Moon Landing Hoax - The Space Suit

All six Moon landings happened during the Nixon administration. No other national leader has claimed to have landed astronauts on the Moon, despite 40 years of rapid technological development.

Not one thing that appears on the surface of the Moon had to be placed by Man. Be it mirrors to reflect lasers from here on Earth to calculate distances or seismology equipment. All could have been placed there by robotic machines. It wouldn't necessarily need a human to place them there.

(N)ever(A)(S)traight(A)nswer

reply to post by ngchunter


CIA assets are in control of NASA lunar photography. It has been proven.

Originally posted by toocoolnc
All six Moon landings happened during the Nixon administration.

Exactly. That is why we must ask the rhetorical question, CUI BONO?

Cui Bono. Military Industrial Complex are the same that killed JFK.

Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
reply to post by ngchunter

 

CIA assets are in control of NASA lunar photography. It has been proven.

"CIA assets" are in control of NASA shuttle photography. It has been "proven." Therefore whatever conclusions you draw from it for Apollo apply equally to the shuttle.

Originally posted by toocoolnc
All six Moon landings happened during the Nixon administration. No other national leader has claimed to have landed astronauts on the Moon, despite 40 years of rapid technological development.

Not one thing that appears on the surface of the Moon had to be placed by Man. Be it mirrors to reflect lasers from here on Earth to calculate distances or seismology equipment. All could have been placed there by robotic machines. It wouldn't necessarily need a human to place them there.

You forgot that India's space program photographed tracks of Apollo 15's astronauts in September '09.
Japan's lunar orbiter imaged the Apollo 15 and 17 sites in 2008 with a stereoscopic 3D camera, footprints and all.
I suppose next your going to tell us robots made the foot prints.

reply to post by pirhanna

Objects cool via infrared radiation which does not require molecular transfer. A vaccuum is not a perfect insulator, it merely slows down the temperature change.

The molecular transfer speeds up the cooling process. It allows the excess heat inside the suit to be expelled faster.

Sure, it could be done without the water injection system....But, it would require a much (much) larger heat exchanger to be fitted to the suit......not very practical on a suit that is already cumbersome.

Originally posted by ngchunter

Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
reply to post by ngchunter

 

CIA assets are in control of NASA lunar photography. It has been proven.

"CIA assets" are in control of NASA shuttle photography. It has been "proven." Therefore whatever conclusions you draw from it for Apollo apply equally to the shuttle.

And here I thought it might be NRO or NGIA.

I did design a ground imaging server system for the STS, first thing I did after LANL. The Russians were using it at the last on Mir as well, wanted to use it as the main computer system. Not sure how many missions it flew.

Click here for more information.

Click here for more information.

reply to post by toocoolnc


Heat dissipates through the pathways of convection, conduction and/or radiation. A spacesuit's heat-exchanger, in the vacuum of space, would be able to radiate heat eventhough there is no conduction, or convection, due to the vacuum. Air is not a requirement for a heat exchanger to function....think about it. A vacuum limits efficiency by restricting heat dissipation to the radiative pathway...but it still works. Learn about the basic physics of heat to understand these concepts: convection, conduction and radiation. An understanding of those concepts will coincide with the serendipitous realization that OP's arguments are fundamentally flawed because he completely discounts the heat exchanger's ability to radiate heat eventhough it's in a vacuum.

Originally posted by Illustronic
reply to post by longjohnbritches

 

What significance does the 1969 crack imply? Tell us exactly what is so different with space life support and propulsion today from 1969. One can web search answers to the questions you ask. Instead let me offer a little comparison.

