It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Eugenic Laws Against Race Mixing
Paul Lombardo, University of Virginia Laws forbidding marriage between people of different races were common in America from the Colonial period through the middle of the 20th century. By 1915, twenty-eight states made marriages between "Negroes and white persons" invalid; six states included this prohibition in their constitutions.
Influential writers like Madison Grant, a leading eugenicist, warned that racial mixing was "a social and racial crime." He said that acceptance of racial intermarriage would lead America toward "racial suicide" and the eventual disappearance of white civilization.
To prevent further pollution of the country's collective "germ-plasm" and a subsequent contamination of the white race, eugenicists argued for even tighter restrictions against racial mixing. Their efforts focused on new legal definitions of who could qualify to receive a marriage license as a "white" person. www.eugenicsarchive.org...
Originally posted by Dark Ghost
Originally posted by Helmkat
Animals engage in a multitude of behaviors. Compassion, Loyalty, Friendship, Generosity etc. etc. In Nature there is no good or bad behavior, there is only behavior. Human morality though takes behavior A and says "bad" and then says behavior B is "Good". However the truth of morality is that it is as mercurial as nature itself and is always changing.
You are correct.
However, as humans we have the ability to reason, which allows us to interpret behaviour as constructive or destructive to our development. Constructive behaviour usually leads to positive outcomes; destructive behaviour usually leads to negative outcomes. Therefore, it is in our best interest to take part in behaviour that results in positive outcomes and avoid taking part in behaviour that results in negative outcomes.
Many people who oppose homosexuality do so on the grounds that it is a form of destructive behaviour. Consequently, officiating marriage between two people of the same sex (Gay Marriage) is seen as the State's endorsement of destructive behaviour and this is why some people oppose it. People have the right and freedom to take part in destructive behaviour if they choose, but should the State sanction such behaviour?
Mother Nature's Fault Lyrics
the master of deception woke the devil and then set him free she turned from an ocean to an ogre and selected me i can't help but stay away when you're so damn evil i don't care at all assuming that it's mother nature's fault it's funny how a part of me ceases to be i waited all summer just to see her leave www.metrolyrics.com...
Originally posted by Helmkat
Our tiny planet is a spec so small in the "Universe" as to be laughable.
Originally posted by newsoul
In nature there is male (+) and female (-). There are male and female mammals, birds, reptiles and insects. Charged particles work the same way. In magnetism, negative repels negative and positive repels positive. The male (+) prongs on your laptop, fit into a female (-) outlet. Flowers contain both male and female parts in order to reproduce. If you can not see that this universe was built by design, I can't help you.
I have tried very hard to remain civil and courteous to everyone in this thread. And I understand that each of you have your own opinions, and I respect that. But what I am saying isn't rocket science. This universe and all of it's parts were contrieved for balance. And now you will say, "how does granting homosexual marriage disturb the balance?" And I will say, "because it goes against the laws of nature."
Everyone is saying that the government or the state or whoever should not be involved with marriage. This was NOT an issue before homosexuals wanted to marry. It is only an issue now because marriage, is by definition, a union between a male and a female, and the state has thus far upheld that definition.
People think that the government has it's nose in places that it doesn't belong, and maybe it does. But I can guarantee you that if the government simply stepped aside and said "you can now do as you please", this country would crumble faster than a house made of cards. What would happen to all of the welfare recipients, the people on disability, the programs for underpriviledged children? People only seem to have a problem with government when they aren't getting THEIR way.
Originally posted by reitze
Nice try but you started with a falsehood. The "nature" of things in both animals AND particle physics INCLUDES hermaphrodites (both M/F parts, or +/- self-coupled charged), neuters (no parts, neutral charge). Of course they are minorities, just like gays and hermaphrodites are minorities among us --- and "the least among us" socially.
Originally posted by newsoul
reply to post by Helmkat
Do you have proof that life exists on other planets? I didn't think so. Obviously I was speaking about the "known universe".
Is asexual reproduction common? I would venture to say that it is quite rare. And when men and women can reproduce without outside influence I will have this conversation with you. Until then it is a moot point.
edit on 5-4-2012 by newsoul because: (no reason given)
What an idiotic thing to say. I can defend my position-It's the people opposing gay marriage who can't defend their position. Gay Marriage breaks no one's leg nor picks anyone's pocket. Gays pay taxes like everyone else, and what they're doing is legal. Also, don't even bring up children or "family values", because there are married couple out there with no children, as well as some with adopted children. Also, marriage is a legal institution, so religion is irrelevant.
Originally posted by TruckDriver69
reply to post by technical difficulties
In other words you can't defend your position and you need to resort to ridicule and mockery. You gays are so predictable in your effort to spread your religion of hate and intolerance but at the first sign of opposition you resort to primitive, (not childish) but primitive attacks to win what?
Originally posted by BiggerPicture
It's only natural.... BS
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by BiggerPicture
It's only natural.... BS
I know - - - years ago I read this article written by a scientist about the "Stupidity of Mother Nature".
Wish I could find it. It was great.
Originally posted by ImaFungi
reply to post by kaylaluv
I wouldnt joke around about that because the people you are arguing against believes this exists and they call it hell