It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by cranspace
Good point
OP: Is this about the idea that some members have that there is a planet approaching us from the direction of the South Pole? A planet that they claim we cannot see because it can only be seen from the South Pole area?
They must be all Bonkers because if a Planet was on a collision course with earth someone some where would see it to say this can be only observed at the south pole is guff
Unless it was the size of a ping pong ball then it really would not matter
y know
Cran
It's possible they're just being obtuse, or just playing an elaborate joke on the ignorant.
The world is always ending, according to someone out there. The current environment is full of those who think the end is nigh–at least for the robust global economy to which we’ve grown accustomed. Let’s suppose that our economy is about to fall off a cliff, resulting in general chaos, what’s the average investor supposed to do? The answer is a bit of an oxymoron: profit from doomsday capitalism. Even the most pessimistic of the bunch can appreciate the investment options available at their fingertips which could pay off big time if (when?)our political and financial systems deteriorate (see Doomsday Special: 7 Hard Asset Investments You Can Hold In Your Hand).
Originally posted by stereologist
The entire 2012 thread is filled with many simple as well as complicated misunderstandings. Some of the misunderstandings deal with archaeological issues such as mixing Aztec with Mayan cultures or thinking that other cultures other than the Maya mention 2012.
Here I'd like to point out a recurring mistake concerning the South Pole. Countless threads and posts within threads suggest that it is possible to "sneak" up on the Earth by approaching directly at the South Pole.
It is unclear to me why no threads claim that the same can be done for the North Pole. Why can't an object apply the same trickery at the other end of the Earth?
Is it because there is a telescope at the South Pole and not one at the North pole?
Originally posted by stereologist
I created the following image to illustrate what happens. The disc at the top represents the Earth and the poles are marked North and South. The object approaching Earth is the black dot. It could be a craft or an asteroid. That doesn't matter.
The colored lines show parts of the Earth where someone on the black dot could see different parts of the Earth. Someone at those spots could also the the dot. The black tangent lines show the limits of where someone could be on Earth and see the dot. The Earth disc is marked with a gray area where someone could not see the dot and the "sea-clouds" part of the disc could see the dot.
A distant dot could be viewed by 1/2 of the Earth's surface. Since the dot is approaching the pole and the Earth rotates on that axis, then only that region of the Earth can see the dot.
What makes me curious is why this is not clear? Is there something I have overlooked in describing the situation?
Originally posted by cloaked4u
Let me sum it up. INCOMMING SHOCKWAVE. So tell me, can you see a shockwave, brother.
Originally posted by luxordelphi
The Antarctic (south pole) is almost unpopulated compared to the Arctic (north pole.)
Originally posted by chr0naut
reply to post by stereologist
They probably don't know about the European Southern Observatory or the Australian National Telescope/Compact Array and the soon to be completed Square Kilometer Array, not to mention major observatories in every state and the thousands of amateur astronomers from the Southern latitudes.
The people who believe in stealth planet-spaceships/dwarf stars have not necessarily got the education, experience or intelligence to realize that such things are highly unlikely.
edit on 2/4/2012 by chr0naut because: too many 't's in latittttttttttttttttudes!
Originally posted by luxordelphi
reply to post by aorAki
The bulk of the people in Antarctica are employed by governments. There is not an indigenous population there like there is in the Arctic. Also, the telescope array on the Antarctic Plateau is automated because even in summer the weather is very harsh.
Even with all of these constraints i.e. 90% of the world's population in the northern hemisphere, 2 million people in the Arctic as compared to a sparse population of government employees in Antarctica - there are a lot of videos of objects on You Tube and a lot of pictures of objects on the web from New Zealand and Australia.
"These warp-speed planets would be some of the fastest objects in our galaxy. If you lived on one of them, you'd be in for a wild ride from the center of the galaxy to the universe at large," said astrophysicist Avi Loeb of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics