It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Israelis Suspect Obama Media Leaks to Prevent Strike on Iran

page: 2
3
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 29 2012 @ 07:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by michaelbrux

Originally posted by Mkoll
About calling the Israeli government Jerusalem, it is like talking about American foreign policy by saying "Washington is doing X", or "Y from Washington", so I don't find that strange.

I agree with them though that is seems this administration is doing a lot to keep the Iran thing from happening despite the MSM hammering it into our brains day after day. It is something I actually applaud them for, even if it is merely to keep Obummer's chances of getting reelected up


not even the American government, Washington, recognizes Jerusalem as the Capital of Israel.

like i was trying to get across...an attack by Israel and an attack by Jerusalem are completely different. the question is...which is the world worried about.

and I don't think it was a mistake or stylistic choice on the part of the person that was quoted or by ABC news, but a deliberate use of the word signifying something different or changed from convention.

i could be wrong, being wrong isn't a major thing for me, but i felt it was noteworthy as i've never seen Jerusalem used in place of Israel in a manner which Moscow means Russia or Washington means the United States.

not trying to be alarming, just put it here for discussion.


This is Obamas way of correcting the stete department gaff they made about 2 days ago. The State Department announced that “Acting Under Secretary Kathleen Stephens Travels to Algeria, Qatar, Jordan, Jerusalem, and Israel.” They separated the two even though US law recognizes Jerusalem as the capitol.




posted on Mar, 29 2012 @ 07:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by michaelbrux
If you ask me, I think the attack has already begun. Hope they keep this nice and clean.


I hope so too for the inevitable retaliation.



posted on Mar, 29 2012 @ 07:31 PM
link   
reply to post by Skittle
 


you think there will be anyone left to retaliate?

sounds like wishful thinking to me.



posted on Mar, 29 2012 @ 07:44 PM
link   
OP: I got your meaning and it's interesting and smart that you caught it. However, it may be just political semantics or symbolism over substance reporting. Now, should you see new carpet and furniture moving into the Temple Mount......



posted on Mar, 29 2012 @ 08:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by Carseller4
Unbelievable...Israel works out a possible deal to launch strikes on Iran from Azerbaijan and the United States leaks this information?

This would be like Canada giving the Nazi's heads up about the invasion of Normandy.

What an inept President we have in the Oval Office.



Hey least he's trying to STOP a war and not start one. You should be grateful. Or do you need more innocent child blood on your hands?

Fool.



posted on Mar, 29 2012 @ 08:29 PM
link   
reply to post by mr-lizard
 


There are so many still, who allow their spiritual darkness to froth for more and more genocide and child horror, and more genocide and mass murder and child murder. The war hawks, all restless for every human on planet earth to be a blood sacrifice to their father the devil, the father of lies. The war hawks. Iran never did anything to us. I'm tired of repeating that to deaf ears. (Exasperation...)



posted on Mar, 30 2012 @ 08:30 AM
link   
reply to post by Saucerwench
 


i'm not sure its correct to say that Iran has never did anything...either they are doing plenty or someone else is doing plenty and making it so Iran is being blamed for it.

I saw an Iranian nuclear weapon in action back in April 2007 at the Great Lakes Naval Station. It seemed angry.



posted on Mar, 30 2012 @ 09:00 AM
link   
I see it as very much in Obama's best interests to delay any conflict until after the election. After that all hell can break loose.

Initiating a military action or coming to the aid of Israel will cost him plenty of votes.

Not responding to an attack on American assets, even if false flag, would cost him even more votes.

What to do, what to do. I sure do not envy him his position.



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 01:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by michaelbrux
reply to post by Saucerwench
 


i'm not sure its correct to say that Iran has never did anything...either they are doing plenty or someone else is doing plenty and making it so Iran is being blamed for it.

I saw an Iranian nuclear weapon in action back in April 2007 at the Great Lakes Naval Station. It seemed angry.






Care to share some more info about this? Or is it priveleged. Because if Iran did have nukes already there would be a war happening and since even America and Israel say that they do not have one but are trying to make one I wonder where you get your info from.



new topics

top topics



 
3
<< 1   >>

log in

join