It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Stratfor leak: Assassination of Obama?(by Wayne Madsen)

page: 1
5
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 05:59 PM
link   
Hi-Well, This is damn interesting. Here's the link:
www.opinion-maker.org...#

An excerpt:

It is a February 22, 2010 e-mail from Burton that should be causing the most concern for the U.S. Secret Service, which is charged with protecting the life of the President of the United States, Burton writes: "One can look at MOSSAD's recent covert activities and get a sense of their mindset. I also think they will assassinate A-Dogg. His helo will have a
malfunction."

Thoughts?




posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 06:01 PM
link   
Obama assassination = SHTF

If a white guy does it, expect a race war or a failed attempt at one.



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 06:02 PM
link   
If Mossad decides to perform an "adjustment", telltale signs would be the Secret Service moving out of the way before it happens -- aka the Dallas Maneuver.



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 06:05 PM
link   
I am white and it wouldn't fail because the whites would follow me. Duh.



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 06:09 PM
link   
I've been thinking about something like this a lot, so anyone here might help. As US citizens, aren't we legally allowed to overthrow a government or president by force if they don't follow the Constitution or commit various crimes? If he is assassinated, would that incite civil war, or would it be justifiable as long as the majority stood with the decision?

As interesting as the subject is, I don't follow law as closely as I should.



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 06:19 PM
link   
reply to post by Figzer
 


Its wrong to want to harm the President, stop him from destroying the country definitely, but harm no.

I really don't like Mr. Obama, the person presently installed as POTUS. I would never want to harm him, although I wouldn't be sad if he decided not to run again



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 06:30 PM
link   
The idea that "A-Dogg" is the Prez is an analysis by the article writer, not a direct reference to what Burton said. The writer even admits A-Dogg could mean a couple of other people. Obama is not the only one who rides around in a helicopter. Even the King of Jordan does that, though he flies it himself. The article writer makes a great many assumptions and accusations towards Burton and Friedman, none of which are attributed. In other words, this is a leftist opinion piece. Nothing wrong with that, but this is not objective analysis in any sense of the word. Use accordingly.



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 06:40 PM
link   
Firstly, we are talking a company that sells information.......
secondly they have to keep the buyers thinking they have the ears of high placed sources and can access the real scoop on what the top guys are thinking of doing next.........
So id expect a certain amount of BS piled on the right doorsteps to keep up their image.
It is hard foe somebody like me to know if tis guy hands out with Bibi, or not....
Maybe he has shaken the guys hand in public before...but these are heavy things for even Bibi to be blabbing to anyone but his shaving mirror.....
Rabidly pro survival as the Ysraeli nation is, they probably have contingency plans for all kinds of assassinations as a matter of who gets elected anywhere in the world.....
Threats to Ysrael can come from anywhere, anytime,cant they?
having a small military they would be fools not to plan such operations which are force multiplying in the maximum for a small country.
We do know this, The leadership of Ysrael will never let the state be destroyed or conquered without using their entire nuclear arsenal first on whoever is attacking.
This you better believe.......whack a sitting pres? maybe....
Whack a potential pres?
I think you bet! if it was a propituous hit.



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 06:51 PM
link   
reply to post by calnorak
 


Believe me, I would never wish harm on anyone. However, there are circumstances where if a message can be displayed to the world, it should be done. We know he's not our leader, he doesn't make the decisions, and he's only technically responsible for thousands of deaths, but planting a flag in his chest would tell the f'ers that be that we're getting serious. We're running out of time.


Cooper Lee Judd: The depictions on life from big coperate sponsorships... The Depictions from world leaders are similar among these lines.. If you the vision of a "perfect women..." bald, skinless, and a womb cold as a skinless frog winter... (words of a metal band hailing from Germany "Heaven Shall Burn - Look them up, purely heartfelt, honest band...) if your perfect vision is of a man, starving outside a cathedral... as well as all other deprivations setting in to meet their surfaces.. (basically - physical appearances...) Then your too sick to run a society, numberless being inside of society. .. I mean - its just a standard of world under the illusion of abnegation...

This is important... Violence in humanities name has done a critical blow to those who are true blooded... I mean, honesty, loyalties, inner peace, and unity.... This brings prosperity with limitless potentials... Why would anyone want to see a young women pass of cancer? why would anyone watch their local homeless man starve - and find comfort in their dispositions...? Its parasitic... And allow me to be more forward... if all you can do... is save yourself, and save your own life... then how can you love? respect? understand anyone else outside yourself? Sit on that... And tell me the answer isn't selfish, blinded, and deafen to our needs, and wants to pursuit happiness?


[Editor's Note] Here you have two opinions from two contributors. Enjoy.



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 06:56 PM
link   
I read this earlier, I didn't think it had anything to do with Obama though. "A-Dogg"??

Assad?

Not sure why it is implied that it would be Obama from the source...

