It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Zimmerman Verdict: Zimmerman a Free Man

page: 2
2
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 12:44 PM
link   
He was told by the police to not follow him.

The recorded 911 tape clearly says "we do not want you to follow him"

End of story... He was the aggressor and he's guilty no matter how it played out after that.




posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 12:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by thehoneycomb


I guess the media did a fast one on you, not me.


You are no better



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 12:46 PM
link   
reply to post by braindeadconservatives
 


If he had a gun, Zimmerman would have disarmed him immediately.

In any case I'm sure that will come out in court.
edit on 31-3-2012 by thehoneycomb because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 12:47 PM
link   
I wish that the media would stop trying people in the public period and wait until after the trial is over to report it.

And as for me i'm not going to discuss it at all until the trial is over.



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 12:48 PM
link   
Come on people, this thread is not about Zimmerman or what happened. It is about how the public, media and politicians will react if they don't get the guilty verdict that they so badly want.

There are other threads for discussing the actual case I believe. This is not one of them. Please stay on topic.



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 12:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by thehoneycomb
reply to post by braindeadconservatives
 


Just a couple of points.

There are images of Martin that support this. The idea that he was in fact involved in gang activity.


I haven't read all the Zimmerman/Martin threads because they are really getting out of hand now, why do we need another one? Could this not of been posted on one of the many Pro Zimmerman threads instead?

Also, just becuase someone looks gangsta in a picture, doesn't make them gangsta. It's the fashion these days for many youngsters. Have you seen the majority of photographs kids around his age stick up on social network sites these days?

Shall we label them all gangsta?


edit on 31-3-2012 by skitzspiricy because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 12:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by thehoneycomb
reply to post by Damrod
 





THERE IS NO EVIDENCE D'B. It's the word of a living guy against a dead guy and a couple of "johnny come lately on the scene" supposed-maybe heard or saw something" possible witnesses...which I find high on the scale of bs.


Good thing your not the judge or jury. You already declared the witnesses BS in favor of your own opinion.

I guess the media did a fast one on you, not me.


The witnesses suddenly appear weeks later after the shiz hits the fan....



yeah...that's credible....

are you on medication or what? Never mind.

The continuation of this media trial goes against everything I stand for...it is not "your" call....it is not the call of the MSM...it is the call of the Grand Jury and the available "untainted" evidence. "Evidence" submitted after the fact is weak at best and twisted at worst.

These people popping out of the woodwork are playing to the cameras....like that worthless dude back in the OJ Simpson trials....15 minutes of fame dude....learn to know your species...we are pitiful and yet predictable.



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 12:55 PM
link   
reply to post by thehoneycomb
 


It's still a way of trying the people in public, which is why I'm loathe to post about it. Besides, it's obvious what will happen. If he is not guilty the black community and leaders will protest because he must be found guilty of killing a kid. So there's really no need to discuss what is so obvious.

And your title is entirely misleading.



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 12:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by thehoneycomb
reply to post by braindeadconservatives
 


If he had a gun, Zimmerman would have disarmed him immediately.

In any case I'm sure that will come out in court.
edit on 31-3-2012 by thehoneycomb because: (no reason given)


There is going to be no court
atleast there should not be one
have you not read the thread come on
all this non-sense has been blown out of the water
with hard evidence and facts.
edit on 31-3-2012 by popsmayhem because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 12:59 PM
link   
Without better witnesses we will never know the truth of the matter. The real problem lies in the Florida law that allowed such a thing to happen. That is where the debate is and should be. Mr. Zimmerman may or may not be a guilty man and if he is guilty of a crime he may well remain a free man and get away with it due to lack of evidence. Again you must turn to the laws that allowed this to happen and address the issue there.



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 01:03 PM
link   
reply to post by popsmayhem
 


I'm not saying their will or not be court and if he is innocent than yeah why would there be?

But their could be a various number of lawsuits.

The media is not letting up on this story, and once it's official, some will see it as a call for civil unrest.

Also there is a bit of using this case to pass other laws.

I saw a story on TV that stated that Zimmerman had an incident with the police that should have been a felony but he was charged with a misdemeanor, so theres that. And what if they try to disallow gun sales for people with misdemeanors?



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 01:10 PM
link   
Lets start putting the real terrorist
on trial then. The muslim terrorists in
this country, the ones we know are terrorist,
but can't quite prove it.
damn them they have to come up with real evidence to
do anything with them. Then you go down a slippery
slope.
Lets start putting our weird neighbor on trial because
someone saw them posting on ATS.
edit on 31-3-2012 by popsmayhem because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 01:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by thehoneycomb
reply to post by braindeadconservatives
 


If he had a gun, Zimmerman would have disarmed him immediately.

In any case I'm sure that will come out in court.
edit on 31-3-2012 by thehoneycomb because: (no reason given)


Uh, or there would have been a shoot out.

there was no second gun, Zimmerman had the gun, he had the part of the equation that
made the encounter deadly.



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 01:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by popsmayhem

Originally posted by thehoneycomb
reply to post by braindeadconservatives
 


If he had a gun, Zimmerman would have disarmed him immediately.

In any case I'm sure that will come out in court.
edit on 31-3-2012 by thehoneycomb because: (no reason given)


There is going to be no court
atleast there should not be one
have you not read the thread come on
all this non-sense has been blown out of the water
with hard evidence and facts.
edit on 31-3-2012 by popsmayhem because: (no reason given)


There is no hard evidence but a gun and a corpse, you keep making things up.



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 01:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by thehoneycomb
reply to post by Char-Lee
 


Gee thats a bit silly. Because I used a misleading title that everybody under the sun knows is not a present day scenario, you discredit everything without considering it? Ok

ATS is a forum and any writer on this forum knows that the threads that get read have the best titles.

You could come up with a great title that is not a lie nor even misleading, if the subject interests anyone they will read it.



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 10:07 PM
link   
reply to post by braindeadconservatives
 



how can you act on the internet lol



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 10:17 PM
link   
This is being discussed in numerous threads, for example:

www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Please add further comments to the ongoing discussions in the above linked threads.
Thanks




**Thread Closed**




top topics



 
2
<< 1   >>

log in

join