Triangle space ship

page: 1
1
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 28 2012 @ 07:21 PM
link   
I write this because i have seen a real triangle before,and this is why i am explaining this ,i am the source for all this information,it doesnt come from another soul on earth.

Humans of history should understand the reasons why the pyramids was actually made, and why the ‘Triangle Flying’ on the back of the dollar bill is so important to life it self.

Many races around the world built the pyramid, and its no secret as to why it was so imperitive to do so.

The Triangle race of aliens are not from this planet, but has used this planet for awful and atrocious experiments on humans, it was not until 1979 when the government stumbled upon the triangle race of alien, in what is known deep in the underground as the last base on earth, where they could actually abduct humans on the comfort of land. ‘Dulce’

Phil Snider comments from a lecture he did below




"Back in 1954, under the Eisenhower administration, the federal government decided to circumvent the Constitution of the United States and form a treaty with alien entities. It was called the 1954 Grenada Treaty, which basically made the agreement that the aliens involved could take a few cows and test their implanting techniques on a few human beings, but that they had to give details about the people involved. Slowly, the aliens altered the bargain until they decided they wouldn't abide by it at all. Back in 1979, this was the reality, and the fire-fight at Dulce occurred quite by accident.





My job was to go down the holes and check the rock samples, and recommend the explosive to deal with the particular rock. As I was headed down there, we found ourselves amidst a large cavern that was full of outer-space aliens, otherwise known as large Greys. I shot two of them. At that time, there were 30 people down there. About 40 more came down after this started, and all of them got killed. We had surprised a whole underground base of existing aliens. Later, we found out that they had been living on our planet for a long time, perhaps a million years. This could explain a lot of what is behind the theory of ancient astronauts


Nevertheless, before all this happened, there laid another event. Well two events that happened back to back.
'Kenneth Arnold'

These quotes are under the 'Bill Bequette' in wikipedia under keenoth arnold...i dont know how to embeed the wikpidia source thing...sorry.lol


He is best-known for making what is generally considered the first widely reported unidentified flying object sighting in the United States, after claiming to have seen nine unusual objects flying in a chain near Mount Rainier, Washington on June 24, 1947. (See Kenneth Arnold UFO sighting)





June 26 and June 27, newspapers first began using the terms "flying saucer" and "flying Herbert Strentz, who reviewed U.S. newspaper accounts of the Arnold UFO sighting, and concluded that the term was probably due to an editor or headline writer: the body of the early Arnold news stories did not use the term "flying saucer" or "flying disc."[15] However, earlier stories did in fact credit Arnold with using terms such as "saucer", "disk", and "pie-pan" in describing the shape.





Years later, Arnold claimed he told Bill Bequette that "they flew erratic, like a saucer if you skip it across the water." Arnold felt that he had been misquoted since the description referred to the objects' motion rather than their shape.[4] Thus Bequette has often been credited with first using "flying saucer" and supposedly misquoting Arnold, but the term does not appear in Bequette's early articles. Instead, his first article of June 25 says only, "He said he sighted nine saucer-like aircraft flying in formation..."





"they flew erratic, like a saucer if you skip it across the water."





TextArnold felt that he had been misquoted since the description referred to the objects' motion rather than their shape




TextThus Bequette has often been credited with first using "flying saucer" and supposedly misquoting Arnold


And 2 weeks after that...Roswell.in June or July 1947

The one thing about all of this is that this happened after world war 2




TextThe Second World War (often abbreviated as WWII or WW2), was


This information was delevered to me after i watched the triangle over my head.

The reason why I mentioned world 2.Because that is when Germanys secrets all came out, this is the only reason why they do not care if you believe in flying saucers. When Germany was crushed, they found out Germany was trying to duplicate a real Triangle space ship that was found in the 1800s ,and this is why they was building 'saucer like engines' underneath the triangle ,so it can levitate the enormous giant structure.

In the video below, they are trying to manipulate you all, they are trying to give you the reality of flying saucers, and they are trying to deceive you as Bill Banquette did in 1947.

The machine below was not going to be for used for ‘solo flying’ as it shows, and has been shown for the last zillion years.

Adolf Hitler was trying to build three engines underneath the triangle so it could fly. The saucer engines was going to be built for lifting purposes only, thats why the energy is from the bottom.

