It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Freeborn
Of course we still have gun related crime - just not to the levels you do in the USA.
8775 gun related crimes in the USA in one year compared to 43 in the UK gives testament to that.
If guns were more easily available then they would be used more often, pretty simple really.
Originally posted by Freeborn
Don't know about that.
Seems to me that far too many people take any sort of criticism of anything American automatically as a sign that a person is overtly anti-American.
Originally posted by Freeborn
I have repeatedly stated that I firmly believe that The Right To Bear Arms as defined in The Second Amendment is really a matter for Americans and Americans only.
It's just not needed and probably more importantly not wanted in most other countries.
Different countries, different cultures, different requirements.
Originally posted by Freeborn
And to be honest we get a bit sick of American posters butting into at all sorts of threads saying that this or that wouldn't happen if we had The Right To Bear Arms.
Well guess what - it would and it does.
Please let us do things our way whilst you do things your way.
Originally posted by Freeborn
ETA.
What, you think no-one criticises governments here in the UK and continental Europe?
edit on 9/4/12 by Freeborn because: Add ETA
How many of those 8775 gun related crimes that occurred in the US were for self defense? Defense of others?
Collecting every single gun does not end the presence as criminals will find a way of getting one, as they do in the UK.
As opposed to non American posters butting into all sorts of threads taking the US to task and arguing the 2nd amendment is not needed or warranted?
ok....
Originally posted by Freeborn
Is self-defence a crime in the USA?
I've seen many a post here on ATS where people assure me that if someone breaks in to your property or tries to assualt you etc then you are fully entitled to use your firearm to protect yourself.
Originally posted by Freeborn
If that's so then surely such instances wouldn't be included in crime figures because by definition a crime is something that is against the law.
'Justified shootings' won't be included in crime figures.
Originally posted by Freeborn
Doesn't matter which way anyone tries to spin it the figures show that gun crime is proportionally far higher in the USA than it is in the UK.
Originally posted by Freeborn
Yes, I understand that, but remarkably few criminals in the UK use guns.
The few that do tend to use them in crimes against each other.
Any gun related crimes committed against law abiding citizens tend to become extremely high profile and those convicted of such crimes tend to be treat relatively severely.
Originally posted by Freeborn
Not at all, I'm sure they can be equally as pedantic, moralistic and patronising etc.
I just notice American posters popping up in completely unrelated threads stating that this wouldn't happen or that wouldn't happen if we had The Right To Bear Arms.
First of all, it would and it does and secondly it totally irrelevant.
Originally posted by Freeborn
Whilst there are many similarities between our nations and cultures etc there are also many differences.
Sometimes what is right for you is not right for us.
Sometimes what you want we don't want.
And vice versa.
I really don't see what's so hard about it all.
Originally posted by Freeborn
Please keep your Second Amendment if that's what you want - I certainly would never suggest that you should get rid of it - it's entirely up to you.
But by the same token stop trying to tell us what to do - we don't need it and we don't want it.
Originally posted by Freeborn
Far too many people wish and seek to impose their own morals and beliefs upon other people in this world.
Unfortunately that doesn't just apply to gun control etc but includes religion, politics and almost every aspect of life.
Originally posted by Freeborn
We all need to live and let live a bit more and stop being so concerend about what other people are doing.
Originally posted by Freeborn
Anyway, I'm out of this thread - one can only say the same thing so many times.
As for the higher stats in the US that happens when you compare a nation of 313 million to one of almost 62 million.
Yet the fact remains that even with strict gun control laws, criminals still obtain them and use them, regardless of what the consequences are. They are also used against law abiding citizens. I find it difficult to accept that gun crimes in the UK are all criminal on criminal.
If its something you never had then how can one dismiss the argument so quickly?
Its no different than coming into this thread and arguing criminal stats would be a lot lower if we got rid of guns.
I have not advocated for gun rights to be restored in the UK.
Those Americans who posted in the threads you refer to are no different than people who are from countries who do not have the right to own / possess a gun telling us the 2nd amendment is not needed.
I will agree that opinions can be taken as anything but when the facts used are incorrect. Did you not suggest the 2nd amendment is not needed?
