It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
MONTEVIDEO, March 30 (Reuters) - Uruguay will ask Iran if the South American country can export rice in exchange for oil, the government said on Friday.
Iran used to be a major destination for Uruguayan rice but the impact of U.S. and EU sanctions, aimed at curbing Tehran's nuclear ambitions, has put a strain on financing.
"If Iran is willing to barter oil for rice we will do it and we will take out currency from (the operation)," said Agriculture Minister Tabare Aguerre.
Pressure from Washington and Brussels, which will slap a EU-wide embargo on Iranian oil from July as part of a campaign against Tehran's nuclear program, has led to a rally in oil prices this year as markets fear supply shortages.
Barack Obama is set to impose penalties on India for continuing to purchase oil from sanction-strapped Iran. A vague new U.S. law seeks also to sanction any country that is not willing to reduce its purchase of Iranian oil.
India's Oil Minister has stated that they will continue to purchase from Iran as needed for their growing energy demands, while perhaps turning to gold as a means of sidestepping any attempt at imposing sanctions.
This could be merely a face-saving measure, as other players in the region including China, Japan, and South Korea have taken quick measures to reduce imports following U.S. demands. Once again, the U.S. proves that ally or not, every sovereign nation must cave to Washington's imperial objectives, or else.
Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
reply to post by jude11
"American officials are quoted as saying that they are worried India may side-step payment restrictions." (at the 10 second mark)
Is it about the oil or the currency used to pay for it? I can't quite work it out. Maybe that's why they resort to exchange of goods rather than currency. Meddling in any case.
Iran has attained 90% self-sufficiency in essential agricultural products, although rice production fails to meet domestic demand thereby making substantial imports necessary. In 2007 Iran reached self-sufficiency in wheat production and for the first time became a net wheat exporter.[128] By 2003, a quarter of Iran's non-oil exports were of agricultural products.[129] Major exports in this category include fresh and dried fruits, nuts, animal hides, processed foods, and spices.
Originally posted by muse7
What America is doing can be considered Economic terrorism that will ultimately end up hurting the innocent people of Iran.
I hope more nations follow Uruguay, and send food to Iran in exchange for oil.edit on 4/1/2012 by muse7 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
A quick scan of wikipedia shows that rice is the only thing they do import as far as food goes.
Iran has attained 90% self-sufficiency in essential agricultural products, although rice production fails to meet domestic demand thereby making substantial imports necessary. In 2007 Iran reached self-sufficiency in wheat production and for the first time became a net wheat exporter.[128] By 2003, a quarter of Iran's non-oil exports were of agricultural products.[129] Major exports in this category include fresh and dried fruits, nuts, animal hides, processed foods, and spices.
Seems like someone doesn't like their success, just like a certain other oil-producing, dollar-shunning country that was recently invaded.
Sourceedit on 1/4/12 by LightSpeedDriver because: Clarification
Originally posted by frazzle
reply to post by SplitInfinity
I am not worried about owing Money to China as the Chinese have put themselves in the Vulnerable Possition...not the U.S.
I'm not sure how our loans from China came up here, but ...
Maybe you should factor into your conclusion what would be the result if China redirected even a small percentage of its normal US exports to other countries (like Iran and the BRICS nations) who would be willing to deal in currencies other than the dollar and how that would impact the US economy which depends so heavily on imported goods and consumerism to keep it afloat. It would definitely be interesting to see how US consumers would react to not being able to purchase many of the products they have come to expect to find on their store shelves. Oh yeah, they could hurt us.
Are you kidding? In the event that cheap Chinese Labor Subsidised Products are not available in the U.S.....it would create a Job Boom the likes that have never been seen in the United States....it could only HELP US!
Split Infinity
Originally posted by frazzle
reply to post by SplitInfinity
Are you kidding? In the event that cheap Chinese Labor Subsidised Products are not available in the U.S.....it would create a Job Boom the likes that have never been seen in the United States....it could only HELP US!
Split Infinity
That sounds good, but what about the reasons manufacturers left the US in the first place ~ regulations and high taxes. That hasn't gone away just because they left for friendlier bases of operation. Unless the depreciating value of the US dollar and laws that make being in business in America so difficult are dealt with in a serious manner, people wouldn't buy those higher priced products anyway, they have become addicted to cheap stuff.
Why do we always think we can force other countries to do ~ or not do ~ things against their best interests in order to fix our internal problems? Oh wait, I just remembered why, might makes right.
Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
reply to post by SplitInfinity
Personally I'm hoping the Rossi e-cat will change things. The latest post on his site mentions $10 for a megawatt of electricity. Fingers crossed things change very soon for the whole planet. It's long been time to break some unnecessary shackles on a basic human need that has been exploited by the few and greedy for so long.
Peace.