It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ImaFungi
reply to post by Rocketman7
I kind of just asked because i was wondering if it is possible for man to physically create something without using atoms,,
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by rwfresh
Originally posted by jiggerj
Wow! Good job in keeping with the topic. You just verbally vomited a whole bunch of nothing there. Wow! When you talk about proof of an afterlife are you talking about near death experiences where the oxygen depletion in the brain causes weird dreams? Gawd I hope not.edit on 4/1/2012 by jiggerj because: (no reason given)edit on 4/1/2012 by jiggerj because: (no reason given)
Another ignorant parishioner proselytizing from the pews of the Church of Science! Have fun!
Another adult child that goes around saying, JUST BELIEVE WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER! MAGIC IS REAL! WOOD NYMPHS AND UNICORNS ARE REAL! JUST BELIEVE IT!
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by ImaFungi
reply to post by Rocketman7
I kind of just asked because i was wondering if it is possible for man to physically create something without using atoms,,
Would magnifying light count? I don't know if atoms are involved when we magnify and focus lightwaves to burn a hole through a piece of paper.
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by smithjustinb
Vibrations of what? Quantum foam made up of what? 1d strings of what? Massive clumps of what? Everyone seems to be missing the point of my inquiry.
LOL I don't think we're missing the point. You want to lead us to an answer of a god, and it just doesn't fit. It's not reasonable. Just as you've been asking what is an atom, what is quantum foam, a god would still qualify as a Something that should make you obligated to ask what is a god made of.
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by ImaFungi
reply to post by Rocketman7
I kind of just asked because i was wondering if it is possible for man to physically create something without using atoms,,
Would magnifying light count? I don't know if atoms are involved when we magnify and focus lightwaves to burn a hole through a piece of paper.
WOULD THIS BE SOME KIND OF NEW FANGLED MAGNIFYING GLASSS MADE FROM SOMETHING OTHER THAN atoms?
Originally posted by Glass
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by ImaFungi
reply to post by Rocketman7
I kind of just asked because i was wondering if it is possible for man to physically create something without using atoms,,
Would magnifying light count? I don't know if atoms are involved when we magnify and focus lightwaves to burn a hole through a piece of paper.
Not sure if trolling or... doesn't matter, for some reason I feel compelled to explain this to you.
By "magnifying light" I assume you are refering to the act of using a magnifying glass to focus light. The concave shape of the magnifying glass causes the light which passes through it to converge on a point (focal point). At this point there is sufficient heat to induce combustion in (burn) paper, which is a chemical reaction. In a chemical reaction, molecules (structures made of atoms) break apart and bond to form other molecules. The molecules of the paper change into ash and smoke. No atoms are created or destroyed, they merely change position.edit on 3/4/2012 by Glass because: derped on one word
Because thease people dont exsist. Theres not one person on the planet alive or dead or yet to be born whom could easilty explain things such as the workings of the universe Its reason for existance and or how it all came into being. Youd get as much sence asking a single celled amomeba to explain Einsteins theory of realativity.It couldnt an neither can we ever hope to explain reality as we perseive it.But thease Theoretical PHYSICISTS. no a good gig when they get one an love those grant moneys that can fill there pockets an let them build big expensive toys like particle acceleraters ect Did you know theve even built a particle accelerater underneath the Lourve in Paris.Wish I could get my hands on some of that theoretical grant money .The moneys real B T Y an the theorys are just conjecture.Id like about 5 billion pounds to study my theory that we all live in a yellow submarine.
Originally posted by ImaFungi
reply to post by Rocketman7
why cant those who easily understand the way of reality/physical universe, explain to those who arent as superioir and blessed? so physicists know exactly what happened? the big bang is true, and they understand reality? why are there any problems on earth then, why dont we all work together and live in peace and cooperate and innovate,,,
.Acording to M THEORY OR MEMBRAIN THEORY THERE ARE 10 DIMENSIONS, or 9 if you discount time as being a dimension. Both M theory an supersring theoey say there must be at least 10 dimensions. An some radical grant scroungers otherwise known as theoretical Pysicisits postulate there an infinite amount of dimensions an also universes.Give me a couple of million euros an I shall think on this an publish a paper or even write a thesis.Or get my long legged secretery to print it up for me.Hey why do your own work with that kind of money you can hire minions to do all the hard work.Im the ideas man oops a mean theory man.
Originally posted by Rocketman7
Ok so let me add one more point. Because some people do not have the wiring to be able to think in 4 dimensions their view of the world is bound to be different from those who can, but wait, there's a 5th dimension as well, and not only is there a 5th dimension, but many people are as aware of it, as the rest are of their 3.