First liquid fueled rocket (LFR), March 16, 1926.
First LFR to reach space, June 13, 1944.
First LFR to reach orbit, October 4, 1957.
First spacecraft to reach earth escape velocity, January 2, 1959, (Luna 1), lunar flyby (missed the moon).
First US spacecraft to reach earth escape velocity, March 3, 1959. (Pioneer 4), lunar flyby, missed the moon.
First spacecraft to reach the moon, September 12, 1959, (Luna 2), lunar impact, crashed on the moon.
First successful moon landing, February 3, 1966 using the "hard landing" technique, Luna 9, no photos.
Surveyor 1 (June 1966) was the first American spacecraft to achieve soft landing on the Moon.
After launching on December 21, 1968, Apollo 8 took three days to travel to the Moon, it safely retuned its crew back to earth.
July 20, 1969, at 20:17:39 UTC Apollo 11 safely landed men on the moon.

All seems to be a reasonable progression to me, especially if one considers;
First, special relativity was published in 1905, and the final form of general relativity was published in 1916.
Ernest Rutherford, is widely credited with first "splitting the atom" in 1917 in a nuclear reaction between nitrogen and alpha particles, in which he also discovered (and named) the proton. This led to the first experiment to split the nucleus in a fully controlled manner, performed by two students working under his direction, John Cockcroft and Ernest Walton, in 1932.
Trinity Nuclear Test conducted by the United States Army on July 16, 1945 was the first nuclear bomb detonation.


Apparently figuring out controlled particle physics progressed more rapidly and earlier than rocket science.

So what's so hard to believe?

You know I likes ya
You do try so freakin hard.
But dude half the crap you list was accomplished by a German scientist that the US of A captured and did not release for over 18 years.
It is like he was the first Guantanamo victim.
Every leg and apendage in your litany belongs to this one man.
You want to know about the American space race, eeerrrrr FAILURE.
I got the POOP Ill stick with me or loose orbital control.
ljb

Click here for more information.

The hoax must continue to this day with retouched high resolution images of the Apollo 12 landing site.
These CIA guys have long arms

Originally posted by toocoolnc
All six Moon landings happened during the Nixon administration. No other national leader has claimed to have landed astronauts on the Moon, despite 40 years of rapid technological development.

Not one thing that appears on the surface of the Moon had to be placed by Man. Be it mirrors to reflect lasers from here on Earth to calculate distances or seismology equipment. All could have been placed there by robotic machines. It wouldn't necessarily need a human to place them there.

You have to think of the technology level at the time.Anything done by robotics was unreliable to say the least. Ask the Russians the soviets had the same idea but there Lunokhod turned out to be unreliable and looked like a still from the back woods of Kentucky.

reply to post by toocoolnc


Then why does water turn to ice in space then einstein if it is neither cold or hot?

reply to post by flyingfish


I was just going to post that for our disbelievers. thanks you saved me time awesome to look at it its a time capsule when you think about it. It will all ways look the same even a thousand years from now. Id imagine someday it may become a museum and people will visit just to see the first steps into space. And they'll look and laugh and be amazed we managed to pull it off with such clunky looking stuff.

I do not see what the government would gain from saying they went to the moon if they did not.

reply to post by HonorThySilence


Can you imagine the embarrasment, the humility and defeat of NASA and the USA if they tried to race to space and the mission failed and astronauts died? they had to fake it.. they just could not take the risk without a deep fundemental knowledge of manned space travel..

But obviously everyone seems to think the race was more important than the safety of the astronauts...

Originally posted by toocoolnc
All six Moon landings happened during the Nixon administration. No other national leader has claimed to have landed astronauts on the Moon, despite 40 years of rapid technological development.

Not one thing that appears on the surface of the Moon had to be placed by Man. Be it mirrors to reflect lasers from here on Earth to calculate distances or seismology equipment. All could have been placed there by robotic machines. It wouldn't necessarily need a human to place them there.

Hi too,
Sock it to them.
They are frauds, without remorse.
Killers of so many wonderful American hopefulls. Stupidity took Gus and crew.
Stupidity took the Crew of TWO shuttles.
More truly amazing intelligent enlightened folks have been sent to the WAYSIDE by NASA. With less reason than firemen, American soldiers and law enforcement good folks all. QUE ES ljb