It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JayDub113
In the words of my girlfriend "they are not even trying; that's not even airbrushed that's the erase tool."
And that about sums it up.
Originally posted by Helious
Does NASA and other space agencies airbrush in my opinion....? Yes. Is this an obvious airbrushed picture in my opinion..... No.
It is an image artifact created by the camera. All three pictures are affected in the same way citing most probably dust on the lens.
Originally posted by alfa1
Originally posted by JayDub113
In the words of my girlfriend "they are not even trying; that's not even airbrushed that's the erase tool."
And that about sums it up.
Everyone will ask for examination of the original images, and thats perfectly right, but your accusation can be debunked even sooner.
Cant be the erase tool. There is real, actual detail in the area you speak of.
Basically, you the human viewer are seeing what you call "white", when actually there is still detail there.
Maybe your eyes are no good, maybe your monitor needs recalibration, but you cant blame NASA for that.
Originally posted by DJW001
So if it's not glare off a shiny flat rock, what do you think it is? And why would NASA airbrush the image rather than just not release the image at all?