It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In 1992, a 5-day conference was held at M.I.T. to examine "the findings of various investigators studying people who report experiences of abductions by aliens, and the related issues of the phenomenon." The conference was chaired by M.I.T.'s Professor of Physics David Pritchard and late Harvard Medical School Professor of Psychiatry John Mack. Alien Discussions: Proceedings of the Abduction Study Conference Held at M.I.T. Cambridge, Ma.
The conference was covered by a well-regarded journalist, C. D. B. Bryan, who avowed non-belief in alien abduction. After the Abduction Study Conference, Bryan conducted extensive interviews. The work was published in the book "Close Encounters of the Fourth Kind: A Reporter's Notebook on Alien Abduction, UFOs, and the Conference at M.I.T." (also audio cassette).
At the end of a chapter reporting his interviews with two of the most credible "experiencers," Bryan stated:
During the days immediately following the conference, I am struck by how my perception of the abduction phenomenon has changed: I no longer think it a joke. This is not to say I now believe UFOs and alien abduction are real -- "real" in the sense of a reality subject to the physical laws of the universe as we know them -- but rather that I feel something very mysterious is going on. And based as much on what has been presented at the conference as on the intelligence, dedication, and sanity of the majority of the presenters, I cannot reject out-of-hand the possibility that what is taking place isn't exactly what the abductees are saying is happening to them. And if that is so, the fact that no one has been able to pick up a tailpipe from a UFO does not mean UFOs do not exist. It means only that UFOs might not have tailpipes. As Boston University astronomer Michael Papagiannis insisted, "The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence." (Bryan 1995, 230)
The first paragraph says the phenomena is defunct.
Originally posted by nineix
Edit: earlier in describing fetus removal I cited removal accounts occurring at third trimester, where 'third' is a typo.
I cannot edit that post directly now, so, I'm adding this update/Edit.
Accounts, as I understand it, report fetus removal in forcefully impregnated women around the end of First trimester, or during early second.
Apologies if there's been any confusion on that.
Many will ascribe these pregnancies/sudden non-pregnancies, to simple miscarriage, usually in attribution to the young ages of the girls/women involved.
This may indeed be the case, but, as suggested earlier, having subjects on hand in a controlled, safe, live-in, monitored environment could give us information on this front, especially where a child, or children are brought to full term and birth successfully with all in good health, unharmed.
Yeah exactly, Oven! I believe those who claim alien abduction know deep deep down that what they claim is not real! The FACT (& it is a fact) that NONE have managed to put forward anything at all that could be classed as hard evidence in the slightest is proof to the likes of you & I that the alien abduction phenom is pure fantasy! I've been studying this phenom for decades now & not one-- NOT ONE of these alleged abductees have ever taken the time & effort to made any REAL attempt at gaining proper 1st person data-- yet they take the time & effort to sit & type out what they claim has happened to them in books/ places like this etc! How does the world know about this phenom? Purely through stories, nothing more.. & in my opinion this is the way it will be for eternity! I hope I'm wrong, I really do-- nothing would give me greater pleasure than first contact with unknown sentient beings. As long as they are not an alien version of Al-Qaeda of course! I just say it as I see it, nothing more..
Originally posted by TheOven
The OP was talking about video.
That's a laugh when people can't even provide any type of documentation to back up even the simplest of claims made by abduction believers.
reply to post by MoreThanTheSum
Here's a video I think you'll find interesting: www.cosmic-conspiracies.com... Scroll about 2/3 of the way down and watch the video--then let me know what you think. I for one think it's real, but of course, like everything else on this forum, that is for you to decide.
During the days immediately following the conference, I am struck by how my perception of the abduction phenomenon has changed: I no longer think it a joke. This is not to say I now believe UFOs and alien abduction are real -- "real" in the sense of a reality subject to the physical laws of the universe as we know them -- but rather that I feel something very mysterious is going on. And based as much on what has been presented at the conference as on the intelligence, dedication, and sanity of the majority of the presenters, I cannot reject out-of-hand the possibility that what is taking place isn't exactly what the abductees are saying is happening to them. And if that is so, the fact that no one has been able to pick up a tailpipe from a UFO does not mean UFOs do not exist. It means only that UFOs might not have tailpipes. As Boston University astronomer Michael Papagiannis insisted, "The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence."
Originally posted by MasonicFantom
They'd want to keep their experience quiet because of certain close-minded morons
See what i mean-- why did you feel the need to mention it for a closed minded moron like me to see
Originally posted by MasonicFantom
This is not being a defeatist. This is being a realist (coming from someone who was abducted before).