posted on Apr, 4 2012 @ 12:17 AM
Although decently written and having a story-book undertone, in my opinion, I just cannot believe this to be anything more than a pure fabrication. Of
course, I could be wrong, but I am going to trust my instinct and logic on this one. The first, and one of the few, threads I created here was about
disinformation agents, and how logically I could not accept their existence in anything more than an extremely small, and very narrow, scope.
I could regurgitate the points I made from that thread to add some premises to my conclusion, but I don't particularly feel the need to convince
anyone else at this point. So why am I posting at all? Well, here is why...
I want to tell the majority, at least over 50%, who I see alluding to belief on just about any thread by posting congratulatory and nice responses,
that they should almost never simply believe something that is posted anywhere, including this site.
The potential for error is too great, and given the fact that people create threads that are simply untrue or incorrect quite often on ATS I feel that
someone needs to and should promote healthy skepticism. In this case for instance there actually is evidence that could have been posted, despite the
company name conveniently being changed regularly despite the fact that nothing illegal was going on.
Such as former company names if you know them, the address of the building, your username on all of the sites you supposedly worked, etc. There is a
ton more info that could have been given to prove this authentic. And the reason I want this proof, and why I created this post, is not for me, but to
provide the unhealthy believers with a sort of template on healthy skepticism. Hopefully my words are heeded. I am just hoping that this proof wasn't
provided near the end of your thread, because I just had to stop reading after 2 pages or so, lol.
And also please understand that I am not attacking you directly OP. If I KNEW for a fact that you were making this all up I may have attacked you
personally to a degree, while maintaining my position inside the forum rules, but this is not the case. You could very well be telling the truth,
although logically I have shown this phenomenon to be unlikely as a whole, and I still give you the benefit of the doubt...
But, that doesn't and cannot and should not mean I believe you, until proof has been established to a certain degree, and I am hoping this will rub
off on some of the other posters here, especially the newer ones. Thanks for the thread though, as at the very least you have given me an opportunity
to listen to myself talk, lol.