Building 6?? What happened?

YOU Again?
I thought youd be along shortly.........
Lets see your pictures of said food court........nuff said.

Interesting, never heard this one before. And clearly you can see from the photo on the left on this pagewww.911studies.com... from the website you've posted a smoke plume rising from close to street level, well below both impact sites of towers one and two. Maybe there was a steak burning in that food court!

Originally posted by BigBossWorm
Interesting, never heard this one before. And clearly you can see from the photo on the left on this pagewww.911studies.com... from the website you've posted a smoke plume rising from close to street level, well below both impact sites of towers one and two. Maybe there was a steak burning in that food court!

That's the other tower falling. An optical illusion makes it look as though both towers are still standing and that website lies about the time. Why I don't know.

reply to post by TrickoftheShade


So, it's the tower falling from the bottom first, with the smoke and dust to one side only where building 6 is, no where else I can see the dust etc?

Originally posted by myss427
reply to post by TrickoftheShade

 

So, it's the tower falling from the bottom first, with the smoke and dust to one side only where building 6 is, no where else I can see the dust etc?

What do you mean falling from the bottom first? How can you tell, given that the collapse is all but over? The photograph, it goes without saying, is from a specific moment. Seconds later the dust was everywhere.

You are being misled by charlatans. Probably because they make money out of it in some way or another.

reply to post by TrickoftheShade


In that picture it clearly shows both towers standing, but at the base of building 6 there is a large explosion or dust cloud emiting from one direction only, therefor concluding either building 6 is exploding or that tower is colapsing at the base causing the dust cloud.

reply to post by TrickoftheShade


Optical illusion? Seriously? That's on a par with "holographic planes". I suppose both sides have their fringe elements....

This is the same Jack White that has/had a site claiming Apollo was faked.
The tv show Mythbusters took him to task and showed he's nothing but BS.

reply to post by stirling


If so, tell us why building 6 didn't collapse.

Ah...

So you see it is all a fantasy.

Originally posted by stirling
YOU Again?
I thought youd be along shortly.........
Lets see your pictures of said food court........nuff said.

I can do better than that- If you pick up a copy of Joel Meyweowitz' book AFTERMATH you can look at them all day. He was physically there documenting the cleanup of ground zero and he took an enormous number of photos of what the wreckage looked like. I myself can't photocopy the page because it's a coffee table book and it's just so flipping huge.

I'be been saying for a long time that if you truthers would only stop squandering your money on Richard Gage's conferences and those fifteen versions of Loose Change and look into what the real people who were actually there saw, 98% of your questions would have been answered already. I mean look at this very thread- it's been known that building 6 had an open court in the center of the building all this time and yet you're still wondering about the "mysterious crater" over ten years later. Hechk, you don't even wait to ask "why is there a big hole there" before you go into your "bombs planted by sinister secret boogeymen" routine.

'Nuff said.

reply to post by TrickoftheShade


You're right. The south tower has collapsed at that point and the author of the website lied about the time of that picture.

I agree. This is just a lie concerning the time of the photo, by the charlatan who hosts that website. Moving along...

Originally posted by myss427
reply to post by TrickoftheShade

 

In that picture it clearly shows both towers standing, but at the base of building 6 there is a large explosion or dust cloud emiting from one direction only, therefor concluding either building 6 is exploding or that tower is colapsing at the base causing the dust cloud.

Both towers aren't standing. It's a very slight optical illusion. Look at the entry points for the 'planes' - they are at the top. But the second plane hit much further down.

Originally posted by Flatcoat
reply to post by TrickoftheShade

 

Optical illusion? Seriously? That's on a par with "holographic planes". I suppose both sides have their fringe elements....

I refer you to what I wrote above. Unless you think both planes hit near the top it's clearly a very minor optical illusion in a bad photo. Why that should be surprising to you I don't know.

There is footage from the piers across the river taken by a camera man of the buildings....
It too shows multiple explosions as well as the plume of dust rising from the street while both buildings still stand....the film continues to the fall of #2then #1....
then #7.....
Ill try to refind it as well.......
If there was a great gaping 8 story hole in the #6 all the way from ground to 8 story glass roof ill be
glad to admit it...Im not choosey what turns up as facts....just that the facts turn up.....
The mystery of 9/11 is probably the most important event that we need to know the truth about...unequivocably the truth...withpout self exculpatories or excuses.
There are documents which are still secret. evidence never yet seen....testimony not publicly heard by all....
And the truth is farther from the people with every passing day...............
This is a truth the whole world needs to know.....................

From what I've seen building 6 was destroyed at the same time the south tower went down, I can't tell exactly if its because the debris hit it or its simply erupting from within. It left a very circular hole though which kinda suggests it was blown rather than damaged from debris.

reply to post by Insolubrious


WTC 6 destroyed ...? By South Tower collapse...?

Look again

Check out clips 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

www.911myths.com...

As camera pans showing fires in south side of WTC 7 will see WTC 6 in right foreground

Clips 5 and 6 show clear shots of WTC 6 in right foregound, badly damaged, but still standing

You lose again.....

Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by Insolubrious

 

WTC 6 destroyed ...? By South Tower collapse...?

Look again

Check out clips 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

www.911myths.com...

As camera pans showing fires in south side of WTC 7 will see WTC 6 in right foreground

Clips 5 and 6 show clear shots of WTC 6 in right foregound, badly damaged, but still standing

You lose again.....

lol whatever, I was referring to the top being blown out, building 6 didn't come down completely until they pulled it.

Originally posted by GoodOlDave

Originally posted by stirling
YOU Again?
I thought youd be along shortly.........
Lets see your pictures of said food court........nuff said.

I can do better than that- If you pick up a copy of Joel Meyweowitz' book AFTERMATH you can look at them all day. He was physically there documenting the cleanup of ground zero and he took an enormous number of photos of what the wreckage looked like. I myself can't photocopy the page because it's a coffee table book and it's just so flipping huge.

Dave, if you want some real information why don't you try buying yourself a couple of terrabytes of digital storage like I have and downloading the FOIA 911 dataset archives, go and study that and come back to me. The pictures in your book are probably 0.1% of the content available at this website.

911datasets.org...

Originally posted by Insolubrious
Dave, if you want some real information why don't you try buying yourself a couple of terrabytes of digital storage like I have and downloading the FOIA 911 dataset archives, go and study that and come back to me. The pictures in your book are probably 0.1% of the content available at this website.

I have two 500 gig NAS drives on my home network, actually, one for my MP3 collection and the other for general file storage, but this is neither here nor there. What am I looking for that photographs taken by someone who was standing right inside WTC 6 wouldn't show?