This video shows alot about theso called technology and also puts a little kennoth into it as well



This video shows the world that adolf was building a flying saucer but it is not true by my own personeel knowledge of flying triangles.


In the video below, this is a classic example of what every sighting on earth has described as far as a UFO.
The end of the video shows the 3 engines turning off, and as each engine turns off, they reflect every possible ufo sighting in the history of urology.
thisis just to let you know that cloaking and invisiblity is not to far behind.



The stars in the back ground have nothing to do with the ship.

this to me is a classic video of a flying triangle space ship turning its engines off after having them on.



In the every day language of ufology, this video will be presumed as three flying saucers flying together.

If the eyes does not see the first engine turn off, and only sees the two engines, then it will be presumed as two flying saucers, flying together.

If the eyes does not see the first two engines turn off, and only sees that one engine, then it will be presumed as a flying saucers or a probe.

The bottom of the triangle space ship gives the eyes the illusion because of the round shape,thats the only saucer that you see,and the triangle spaceship is the only ufo on earth.

edit on 28-3-2012 by LastProphet527 because: (no reason given)
edit on 28-3-2012 by LastProphet527 because: (no reason given)
edit on 28-3-2012 by LastProphet527 because: (no reason given)




posted on Mar, 28 2012 @ 07:35 PM
link   
Not a single Triangle UFO, but 3 craft flying in formation.

I also doubt the supposed 'Military' craft checking them out was anything but a normal helicopter going about its business, completely oblivious to the fact there are these 3 UFO above it.

Interesting video none the less.



posted on Mar, 28 2012 @ 08:00 PM
link   


This is fun too. yes this sort of directional replication ha sbeen a around for a while.

I believe old fighters used to have a light sesnor in the back that if hit would light a lamp at the front of the plane, since it had bright paint would blend to the forward lamp light making it very hard to see.



posted on Mar, 28 2012 @ 09:40 PM
link   
reply to post by LastProphet527
 

I strongly suspect your triangular UFO is actually one of the several Naval Ocean Surveillance System (NOSS) triple satellite formations.

NOSS Double and Triple Satellite Formations

Identical NOSS Formation Video from 2008

Excellent low-light video work!!

Thank you and best regards,
Z



posted on Mar, 28 2012 @ 09:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by DrZrD
reply to post by LastProphet527
 

I strongly suspect your triangular UFO is actually one of the several Naval Ocean Surveillance System (NOSS) triple satellite formations.

NOSS Double and Triple Satellite Formations

Identical NOSS Formation Video from 2008

Excellent low-light video work!!

Thank you and best regards,
Z



Its all smoke and mirrors.These are the counter meusures they have provided to counter what your really seeing.
edit on 28-3-2012 by LastProphet527 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 28 2012 @ 10:41 PM
link   
OP:

The "Triangular UFO" IS the NOSS triple as stated above.

You can see as they pass, stars behind them are visible. There is no solid mass here.

At the end of the video, it is not "cloaking" but the satellites are merely passing into the Earth's shadow.
That is why they lose the illumination of the sun slowly, one after the other as they all pass into the shadow.

No smoke or mirrors here, these have been seen and documented hundreds of times.

If you cannot believe this, then you have some serious misunderstandings about the technology of today.



posted on Mar, 28 2012 @ 11:05 PM
link   
I'm sorry, but I can't agree with the trio of aircraft thing. If you've seen pictures of it, such as the infamous Belgian UFO one, you'll it's all one craft as the silhouette is single and blocks out too much of the sky. Same thing with the Phoenix lights. The object, whatever it is, just blocks out too much to be a trio or multiple amount of aircraft.

However, I don't know what it is. It could be extraterrestrial, but it could also be an unusual blimp designed for stealth.

But as far as multiple aircraft in formation, no way.



posted on Mar, 29 2012 @ 02:05 AM
link   
reply to post by EvilSadamClone
 

FYI,
The world famous "Belgian Wave" triangle UFO photographs were confirmed to be hoaxed last summer, 20 years after the events in Belgium gained the worlds attention.

