Moon Landing Hoax - The Space Suit, page 4


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 63 times


reply posted on 6-4-2012 @ 10:47 AM by FraternitasSaturni
Originally posted by toocoolnc
reply to post by FraternitasSaturni


From the information available, I conclude that publicly we have not been to the moon. Although I assume that there have been secret missions to the moon after the hoaxed moon landing. Once they can successfully send man to the moon (In secret) they will apply the technology for future missions and from then forth, the mission will not have to be faked as they would have the technology.


Look I gotta admit that the first one could be faked... after all it was a race with russia in the peak of the cold war, so it could have been a fake operation to make the us look like head and shoulders above russia in front of the whole world... makes sense.

But what about the other ones?

The first one ok... it was a marketing operation, the next ones nah... I believe we went there (apart of course that the ones the people dont know about, which is entirely possible)


reply posted on 6-4-2012 @ 11:02 AM by astroroach
reply to post by toocoolnc


I don't think you've thought this through. Shuttle-era suits use similar cooling technology - if your thesis was correct, then the ISS - which required hundreds of hours of spacewalks to complete - must also be fake. All those pictures from the Hubble Space Telescope must also be fake, right? You are saying not just the Moon landing, but every human spacewalk by the US, Russians and Chinese were faked?

Anyway, your entire premise is wrong:

"The amount of water needed to be carried by the astronauts in order to make this work for even a very small length of time in the direct 55 degrees over the boiling point of water (210 degrees F at sea level on Earth) heat of the sun could not have possibly been carried by the astronauts. "

The space suits were well insulated from the heat of the sun, just as a Thermos bottle keeps the Kool-Aide you've been drinking nice and cool on a hot day. The PLSS only had to reject the heat of the astronauts bodies, not the sun. You cool your body by sweating; water on your skin evaporates, carrying heat with it. The PLSS does much the same thing - sublimating ice carries the astronaut's body heat away. It's basically sweating with an intermediate step. The 1st PLSS models had about 4 liters of feedwater for cooling during a 4 hour EVA. Plenty of "sweat" to cool an astronaut for that time.



reply posted on 6-4-2012 @ 11:03 AM by GrinchNoMore
reply to post by AaronWilson


We do ?? Show us these mirrors, oh and please keep explaining to us how we cannot get an even REMOTELY clear picture of the landing sites and all the rest of the supposed junk ...why the most amazing event done by man is basically ignored entirely by NASA...what happened to the entire event...

Tell us why Nasa TV is all about NOTHING, ALL OF THE TIME.. grade 2 experiments at best.

It is telling as well, when it is more difficult to decipher than the BIBLE what actually went on, and ask yourselves if all the HYPE that OWNED that generation once it was done with has now been cast aside, Forgotten about and you just have no idea why.


reply posted on 6-4-2012 @ 11:49 AM by toocoolnc
reply to post by paradox


Because, At the time of the moon landing in 1969, the astronauts would have had to travell 500 times the distance than we can go. basically, It was the first and last time in history that astronauts claimed to have travelled further then 400 miles into space. and that was over 50 years ago.


reply posted on 6-4-2012 @ 11:54 AM by paradox
Originally posted by toocoolnc
reply to post by paradox


Because, At the time of the moon landing in 1969, the astronauts would have had to travell 500 times the distance than we can go.


Care to prove that's as "far as we can go?"
You're making things up.

It was proven we could go farther than that when we landed on the moon. There has never been any proof the moon landings were a hoax. Every argument is countered with a logical answer which the "moon hoaxers" choose to simply ignore for whatever reason.

basically, It was the first and last time in history that astronauts claimed to have travelled further then 400 miles into space. and that was over 50 years ago.


So? Once again, what is that proving?
What would we be doing floating around in the abyss for no reason? You're aware it takes energy, time, and money, right?


reply posted on 6-4-2012 @ 11:56 AM by toocoolnc
reply to post by paradox


Nasa claim that the mission to the moon in 1969 was due to political aspects regarding a space race. so by that logic your telling me that 50 years ago, people were happy to have the tax money spent on racing into space? but now they wouldnt consider it because its too much of tax payers money.. contradiction?


reply posted on 6-4-2012 @ 11:57 AM by paradox
Originally posted by toocoolnc
reply to post by paradox


Nasa claim that the mission to the moon in 1969 was due to political aspects regarding a space race. so by that logic your telling me that 50 years ago, people were happy to have the tax money spent on racing into space? but now they wouldnt consider it because its too much of tax payers money.. contradiction?


Who said anything about people? (the public)

People do not control where their money goes. This is politics, as the poster above said.
edit on 4-6-12 by paradox because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



Hubble\'s Hidden Treasures - Incredible views of the Universe
  Posted 17 days ago with 40 member flags
Mars curiosity Sol2 Anomalies
  Posted 11 days ago with 22 member flags
Curiosity Just Went Through Mud?
  Posted 0 days ago with 22 member flags
Mars: Fears Curiosity Will Contaminate Planet
  Posted 1 days ago with 21 member flags
Milky Way in detail.
  Posted 14 days ago with 13 member flags
Went to the moon, we never went, was scared off, still going!?
  Posted 15 days ago with 11 member flags