It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kerazeesicko
Idiotic thread started by a childish gun owner. I cannot believe they let people start threads like this...one thread starts out with the same title ..except this has vehicles in it. Basically saying like a child...if you call me a name I will call you a name back.
1. Aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the third degree. (a) A person is guilty of the offense of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the third degree when such person operates a motor vehicle upon a public highway while knowing or having reason to know that such person's license or privilege of operating such motor vehicle in this state or privilege of obtaining a license to operate such motor vehicle issued by the commissioner is suspended, revoked or otherwise withdrawn by the commissioner.
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
reply to post by aching_knuckles
I asked you to prove this through credible legislation, not by pointing to some article somebody has written. Laziness is "pretty easy". Now stop being lazy and go about the business of proving your assertions.
1. Except while operating a motor vehicle during
the course of a road test conducted pursuant to the provisions of this
article, no person shall operate or drive a motor vehicle upon a public
highway of this state or upon any sidewalk or to or from any lot
adjacent to a public garage, supermarket, shopping center or car washing
establishment or to or from or into a public garage or car washing
establishment unless he is duly licensed pursuant to the provisions of
this chapter.
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
Take a careful look at the word "knowing" that I've emphasized. I stated earlier in this thread that people become subject to and liable for certain acts of legislation because of their own signature on a contract. That signature on a contract to obtain a license to drive would offer up prima facie evidence that the signer "knows".
1. Except while operating a motor vehicle during
the course of a road test conducted pursuant to the provisions of this
article, no person shall operate or drive a motor vehicle upon a public
highway of this state or upon any sidewalk or to or from any lot
adjacent to a public garage, supermarket, shopping center or car washing
establishment or to or from or into a public garage or car washing
establishment unless he is duly licensed pursuant to the provisions of
this chapter.
1-a. Whenever a license is required to operate a commercial motor vehicle, no person shall operate a commercial motor vehicle without the proper endorsements for the specific vehicle being operated or for the passengers or type of cargo being transported.
2. Whenever a license is required to operate a motor vehicle, no person shall operate a motor vehicle unless he is the holder of a class of license which is valid for the operation of such vehicle.
12. A violation of subdivision two of this section involving the operation for hire of any vehicle as a taxicab, livery as defined in section one hundred twenty-one-e of this chapter, coach, limousine, van
§ 121-e. Livery. Every motor vehicle, other than a taxicab or a bus, used in the business of transporting passengers for compensation. However, it shall not include vehicles which are rented or leased without a driver.
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
It is quite clear that Section 509 is in regards to operators of motor vehicles "used in the business of transporting passengers for compensation.
It bears repeating; the rules of statutory construction require that each and every word be given significance.
Except while operating a motor vehicle during
the course of a road test conducted pursuant to the provisions of this
article, no person shall operate or drive a motor vehicle upon a public
highway of this state or upon any sidewalk or to or from any lot
adjacent to a public garage, supermarket, shopping center or car washing
establishment or to or from or into a public garage or car washing
establishment
drive a motor vehicle upon a public
highway of this state or upon any sidewalk or to or from any lot
adjacent to a public garage, supermarket, shopping center or car washing
establishment or to or from or into a public garage or car washing
establishment, .
Your interpretation is wrong. But again, dont believe me...try it in court. Will it sink in if it quote it again?
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
reply to post by aching_knuckles
Your interpretation is wrong. But again, dont believe me...try it in court. Will it sink in if it quote it again?
My "interpretation" of a section of the code that I actually took the time to read in its entirety, unlike you who once again used fallacious reasoning and "cherry picked" a very limited and narrow portion of that section in order to convince others of a "requirement" to surrender their rights. If I believed you actually knew what you were talking about I would accuse you of fraud, but it is clear you are just plain ignorant, and willfully so.
I recently read an excellent post made by a moderator explaining that the motto "deny ignorance" is not a call to declare other people ignorant and leave it at that, but rather to instruct them so they do not remain ignorant. I have done my best to do this, but if you insist on remaining ignorant this is...well hell, it's your right to do so.
Whatever...I hope no one follows your ridiculous advice.
Originally posted by aching_knuckles
Have you ever used this defense successfully in a court of law?
Originally posted by aching_knuckles
As the kids say, pics or it didnt happen. Or maybe a court transcript, which is public information.
Originally posted by aching_knuckles
I can control myself just fine. However, alot of the other population cannot. This has been proven time and again. Like I said, one bad apple...the one guy who wants to let his 10 year old drive down the interstate while he takes a nap, and causes a 72 car pileup has just now made it illegal for 10 year olds to drive.
Absolute Freedom is a wonderful ideal. However, it is a pipe dream due to the condition of humanity, namely stupidity. Some idiots need rules, it is unfortunate, but true.
Originally posted by aching_knuckles
So, when you started driving at nine, you never made a mistake, or pulled out in front of someone, or anything?
Good sir, I call you a liar. Anyone who has driven for any amount of time makes those mistakes. And a 10 year old does not have the physical skills to control a 5000 lb car in an emergency. Has the wheel ever turned on you?
Furthermore, drunk drivers endanger people every day....but you think that should be allowed too as well? Suuuuure buddy.