Belgian UFO Photo Fraud

Best regards,
Z



posted on Mar, 29 2012 @ 02:07 PM
link   
reply to post by DrZrD
 


Mr. Z, uh I mean Dr., why do you and others treat the idea of large triangle shaped AVs as being either extraterrestrial or a hoax thereof, and not being actual man made vehicles? It would not be impossible to construct a dirigible with such a shape. One that collapses and can be hid away inside a hanger. The applications are endless for such a aerial vehicle so why would there not be such a vehicle constructed? From private to government or joint efforts in creating such a vehicle is possible after all. And it could and would be kept secret for proprietary reasons. Especially if it was developed and used for broad, low and slow surveying applications in lets say surveying the surface of the globe in using ground penetrating equipment to maybe find new oil reserves. The energy and mining companies have the means to develop such a vehicle for their sole uses and make it more stealth than the stealthy-est military AVs.

Keep in mind the planet is ran by a big oil banking cartel where the USG, to just name one government, is merely a tool of a global plutocratic system made up of big oil men who keep central banks around the world stocked with cash with their major deposits (Note that central banks creating money out of nothing is a lie) which governments rely on to borrow from, or be bailed out rather, to maintain their militaries.

So ask who has the money, the motive, the means.... the power to build such a vehicle and keep it a secret? The answer is big oil. Not even the USG could pull off such a program and keep it a long time secret, but big oil does.

Also ask why do such cheesy hoaxes get so much press and when the actors admit they are?

Answer: Who makes the credit possible that funds the media.... keeps it operating.


Why should you listen to me?

Because my name is lilDudeissocool and I workout everyday.



posted on Mar, 29 2012 @ 02:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by Sovaka
Not a single Triangle UFO, but 3 craft flying in formation.





Wrong, it IS a single craft having cloaking tech from cameras on the top panels reflecting to the bottom.

Been in the air-force long enough to LAUGH at NONSENSE like that one.


Form the triangle in your head as you view it, and you can clearly see a slight distortion in the stars as the sides pass them..

edit on 29-3-2012 by HangTheTraitors because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 29 2012 @ 03:23 PM
link   
reply to post by HangTheTraitors
 


"panels?" I'm very curious to why you used that particular term...

Please liberate?
edit on 29-3-2012 by LilDudeissocool because:




posted on Mar, 29 2012 @ 03:39 PM
link   
reply to post by DrZrD
 



I'm not entirely convinced he's right.

If he can show us again, and replicate the same photo using those techniques, then I might take his word it's a fraud.

But that's the thing about these claims of frauds. If they made it a fraud then they can make it again.

But don't take this argument to mean that I am arguing in favor of ets. I apply equal standards to claims of frauds and am not willing to just dismiss something out of hand.

There's always somebody who comes out and claims they made the fraud when there is no real evidence to show that they made the fraud, but people are just all too willing to dismiss it as a fraud.

I believe the same standards to claims of alien spacecraft should be applied to those who claim it's a fraud. I want to see the evidence of it being a fraud before I will accept it as a fraud.

Until there is real evidence, I'm going to go with inconclusive.

Prove to me it's a fake, not just claim it.



posted on Mar, 29 2012 @ 03:42 PM
link   
21 April 2011, aproxamately 01:00 am. Vanderbijlpark South Africa. A massive triangular ufo was witnessed by my 24 and 26 year old niece and nephew and the dogs! Low flying, no audible noise, though it did upset the dogs.
Drop the star crap, there are triangular ufo's. If you want to say that it was a US millitary craft, then google the town. NO WAY the US will spend money to fly/spy over/on Vanderbijlpark!
The US knows how pathetic, corrupt our army has become under the new goverment.



posted on Mar, 29 2012 @ 07:11 PM
link   
Sorry, But I agree, the 3 objects are 3 individual Satellites, moving in formation. There are 13-20,000 (estimated) pieces of human technology and junk orbiting our beautiful planet. Some are big enough and shiny enough to catch the Suns rays, high above the atmosphere, and glow, twinkle, sparkle and travel across the night sky. When they travel beyond the Sun's rays, they fade out...This happens all the time, day and night.
Had the object stopped and did a right angle turn, THEN you can be worried.

Just a clarification of the 90s Belgian Black Triangles episode.