Yeah that double standard has been around since the dawn of time.
I disagree on this point. That comment, concerned about others, is a double edged sword and is along the same lines of how people view the 2nd amendment while not completely understanding it or its roll in our history.
Does Switzerland face the same issues the US does when it comes to terrorism?
I have not seen any threats made against Switzerland yet I see a bunch made about the US. The US must take those threats as legitimate until proven otherwise.
Like your comment on the second - some positions are good for countries and that same position may not work for others.
Originally posted by captainnotsoobvious
reply to post by nenothtu
Sorry, but did Scandinavia manage to keep swords out of the hands of criminals?
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Again though only criminals break the law. Gun control laws apply to law abiding citizens, not criminals. Collecting every single gun does not end the presence as criminals will find a way of getting one, as they do in the UK.
Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by Xcathdra
How many of those 8775 gun related crimes that occurred in the US were for self defense? Defense of others?
Is self-defence a crime in the USA?
I've seen many a post here on ATS where people assure me that if someone breaks in to your property or tries to assualt you etc then you are fully entitled to use your firearm to protect yourself.
If that's so then surely such instances wouldn't be included in crime figures because by definition a crime is something that is against the law.
'Justified shootings' won't be included in crime figures.
Hope I've explained myself there.
Doesn't matter which way anyone tries to spin it the figures show that gun crime is proportionally far higher in the USA than it is in the UK.
Whilst there are many similarities between our nations and cultures etc there are also many differences.
Sometimes what is right for you is not right for us.
Sometimes what you want we don't want.
And vice versa.
I really don't see what's so hard about it all.
Please keep your Second Amendment if that's what you want - I certainly would never suggest that you should get rid of it - it's entirely up to you.
But by the same token stop trying to tell us what to do - we don't need it and we don't want it.
Far too many people wish and seek to impose their own morals and beliefs upon other people in this world.
Unfortunately that doesn't just apply to gun control etc but includes religion, politics and almost every aspect of life.
We all need to live and let live a bit more and stop being so concerend about what other people are doing.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Another interesting dilemma they will face is the constitution itself. On the off chance the 2nd amendment is repealed and we adopt the UN laws (hypothetical) I dont see how the guns can be collected / confiscated.
2nd is repealed, making gun ownership illegal for civilians. Law Enforcement can't just collect the guns as that would have 4th amendment implications. It would also run smack dab into ex post facto issues.
A law cannot be retroactive meaning the gun owners cannot be punished for being in possession of a gun.
Studies show that gun ownership rates affect gun deaths. States where a higher percentage of households have guns have higher rates of homicide and suicide than states where fewer households have guns.ii In addition, a report published by Mayors Against Illegal Guns found that states with higher rates of “crime gun exports” — where a firearm sold by a dealer in one state is later found at a crime scene in a different state — have higher rates of gun murders than states with lower rates of crime gun exports.iii That report also found a “strong association” between state crime gun export rates and the existence of laws regulating guns.iv For example, the average crime gun export rate of states that do not require the reporting of lost or stolen firearms is three times the average rate of states that do require reporting.v
In addition to these studies, our ranking reveals that many of the states with the strongest gun laws also have the lowest gun death rates. Conversely, many states with the weakest gun laws have the highest gun death rates. Although it is beyond the scope of this publication to demonstrate a causal relationship between state gun laws and gun death rates, the data provides support for the argument that gun laws are a significant factor in a state’s rate of gun deaths.vi More research is needed to determine the precise relationship between state gun laws and gun death rates.
Guess what city is in the top ten, safety wise in the US: New York.
The others:
Boston
Columbus, Ohio
Louisville, KY
Minneapolis, Minn
Portland, Ore
San Francisco
Seattle
Tampa, Fla
Virginia Beach, Va.
Now that includes all things related to injuries, not just crime.
For Just crime, go here:
www.morganquitno.com...
What do you see?
So by moving somewhere with weaker gun laws you actually INCREASED your chances of being a victim of gun related crime
In the 50+ plus years I've lived all over the US, I have never personally known of a single person killed with a gun.