It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Excerpted from Breitbart - If the Supreme Court strikes down Obamacare’s individual mandate (which is very likely after yesterday), will it also strike down President Obama’s entire 2,700-page law? The justices signaled they might do so during the third day of Supreme Court arguments.
Most of the time when part of a law is invalid, courts “sever” that part from the rest of the law and save the rest. This ruling of “severability” often coincides with the law at issue having a severability clause, where Congress declares that if part of the law if found unconstitutional, a court should save the rest. Courts can sever a law even without such a clause, but it gives the court more latitude because there’s no rock-solid indication that Congress wanted that outcome.
The Supreme Court has three issues when it comes to Obamacare. It can (1) totally sever the individual mandate section, retaining the other 450 sections; (2) partially sever the mandate, striking down some sections but keeping the rest, or (3) can hold the mandate “totally nonseverable” and strike down the entire Obamacare law.
The attorney for the challenger states and private businesses, Paul Clement, explained: “What makes this different is that the provisions that have constitutional difficulties or are tied at the hip to those provisions that have the constitutional difficulty are the very heart of this Act… they are interconnected to the exchanges, which are then connected to the tax credits, which are also connected to the employer mandates, which is also connected to some of the revenue offsets, which is also connected to Medicaid; if you follow that through what you end up with at the end of that process is just sort of a hollow shell.”
So in order to go the route of partial severability, the justices would have to go through Obamacare line by line, guessing which parts Congress would want to keep and which ones it would not.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Didn't the Dems insure they wrote in something to prevent the law from being struck down as a whole by a future Congress over the Mandate issue? I'd imagine that means absolutely nothing to the Supreme Court since the law is quite literally what the 9 of them say it is....but this could come as a real kick for Obama and Co.
I distinctly recall Pelosi and the others being so proud of themselves because they had designed this so it couldn't be undone. Well...I'm going to throw a small party at my place for a few like minded friends and we're getting drunk the night this ruling comes down. Either way.
If Obama gets his Care bill thrown back at him, it'll be an evening of celebration and joy. If SCOTUS chokes, then it'll be an evening of reflection and consideration of the future.
Either way...Oh Yes, the day this decision is handed down to the nation, I definitely will have a small party.
Originally posted by SrWingCommander
From all the talk I have heard, it the mandate is "severed", it would likely lead to a straight shot full court press in Congress to legislate "single payer", which is code for the government pays for ALL health care. This may infact be what they planned for. The more far left dems want just that, and this may have been the plan. But if the whole thing is thrown out, they may also throw a real wrench in their plans.
Pelosi, "We have to pass it to see what's in it"...........
Nancy Pelosi said, "But we have to pass the [health care ] bill so that you can find out what is in it."
Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli agreed with Greta Van Susteren that the entire Obamacare Law must be thrown out because Democrats removed the severability clause in the bill when they voted on it in the US Senate. Therefore, if the Supreme Court decides that the individual mandate is illegal, then they must throw out entire law.
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
As I mentioned in another thread, the real important issue here is what the SCOTUS said in regards to the constitutionality of single-payer healthcare. This opens the door to pass legislation down the road that allows people to participate in a government-backed program without a mandate.
So even though Obamacare may be overturned, this may have opened doors that the Republicans did not intent to open...and coming from conservative judges.
Originally posted by KeliOnyx
reply to post by SrWingCommander
Actually if this gets overturned most likely it will do two things to the election. It will put the right into complacency and motivate the left to vote. By getting this sweetheart deal for insurance companies taken out, makes a single payer system one of the few ways to go. Also if they strike only the mandate down it should be noted that the Government can simply require the States to mandate it if they want Federal funding.
Originally posted by xuenchen
reply to post by Indigo5
Somebody is saying that the Senate removed the severability clause.
(specifically the Democrats)
I can't find any verifiable sources as to who actually "sponsored" the removal.
My theory is that both sides may have ??
Originally posted by Indigo5
Originally posted by xuenchen
reply to post by Indigo5
Somebody is saying that the Senate removed the severability clause.
(specifically the Democrats)
I can't find any verifiable sources as to who actually "sponsored" the removal.
My theory is that both sides may have ??
It makes no sense that the Democrats would want to pull the severability clause...and without actual sources and simply blog etc. claims, I am still not buying it.
A Severability Clause specifically would have screwed the Insurance industry...Requiring them to insure everyone without a mandate. A Severability clause in the bill would have actually insured a second chance...and a good one...at the public option if the mandate was stricken down.
I can't logic any reason why the Democrats would pull the clause...and absent actual proof, I call BS.
Originally posted by zarp3333
Time will tell but this may be further proof that something BIG is happening. Given the facts about this case, any 12 year old would find the proposed law is unconstitutional on many levels. Yet until today, constitutionality seemed to have little effect on the supreme court's never ending war on civili liberty, state's rights and the concept of limiting federal power.
Maybe those self righteous son's of bitches are actually afraid they will be arrested for treason? Perhaps the fear of God and the wrath of citizens storming the Bastille has helped them to see the light?
For now, I will take any win we can get. Let's hope this is a preview of coming attractions. I am becoming more confident every day that 2012 will be the year of freedom.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Didn't the Dems insure they wrote in something to prevent the law from being struck down as a whole by a future Congress over the Mandate issue? I'd imagine that means absolutely nothing to the Supreme Court since the law is quite literally what the 9 of them say it is....but this could come as a real kick for Obama and Co.
I distinctly recall Pelosi and the others being so proud of themselves because they had designed this so it couldn't be undone. Well...I'm going to throw a small party at my place for a few like minded friends and we're getting drunk the night this ruling comes down. Either way.
If Obama gets his Care bill thrown back at him, it'll be an evening of celebration and joy. If SCOTUS chokes, then it'll be an evening of reflection and consideration of the future.
Either way...Oh Yes, the day this decision is handed down to the nation, I definitely will have a small party.