Only ONE PERSON has come forward and said his ONE FAKE PICTURE of a triangle has been published.
He FAKED it, ONLY after the Triangle flap was in progress. (obviously to be a tool).
The Belgian Black Triangle flap still occurred, and was witnessed by 100s of people.
Yes, I have seen a Real one too....They are "Our" (Earth- US GOVT) craft.



posted on Mar, 29 2012 @ 09:32 PM
link   
reply to post by LilDudeissocool
 


You are 100% correct, "It would not be impossible to construct a dirigible with such a shape (i.e. a triangle)". Nevertheless, our commercial and military experiences between the 1880's and 1950's with "lighter-than-air-craft" demonstrated beyond any doubt that it is unreliable and dangerous technology. Specifically regarding large triangles, since surface area scales with dirigible size, a large triangular dirigible could only operate in the calmest conditions making its utility very limited.

Several factors cause me to personally believe these craft can only have other-worldly origins. First, they appear to use non-conventional technology for a silent propulsion system (air resistance opposing the forward movement of a large triangle will require large and noisy conventional engines that are never heard by witnesses). Second, military secrecy practices established during Stealth development programs never involved low speed and low level flights over heavily populated areas (what people are seeing and where they see them is inconsistent with conventional wisdom). While the infamous Belgian Triangle photograph proved to be a hoax, 100's of detailed first hand witness statements prove something very unusual happened over Belgium in 1989 and 1990. Finally, close encounters with "Triangle" craft almost always involve some element of "lost-time" and other environmental effects unexplainable by the scientific principles accepted today. Too many unanswered questions demand that we must consider non-terrestrial origins for these craft.

I also believe that some organized group consistently and very deliberately introduces doubts into what otherwise could be conclusive proof of other-world visitation. For example, a quick analysis of the Belgian Triangle hoax photograph shows lens flare entirely inconsistent with a distant object, yet, this image was widely promoted as a genuine and verified UFO photograph for 20 years by the best known UFO researchers. Another example is the Phoenix triangle of 1997 where a video of obvious military flare drops is shown instead of much better available evidence.

In summary (and IMO), the overall body of evidence overwhelmingly points to the existence of strange craft employing non-conventional technologies. Nevertheless, the OP's video is almost certainly just a NOSS triplet satellite formation (100's of similar videos can be found on-line).

Thank you and best regards,
Z



posted on Mar, 29 2012 @ 10:07 PM
link   
reply to post by EvilSadamClone
 

I completely agree with your assertions, too many valid unexplained event photographs and videos are discarded as hoaxes or simply ignored because the implications are too frightening. Individuals lacking any formal forensic analysis education and experience are easy to discredit as ignorant debunkers. More difficult to discredit are established authorities who discard evidence not because it is a hoax but because it cannot be explained by what we understand today .

Never forget John Burdon Sanderson Haldane's famous quote,

“…the Universe is not only queerer than we suppose, but queerer than we can suppose.” Possible Worlds and Other Papers (1927), p. 286

Regarding the Belgian Triangle photograph, examine the lens flare from the triangle corner lights, it is inconsistent with the lens flare expected from a distant object. This is a photograph of a small model close to the camera exactly as explained by the original hoaxer.

To find real unexplainable event evidence, look for what everyone else overlooks. On YouTube, for example, skip the videos seen by 1,000’s and look for the videos seen by just a few because these often show what we cannot even imagine.

Best regards,
Z



posted on Mar, 29 2012 @ 11:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by DrZrD
reply to post by LilDudeissocool
 


You are 100% correct, "It would not be impossible to construct a dirigible with such a shape (i.e. a triangle)". Nevertheless, our commercial and military experiences between the 1880's and 1950's with "lighter-than-air-craft" demonstrated beyond any doubt that it is unreliable and dangerous technology. Specifically regarding large triangles, since surface area scales with dirigible size, a large triangular dirigible could only operate in the calmest conditions making its utility very limited.


With enough directed thrust with a winged aerodynamic design you can make such a dirigible stable enough to compete in the air with any modern heavy aircraft, B-52, 747, you name it with the exception of top speed performance.

You can make a model of one. I will give you enough information on how to construct one, and if it fails in trials to be comparable to heavy aircraft flight characteristics I will be more than happy to reimburse all your material, fabrication and farmed out assembly costs back to you.


Originally posted by DrZrD Several factors cause me to personally believe these craft can only have other-worldly origins. First, they appear to use non-conventional technology for a silent propulsion system (air resistance opposing the forward movement of a large triangle will require large and noisy conventional engines that are never heard by witnesses).


A. "Other-worldly origins?" WHAT? Listen, you write very well. I mean very well. By just reading how you write that you have a very high IQ to say the very least. So I simply do not buy into the idea you actually believe the statement you gave directly above.

