It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TruckDriver69
reply to post by technical difficulties
In other words you can't defend your position and you need to resort to ridicule and mockery. You gays are so predictable in your effort to spread your religion of hate and intolerance but at the first sign of opposition you resort to primitive, (not childish) but primitive attacks to win what?
Originally posted by BiggerPicture
Originally posted by newsoul
Originally posted by BiggerPicture
So homosexuals are akin to dominatrixes now, too?
You're full of it, plain and simple.
Did I say that homosexuals are akin to dominatrixes??? No I don't believe that I did.
Umm, how did you miss the question mark, and the question?
I am asking up front if you can relate an dominatrix (who provides sexual domination) to what you are accusing the homosexual act as being usually for. It seems that IS what you are insinuating, otherwise mention homosexuality in animals if for dominance. If it is for dominance, then it is NOT "sexuality" (duh) and likewise it would be a leap of (ill) fate to even indirectly (cough) reduce gays to throbbing members craving to dominate another, and.or quivering buttocks yearning to be dominated, sodomized. Is the human homosexual orientation mostly about animalistic sex acts? If that's the case then what purpose would gays be seeking, fighting for, their right to MARRY their loved one?!?
But, I digress - as I do see now you are full of it, semantics and all.
May your progeny grow wiser than you ever did!
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Gay marriage is not a right, and neither is a straight marriage....period!
Originally posted by newsoul
I knew what your answer would be, I have heard it countless times. I am not being intolerant. Everyone in this country has the sames rights to marry. Husband and wife. Male and female. If they choose not to accept that right that is their decision. They want special rights. They want the books wiped clean and to make new laws and enact new ordinances especially for them.
I haven't taken away anyones right to happiness. Homosexuals have as much chance at happiness as anyone else. There are many, many, many straight couples who have found happiness outside of marriage. I wonder how that can be so, apparently the only way for a homosexual couple to be happy is through marriage.
It is natural in the universe for male and female to procreate to further the species. Males alone or females alone can not do that. There are times when a heterosexual couple, for whatever reason can not procreate, but that doesn't go against nature, sometimes things just don't work out for them. Sometimes they choose not to bring children into this world, but could if they wanted too. Homosexuals can not bring children into this world without outside help.
Also, my children are perfectly aware of who I am, what I believe and that I am not a hurtful person. They understand that you can disagree with someone and still love them. I don't appreciate your condescending attitude, you need not worry or pray for my children.
Originally posted by newsoul
reply to post by kaylaluv
Actually, no, I am not opposed to interacial marriage between a man and a woman. You need to stop trying to fit me into that box.
Also, according to your logic, we should all just lay down and die when we get sick. Ridiculous. Why, if we have the means, would we not heal ourselves??
Flying? It's called technology and has nothing to do with the laws of the nature. Nature did not dictate that we would never fly. We do not have wings, but we have knowledge.
Speaking of intolerance. I believe that you are being intolerant to my beliefs. It is a paradox.
Originally posted by newsoul
reply to post by kaylaluv
I don't agree with you and if you want to call me intolerant or racist (which I am not) or sexist, you have every right to do that. It's called free speech, and I support it.
Apparently you do not agree with free speech and think that I should be sensored for sharing my personal opinion.
I have stated that I am not opposed to interacial marriage between a man and a woman, and I do not feel that it goes against the laws of nature.
There are herbal supplements in nature that have extreme healing properties.
Technology is amazing.
I am not prejudice toward any group of people. I do not believe that homosexuals should be allowed to marry. I do not harbor hostility or hatred toward them. I do not believe that any group should be allowed special rights over another group. How is that prejudice??
Originally posted by kaylaluv
Originally posted by newsoul
reply to post by kaylaluv
I don't agree with you and if you want to call me intolerant or racist (which I am not) or sexist, you have every right to do that. It's called free speech, and I support it.
Apparently you do not agree with free speech and think that I should be sensored for sharing my personal opinion.
I have stated that I am not opposed to interacial marriage between a man and a woman, and I do not feel that it goes against the laws of nature.
There are herbal supplements in nature that have extreme healing properties.
Technology is amazing.
I am not prejudice toward any group of people. I do not believe that homosexuals should be allowed to marry. I do not harbor hostility or hatred toward them. I do not believe that any group should be allowed special rights over another group. How is that prejudice??
Have I ever said you should be censored?? This is a debate. Speak all you want. I will have a counter-argument for all your arguments.
Older generations did believe that interracial marriages went against natural laws. Younger generations (such as yourself) don't really believe that anymore. Polls tell us that more and more of today's younger generation are becoming accepting of gays, and are fine with gay marriage. Trust me, future generations will wonder what all the fuss was about regarding gay marriage.
How does allowing gay marriage give them special rights over another group? That statement implies that another group's rights are being taken away in order to allow gay marriage. How is that happening? Merriam-Webster's definition of prejudice is -" the injury or damage resulting from some judgment or action of another in disregards of one's rights." How is your belief against gays' right to marry who they love NOT prejudice?
Originally posted by newsoul
I don't know which part of this you aren't getting. I said in ANIMAL behavior. Animals often eat their young, engage in cannibalism and homosexuality as a means of domination. I also said I "think" we as humans are above these animalistic behaviors. Now it is obvious that you have not read this entire thread or you would know that the reason I brought this up is because another poster was using animal behavior as a means to justify homosexuality. If animals eat their young and engage in cannibalism, are these also things that we have to look forward to in humans?? By their logic, yes.
Originally posted by ezwip
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Gay marriage is not a right, and neither is a straight marriage....period!
Exactly, it's not about marriage it's about if they should get the same govt benefits or not.
Originally posted by Garfee
Originally posted by ezwip
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Gay marriage is not a right, and neither is a straight marriage....period!
Exactly, it's not about marriage it's about if they should get the same govt benefits or not.
You're wrong.
It's about knowing you are bound to your partner and that the partnership has been officiated.
Originally posted by Garfee
reply to post by reitze
The system still exists. It's hardly perfect but it's what we have for now.