It’s amazing seeing Russia Today (on behalf of a country, presently massively expanding, its nuclear programme) promoting anti-nuclear sentiment
amongst its English speaking, enemies…
MOSCOW, March 23 (Reuters) - Russia doubled foreign orders to build nuclear reactors last year and has a $50 billion order book for the next
decade despite jitters over atomic power following the Fukushima disaster, its nuclear power chief said on Friday.
State-owned Rosatom says it builds more nuclear plants worldwide than anyone else and feared that reactor meltdowns at Japan's Fukushima plant,
triggered by a tsunami last March, could have prompted customers to switch out of nuclear.
"We knew that we might be facing a year of losses and we would miss out, not only on boosting our contracts, but on keeping our existing contracts,"
Sergei Kiriyenko, a former prime minister who heads the nuclear monopoly, told reporters.
In reality, he said, the volume of contracts to build nuclear plants abroad almost doubled last year thanks to demand from Asia
Why Russians Do This Quite Obvious…
Russia's nuclear chief says Japan exaggerating Fukushima crisis
SANYA, China -- The disaster at the Fukushima atomic power plant cannot be compared to Chernobyl, Russia's nuclear chief said Wednesday, suggesting
that Tokyo was exaggerating the emergency possibly for financial reasons.
1. More Russian made (cheap because it’s unsafe) exported to Europe.
2. Lower economic growth throughout the West
3. It does not affect their own nuclear, exporting, industries because they supply to 3rd world countries (Russian reactor designs are banned
throughout most of Europe) but it does help destroy their competitors (Western companies like Frances Avea and Britain’s Sellafield also offering to
export FAR safer reactors, to developing countries).
When you hear Russia join the anti-nuclear vote, only those of you most immune to reason, should fail to see you are being used –(for
pro-nuclear, but much less safe reactor, Russian export purposes).
NOBODY would Ever see this kind of reporting inside Russia (on a Russian speaking news service). The state would close it down –harass or even
murder those reporters (if it deemed “necessary”), because they know it’s a providing mixture of hysteria and one-sided info, against Russia’s
Which of course…
Is precisely why it exports one sided debate like the above video here (I didn’t see two sides on it, Did You?)
See also the defiant Russian reaction one month after:
By all means make up your own minds, but try to get used by the subversive (and actually pro-nuclear but anti safety) goals of another, pro-nuclear
What they didn’t tell you…
The only reason why some robots won’t work is because they are remote controlled, or contain computer chips vulnerable to ionising radiation. But in
Fukushima (as other reactors) there were robots that operated inside the reactor for decades
. The difference: All instructions to them are sent
by cable, along with electricity.
So whilst some robots won’t work, it is not impossible to design those that will. In fact: The Russians have already fully developed such robots
(used in Chernobyl), but probably omitted that from their reporting, for fear of giving Western audiences ant reassurances –remember our fear is of
vital assistance to their far more unsafe, practices.
edit on 090705 by Liberal1984 because: Grammar