B. "Witnesses?" You mean so called witnesses where it's reasonable to assume the majority have a high probability making up their accounts. However... I will continue with C in further comments lending credibility to a very small possible minority of actual witnesses to flights of said described AV.

C. There are virtually silent turbines. The only thing you can hear is rushing air and a low pitch hum. This standing within the nearest safest distance possible away from the nozzle. Ever taken a tour at GE's Peebles Ohio facility when they have an open house? They love showing off their near silent engines. Also the amount of airflow in the direction of vehicle movement creates an extreme low local pressure over the leading surface.


Originally posted by DrZrD Second, military secrecy practices established during Stealth development programs never involved low speed and low level flights over heavily populated areas (what people are seeing and where they see them is inconsistent with conventional wisdom).


Right, if it's not DoD, or at least declassified DoD documented it doesn't exist. LoL

There is a much larger world out there and big oil and its central banking apparatuses, plural, fund and therefore run governments including ours. They can do what they want including having more advanced toys than DoD can play with.


Originally posted by DrZrD While the infamous Belgian Triangle photograph proved to be a hoax, 100's of detailed first hand witness statements prove something very unusual happened over Belgium in 1989 and 1990. Finally, close encounters with "Triangle" craft almost always involve some element of "lost-time" and other environmental effects unexplainable by the scientific principles accepted today. Too many unanswered questions demand that we must consider non-terrestrial origins for these craft.


That's all nonsense. Sorry, but it is. I at least believe it is, so that part is moot from my perspective.


Originally posted by DrZrD I also believe that some organized group consistently and very deliberately introduces doubts into what otherwise could be conclusive proof of other-world visitation. For example, a quick analysis of the Belgian Triangle hoax photograph shows lens flare entirely inconsistent with a distant object, yet, this image was widely promoted as a genuine and verified UFO photograph for 20 years by the best known UFO researchers. Another example is the Phoenix triangle of 1997 where a video of obvious military flare drops is shown instead of much better available evidence.


Yep. Dig you on your point made. However I can assure you it's a big oil counter industrial intel program, and that's all it is.


Originally posted by DrZrD In summary (and IMO), the overall body of evidence overwhelmingly points to the existence of strange craft employing non-conventional technologies.
That's correct, it's non conventional, it's cutting edge.

I'm almost out of characters so I'll post on in a following post.




edit on 30-3-2012 by LilDudeissocool because: I ran out of space and went back and did some consolidating.



posted on Mar, 30 2012 @ 12:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by DrZrD
Nevertheless, the OP's video is almost certainly just a NOSS triplet satellite formation (100's of similar videos can be found on-line).

Thank you and best regards,
Z




Yepper.



posted on Mar, 30 2012 @ 12:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by LilDudeissocool
reply to post by HangTheTraitors
 


"panels?" I'm very curious to why you used that particular term...

Please liberate?
edit on 29-3-2012 by LilDudeissocool because:



I may have gotten too cute with my lil Dude baby talk when I originally posted my content to you above, HangTheTraitors, "liberate" should be "elaborate" just to be clearer.


Sorry.
edit on 30-3-2012 by LilDudeissocool because: I added "Sorry" apology.



posted on Mar, 30 2012 @ 01:32 AM
link   
reply to post by LilDudeissocool
 


Regarding the feasibility of triangular craft based on dirigible technology, I have these last thoughts to share. Aerodynamic stability at speed is expected since lift is proportional to airspeed squared (Bernoulli's equation) and due to overall aircraft inertial considerations. Nevertheless, this same velocity squared dependence makes an air-foil based craft very unstable at low speeds (the reason why all fixed wing aircraft take-off into the wind). IMO, I do not believe a "lighter-than-air" large frame air-foil shaped triangle craft could ever progress beyond a novelty. I also, IMO, do not believe a craft of this design will be operationally more effective than well established alternative technologies.

Regarding my other thoughts; our world is not only stranger than we imagine, but stranger than we can imagine**. This rabbit hole goes far deeper than anyone would believe, so I will save my words for another day.

Best regards,
Z

**“…the Universe is not only queerer than we suppose, but queerer than we can suppose.” Possible Worlds and Other Papers, John Burdon Sanderson Haldane (1927), p. 286






top topics



 
1
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join