These two??:


While Burton may have been referring to either Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad or Ayatollah Khamenei in his reference to "A-Dogg" having a "helo malfunction," courtesy of Mossad


Even the source admits it's being a little far fetched...



edit on 31-3-2012 by boncho because: (no reason given)

edit on 31-3-2012 by boncho because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 07:00 PM
link   
reply to post by schuyler
 


They might also mean the President of Iran actually.



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 07:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by schuyler
The idea that "A-Dogg" is the Prez is an analysis by the article writer, not a direct reference to what Burton said. The writer even admits A-Dogg could mean a couple of other people. Obama is not the only one who rides around in a helicopter. Even the King of Jordan does that, though he flies it himself. The article writer makes a great many assumptions and accusations towards Burton and Friedman, none of which are attributed. In other words, this is a leftist opinion piece. Nothing wrong with that, but this is not objective analysis in any sense of the word. Use accordingly.


Hard to know, but, madsen mentions the racial overtones of that comment (A-Dogg, think snoop dogg, meaning black), so I don't think ahmandinjad or assad really fits..

edit on 31-3-2012 by LightsideAssassin because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 07:08 PM
link   


As US citizens, aren't we legally allowed to overthrow a government or president by force if they don't follow the Constitution or commit various crimes?


No one who didn't oppose Bush destroying the constitution and breaking countless laws has no right to wish anything against Obama.



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 07:23 PM
link   
reply to post by CB328
 


Bush was the first of my generation to openly attack America. From what I've seen, the majority of protesters were like me; too young to notice. We're taught to ignore the past and rely on the government to push forward.



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 07:46 PM
link   
reply to post by Figzer
 


We're smarter now



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 07:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by Figzer
reply to post by Figzer
 


We're smarter now


I hope so. Still, I wish we didn't need words like kill, assassin and others like that.



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 08:05 PM
link   
I think Mr. Madsen is barking up the wrong tree on this one...and went way too far out on a limb.


b) Special internal codewords : Hizzies or HZ - Hizbollah Izzies or IZ - Israel A-dogg - Mahmoud Ahmadinajad,

from wikileaks

more A-dogg...


A separate email dated January 25, 2010, also refers to the death of Masoud Ali Mohammadi. Based on a conversation with a former colleague of Masoud Ali Mohammadi, a Stratfor employee wrote, “He thinks A-dogg‘s [Mahmoud Ahmadinajad] camp had him whacked and thinks HZ [Hizbollah] operatives did it.”

This email also contained the following statement: “Ali Mohammadi was a true believer of the system, but when A-dogg came to power he began to lose faith in the system and started to become more politically active. Ali Mohammadi started to become really active about three years ago and would gather students for rallies.”

source



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 08:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by Gorsebeacon
I am white and it wouldn't fail because the whites would follow me. Duh.


Are we a bit full of ourselves perhaps........



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 08:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by Figzer
reply to post by Figzer
 


We're smarter now


No, we're more radicalized--not smarter. This thread has serious bad overtones. Some of you guys are getting seriously freaky. This is not a good thing.

The two main issues here are these:

1. The source of this story is seriously not objective. You've got a guy here who really has no idea what Burton is saying trying to bring his cfred to bear on the problem from his own politically bioased perspective.All I'm saying is, this guy has an agenda. Recognize it.

2. Stratfor has some serious credibility issues itself. They'd like to be seen as some bad-azz private CIA so they can sell year long subscriptions for $350 a pop, but consider. Burton was a State Department courier. He went around with a briefcase handcuffed to his wrist. He wasn't "covert" in any sense of the term. Have you ever heard Burton talk? He comes across with the most inane serious statements like the way you tie your shoelaces has infinite importance. (I tie mine backwards, so I'm sensitve to this subject.
)

Part of the game is to pretend you're tight with the guys who actually DO things. "Me n'BB; we're tight!" Especially in light of how badly they got hacked, they've got some serious damage control to do. (In some previous articles sorry, have to research an hour to pull them back up) the issue put forward is that Stratfior is seen as a bit of a joke.

So what you have here is two organizations who just may not be the sharpest knives in the drawer. I think it would be a serious mistake to come to any iron-clad conclusions here.



posted on Apr, 1 2012 @ 01:03 AM
link   
reply to post by LightsideAssassin
 


They could be referring to the other government leaders you left out of your post. The article itself seems to be nothing more than gossip and speculation.


While Burton may have been referring to either Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad or Ayatollah Khamenei in his reference to "A-Dogg" having a "helo malfunction," courtesy of Mossad, the spelling of "Dogg" indicates a racial reference. Burton spells "dog" as "Dogg," a likely reference to the rapper "Snoop Dogg." The "A" in "A-Dogg" would indicate that he referring to an "A" or "top Dog," a possible reference to President Obama. Nevertheless, Ahmadinejad and Khamenei do occasionally travel around Iran by helicopter.


Anyone who is intrested I recommend you research what it takes to be a member of the security / maintenance detail assigned to any tpe of transportation the US President takes. AirForce One is essentially stripped ompletely down and rebuilt from the ground up every so often to ensure everything is working as it should be. To date we have never lost a President to a "transportation failure".


edit on 1-4-2012 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
5
<<   2 >>

log in

join