I don't truly care to break down the geometry of this idea, rather is should be self-evident(in a way)
So... lets begin with MIT's grand idea...
Lets think, has this idea ever been thought of, in a similar fashion...(power of the sun)?
Archimedes Tower of Mirrors
www.livescience.com...
What shape should the solar cells be?
Hexagon...
There are two possible explanations for the reason that honeycomb is composed of hexagons, rather than any other shape. One, given by Jan Brożek and
proved much later by Thomas Hales, is that the hexagon tiles the plane with minimal surface area. Thus, a hexagonal structure uses the least material
to create a lattice of cells within a given volume.
en.wikipedia.org...
Can the hexagon fit to a multitude of shapes?
yes...
Should they be flat, and the plane be square with the sun?
No, for the MIT design reiterates this...
But they use squares... here's why not...
In principal...
Then how to organize them?
BTW that is to be the face of the cells, not to replicate the entire 3d structure, rather.... tile the tower with this design.
Old school version of this idea...
How should the towers be arranged?
Nature has already shown the best designs!
STOP TRYING TO BE BETTER THAN MOTHER EARTH, adopt her means and be one!
Oh and BTW... Charlie Sheen is still 'Winning'
This is not even close to the entirety of the design, but should give a pretty good understanding.
Debate it!
edit on 28-3-2012 by MESSAGEFROMTHESTARS because: additional statement
edit on 28-3-2012 by MESSAGEFROMTHESTARS
because: remove broken link to image