It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Cuervo
Originally posted by CaptainNemo
Originally posted by Cuervo
Originally posted by CaptainNemo
Well, one can argue, that had not the serpent [Disassociation with Satan] lied to Eve, all the plagues, deaths, and sorrow attributed to God would have never happened.
But the serpent didn't lie. In fact, the serpent was the only one who told them the truth. He told her that they would gain knowledge. God told them they would die. After they ate of it, they gained knowledge, God got scared, and they didn't die.
The serpent said they would be like gods. What did god say about it after they ate it? In Genesis 3:22, he said "The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever."
So who lied?
Where are you getting that from?
'And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:' - Genesis 3:4
God said they would die, but he didn't say when. Adam and Eve eventually died.
The serpent lied/..
"But he didn't say when". Hahah! So if I said "if you eat that cookie, you will surely die" and you die decades later, I'm right?!
They were obviously talking about the consuming of it killing them, which it "surely" did not. The only reason they eventually died was because God was nervous of their power and did not let them eat of the immortality tree.
If you were to read the whole account with an unbiased mind and only looked at the factual statements, you would conclude:
1. God said the fruit would kill them
2. Serpent said the fruit would give them knowledge
3. They ate the fruit
4. They gained knowledge
5. They were not killed
6. God got scared and made their lives worse
If this were a children's book that you had no vested interest in, this would be the only conclusion that could be logically made.
Originally posted by EvilSadamClone
reply to post by NoRegretsEver
Religious people don't debate. They preach in an attempt to shout dissention down.
Originally posted by Dynamike
And all of these points for argument disappeared the moment that man achieved scientific knowledge that freed him from the binds of this ancient, simple minded way of thinking. The moments that man excavated bone structures of his prehistoric ancestors that proved that he was not merely created on a whim, but fought for survival and adapted over millions of years. Then man gained knowledge of his own DNA, the map of his genetic inheritance. By studying this map man became aware where his early relatives branched off and his earlier ones came from.
Or you can still believe that none of these achievements are true and just read a 2,000 year old book that tells you that man was created perfect and then a woman was extracted from his rib because he was lonely... I can list a thousand conundrums resulting from this line of thinking. Such as:
"If people could live forever, could they reproduce?" What happens when they overpopulate the earth?" "What happens when the food supply runs out?" "What happens when man goes into outer space and jumps out of his space ship? He cant die so then what? How does his body disobey the mere fabric of the universe?"
I could type forever at the fallacy of this logic.
Originally posted by flexy123
Don't forget that Satan is also the one who punishes all the bad people.
If he were evil, why is he punishing the bad people in his hell?
That being said, i don't give a lot about the Bible and what it says since i have HIGH doubts that the Bible really contains "words of god" or from Jesus for that matter. The bible was written by people and stuff was put in and left out at will. There is more bias and agenda in the bible than truth - it's an instrument for controlling people as is institutionalised religion.