It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Moon Landing Hoax - The Space Suit

page: 40
71
<< 37  38  39   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 4 2018 @ 03:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Ove38

So the background in that photo (i.e. the headboard of the bed) is 250,000 miles away is it?

You clearly have no actual photographic knowledge of your own.I think the tag line at the bottom of all my posts just about sums up what's happening here.




posted on Dec, 30 2018 @ 10:42 AM
link   
Anyone care to watch and comment on this about Apollo batteries/broadcasting:




edit on 30-12-2018 by DickDribble because: change

edit on 30-12-2018 by DickDribble because: change

edit on 30-12-2018 by DickDribble because: change



posted on Dec, 31 2018 @ 01:34 AM
link   
a reply to: DickDribble

Apart from wanting to punch the smug so and so in the mouth repeatedly?

He claims it is not possible to broadcast a signal to a rotating Earth even though the people on Earth were pointing a HUGE dish at the moon, he even thinks that an antenna pointing at Earth on the moon would need to rotate for some reason - even though the Earth is pretty much a static object in the lunar sky. Even radio hams can fire a signal at the moon and get a return back. If you can't send a signal to a moving object how does he think mobile phones work in a car? He is another one under the delusion that everything on the moon instantly hits 250 degrees as soon as sunlight hits it, which is just garbage. He claims wire as plastic coated when it was Teflon. The camera and transmitter combined only used around 25 watts (see the comments under the original video, not the one hijacked by those morons at Shill Stompers). He has no idea that the PLSS had a battery (how else would it pump water around?) and that spares were stored in the MESA.

There have been many many probes sent to the moon, all of which have successfully sent large amounts of data back to Earth using very small transmitters, how does he explain that?

All he has is sneering incredulity and a lack of knowledge about how the TV transmissions worked and I wouldn't trust him to wire a plug.

Here are some links for you to explore.



www.amazon.co.uk...

www.hq.nasa.gov...

www.quora.com...

space.stackexchange.com...



posted on Dec, 31 2018 @ 01:35 AM
link   
a reply to: Ove38

and the lens?



posted on Dec, 31 2018 @ 03:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo
a reply to: Ove38

and the lens?

80mm, according to this Pintrest: www.pinterest.co.uk...
I wasn't able to find the original photo, it's probably on Flickr somewhere.



posted on Dec, 31 2018 @ 03:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo

There have been many many probes sent to the moon, all of which have successfully sent large amounts of data back to Earth using very small transmitters, how does he explain that?

All he has is sneering incredulity and a lack of knowledge about how the TV transmissions worked and I wouldn't trust him to wire a plug.



Some of the largest radio telescopes around the planet had a bit to do with all that ( duplex comms and analog TV transmission).



posted on Dec, 31 2018 @ 10:00 AM
link   
a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

My Thoughts exactly . Was trying to figure how to respond to this streaming pile ……



posted on Jan, 1 2019 @ 10:54 AM
link   
a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

Wow, reading the comment section on that original video shows that we as a society are drastically failing in both education and treating mental health disorders.



posted on Jan, 2 2019 @ 02:30 AM
link   
On a tangentially related note, I facebook group I'm in posted a message this morning about the New Horizons probe sending images of Ultima Thule back to Earth. The power it's using? 15W.

What was that about impossible transmissions again?



posted on Jan, 2 2019 @ 01:36 PM
link   
a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

This fact needs to be put into better context.Put that 15 watts into a dipole aerial which is omnidirectional and it'll probably only travel a few miles.It wastes so much of what it can do going in every possible direction it can.
Concentrate that same 15 watts into a tight beam using some sort of array (a dish or Yagi is good for this) and it travels a LOT LOT further because it's not wasting energy going all over the place.If the aerial or array has gain,it increases the ERP (Effective radiated Power) meaning it's capable of doing more work but with less power.If that transmitting aerial has 30db of gain,the ERP is now 15,000 Watts!
The difference is the beam is very tight and needs to be aimed directly at it's target,the dipole just sits there and doesn't need to be moved to get it's signal where it needs to be.




top topics



 
71
<< 37  38  39   >>

log in

join