
Originally posted by longjohnbritches
Where did you deficate and urinate???
How did you breath??
What kept you warm at -200.
What kept you cool at +200.
I want to know more about your experience but this is enough for now.
Thanks alot ljb
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by longjohnbritches
Are you serious???
I know, this was not directed towards me, but.......SERIOUSLY????
Setting aside the "moon" aspect......
....ARE YOU PREPARED to claim, here and now, that even the Space Shuttles, Skylab, and the ISS are all "FAKED"???
Think long and hard on that, "lgb".....
Originally posted by Illustronic
reply to post by longjohnbritches
I'd wager to guess you've never been to the summit of Mt. Everest, so that doesn't exist either?
but with your logic deep sea dives are impossible.
That's all for now.
Originally posted by toocoolnc
NASA insists the space suits the astronauts supposedly wore on the lunar surface were air conditioned. An air conditioner cannot, and will not work without a heat exchanger. A heat exchanger simply takes heat gathered in a medium such as freon from one place and transfers it to another place. This requires a medium of molecules which can absorb and transfer the heat such as an atmosphere or water. An air conditioner will not and cannot work in a vacuum. A space suit surrounded by a vacuum cannot transfer heat from the inside of the suit to any other place. The vacuum, remember, is a perfect insulator. A man would roast in his suit in such a circumstance.
NASA claims the spacesuits were cooled by a water system which was piped around the body, then through a system of coils sheltered from the sun in the backpack. NASA claims that water was sprayed on the coils causing a coating of ice to form. The ice then supposedly absorbed the tremendous heat collected in the water and evaporated into space. There are two problems with this that cannot be explained away. 1) The amount of water needed to be carried by the astronauts in order to make this work for even a very small length of time in the direct 55 degrees over the boiling point of water (210 degrees F at sea level on Earth) heat of the sun could not have possibly been carried by the astronauts. 2) NASA has since claimed that they found ice in moon craters. NASA claims that ice sheltered from the direct rays of the sun will NOT evaporate destroying their own bogus "air conditioning" explanation. - William Cooper
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by Tsurugi
THANK YOU!!!
This post I am replying to sums it up (and, I imagine, many others in the previous pages did as well)....
Skimming this time, due to slow Internet connection, but the OP's premise is flawed, and indicates a primary misunderstanding of the science involved in the PLSS operation.
What the OP's premise appears to show is a comprehension of "air conditioning" in an atmosphere, as here on Earth...your car, your refrigerator, etc....but NOT a full understanding of thermodynamic principles, especially in a vacuum.
This is a most common problem of comprehension, sadly.
Finishing to say, this thread DEVOLVED into a "Moon Hoax" diatribe, which is a shame, since the PLSS principles used in the Apollo/Skylab A7L EVA suit models are not much different from any OTHER EVA suits used since --- for ISS and Space Shuttle missions...(Read about the history of all American EVA suits)..... (even other versions such as, the Soviet-era, now Russian) versions, and to include the Chinese designs....all in the previous link, and further able to be researched online.
The premise of this OP demonstrates a continued bias towards the "dumbing down" of knowledge....
It is called "science"....not "magic"....nor "hoax"..........
"No man has ever ascended higher than 300 miles, if that high, above the Earth's surface. No man has ever orbited, landed on, or walked upon the moon in any publicly known space program. If man has ever truly been to the moon it has been done in secret and with a far different technology."
The first burn of the Agena engine they made was 80 seconds long and put them in a 294 by 763 kilometres orbit. This was the highest a person had ever been (until the next mission when Gemini 11 went to over 1,000 kilometres (620 mi)). This burn was quite a ride for the crew. Because the Gemini and Agena docked nose to nose, the forces experienced were "eyeballs out" as opposed to "eyeballs in" for a launch from Earth. The crew took a couple of pictures when they reached apogee but were more interested in what was going on in the spacecraft — checking the systems and watching the radiation dosage meter.
Gemini 11 used the rocket on its Agena target vehicle to raise its apogee to 850 miles (1,370 km), the highest Earth orbit ever reached by a manned spacecraft. The perigee was 179 miles (288 km), and maximum velocity (at perigee) was 17,967 miles per hour (28,915 km/h).[2] The apogee record stands as of December 2011, even though men have achieved greater distances from Earth by flying to the Moon in the Apollo program. The maximum operational altitude of the Space Shuttle was lower, at 600 miles (970 km).
Originally posted by LucidDreamer85
Originally posted by CynicalWabbit
Here is NASA's explanation of how the PLSS works but it won't matter since your mind is already made up.
www.hq.nasa.gov...
Just seems like there is too many fragile parts in there that if one thing went wrong the astronaut could die.
Unless there is a lot more atmosphere on the Moon than we are told in which case the Suits are not needed and only depressurization and oxygen tank would be needed.
to op
What temp is space then if it's not cold ? Would it be the perfect neutral temp and the only reason we think of space as cold is because of how close our ISS and Astronauts are still to earth.
Originally posted by sirhumperdink
reply to post by longjohnbritches
what are you talking about "how deep"? are you talking about underwater? like with huge amounts of crushing pressure....and you are comparing this to the near void of space?
its hard to understand what youre even trying to get at
i would be far more rude but im fairly certain your drunk so ill be forgiving
and if you agree we can get into space then why not the moon? or do you deny we were able to even get out of the atmosphere in the late 60s?
edit on 6-4-2012 by sirhumperdink because: (no reason given)edit on 6-4-2012 by sirhumperdink because: (no reason given)