It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I thought that was the boom housing on a military tanker aircraft..............?
Didnt you hear the lady clearly state that it was no airliner....?(famous footage of plane striike......
Lots of statements to that effect by eye witnesses.......)
Nobody has satisfactorily explaned the presence of the E4B in the air over the whole freaking show that day either ,....But it is a command and control aircraft and more......
During testing of the first of four tankers destined for Italy in 2005, Boeing discovered that the pylons used to hold wing refueling pods created airflow problems at high speeds.
Originally posted by homervb
Originally posted by onthedownlow
Originally posted by zatara
Originally posted by tonycodes
reply to post by Master_007
I understand your fustrations but please let's keep this to focusing on the cylinder... I do not wanna feed this thread with a ton of different topics thank you
I can only guess what it could be and my quess will be a liquid with stuff that can melt steel. And in enough quantity to take out an entire floor of the WTC.
Are you suggesting that only one floor would need to be compromised? I thought the heart of the truther movement believed that multiple floors would need to be compromised. But, gee, I guess your right- However many hundreds of thousands of tons that were reliant on the integrity of that one floor could have easily come down if that one floor was compromised. But what kind of compromise? A high velocity impact and extreme heat from jet fuel?
A high velocity impact and extreme heat from jet fuel would totally take down an entire building causing every entire floor below the impact to eject outwards in perfect unison, one after another, while keeping up with falling debris from the top. Yeah man, a plane and it's semi empty gas tank would totally do that. Don't forget to take into account the fuel that burned up in that massive fireball too.
Originally posted by Mianeye
reply to post by ANOK
How about the building is in front of the plane and not behind it, watch it again
Originally posted by GrinchNoMore
reply to post by ANOK
Oh for sure !! You do not want to be ANYTHING other than the official conspiracy theories, or for that matter, whatever 700 theories that Good ol' Dave says happened either.
Originally posted by Six Sigma
Fellow NWO Shills: Do we get compensation for posting in No- planer and pod plane threads?
Thanks, Langley finance department isn't returning my emails.