FBI's entrapment scheme exposed by suspect, so they grab him the very next day., page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 88 times
Topic started on 28-3-2012 @ 06:38 AM by gladtobehere
Khalifah al-Akili emailed the Guardian shortly before his arrest to say he thought he was the target of an 'entrapment' sting

Khalifah al-Akili, 34, was arrested in a police raid on his home on March 15. He was later charged with illegally possessing a gun after having previous felony convictions for drug dealing. However, at his court appearance an FBI agent testified that al-Akili had made radical Islamic statements and that police had uncovered unspecified jihadist literature at his home.

Yet, despite being painted in court as a dangerous radical Islamist, the only charges brought against al-Akili were for firing a rifle...

But, in a strange twist, al-Akili's arrest came just days after he had sent out an email to friends and local Muslim civil rights groups complaining that he believed he was the target of an FBI "entrapment" sting.

In the email – which was also sent to the Guardian before al-Akili was arrested – he detailed meeting two men he believed were FBI informants because of the way they talked about radical Islam and appeared to want to get him to make jihadist statements. According to his account, one of them, who called himself Saeed Torres, asked him to buy a gun. Al-Aikili said he refused. The other, who was called Mohammed, offered to help him go to Pakistan for possible Islamic radical training. Al-Akili also refused.

Al-Akili concluded his email by saying: "I would like to pursue a legal action against the FBI due to their continuous harassment and attempts to set me up." The Guardian contacted al-Akili by email and on March 14 by phone and al-Akili agreed to talk more to the Guardian about his belief that he was being set up by Hussain. But he was arrested the next day and has been denied bail as a potential threat to the public, keeping him in jail.

Al-Akili's lawyer Mike Healey believes that the FBI may have been monitoring al-Akili's emails, and possibly his phone, and then rushed to arrest him once Hussain had been identified and al-Akili had effectively gone public with his fears.

So let me get this straight. The FBI using the exact same tactics as before, offers to "train and arm" the suspect. Realizing that this is a setup, the suspect sends out a blast e-mail to the media and makes some phone calls detailing his suspicions.

What happens next, the FBI grabs him...

They charge him with a gun crime but portray him as a "dangerous terrorist" because of "Jihadist literature"... wonder what that was, the US Constitution?

Isnt it obvious that this is complete BS? They never hesitate to scream about alleged plots with headline grabbing details. Instead they make some obscure reference to "Jihadist literature"? Guess they need time to manufacture, I mean, sort out the evidence...

Coincidentally (yah right), this case has not been mentioned anywhere.


reply posted on 28-3-2012 @ 06:52 AM by gladtobehere
reply to post by smyleegrl


Good question. Many of the so called terrorists seem to be near mentally handicapped.

Will be interesting to see what comes of this.

The US government's credibility is already in the toilet. Unfortunately, I think they're going to make an example out of this guy.



reply posted on 28-3-2012 @ 06:56 AM by Flavian
reply to post by smyleegrl



Maybe because people were trying to get him to make radical statements and buy a gun? That would make me suspicious too.

If true, this is a total abuse of powers. Agents should be locked up for effectively providing false testament and committing perjury.

I have never understood though how entrapment could ever be considered legal?


reply posted on 28-3-2012 @ 07:09 AM by JudgeDeath
reply to post by gladtobehere


FBI "Wanna buy a gun"

Stooge "Er no!"

FBI "Wanna know how to become a terrorist?"

Stooge "Er no!"

FBI *tac*tac* "Sir we have a warrant for your arrest!"

Stooge "What have I done?"

FBI "Sir...what is this?"

Stooge "My Quran...!"

FBI "Sir you're under arrest for being in possession of "Jihadist literature"


reply posted on 28-3-2012 @ 07:45 AM by xXxinfidelxXx
reply to post by gladtobehere



Well, didn't ya know? They need terrorists for this whole farcicle War on Terrorism to sound credible. Now, seeing that the terrorism pool seems to be on the wane, one could see how that could hurt their credibility. So they pull crap like this, trying to trap honest people into their little schtick. It makes me sick, to be quite honest with you.


reply posted on 28-3-2012 @ 10:16 AM by smyleegrl
reply to post by GD21D



Excellent points, and thanks for the no flames!

If these were agents of any organization, what they did is wrong. I didn't mean to imply that the behavior was excusable.

Isn't there a law against entrapment?


reply posted on 28-3-2012 @ 11:48 AM by eazyriderl_l
reply to post by gladtobehere



what do you expect when we have things like this coming to light www.abovetopsecret.com... and we will still do nothing. These guys will get prosecuted as soon as the bankers who orchestrated our economic destruction get prosecuted.
That being said I dont hold much hope for this country, its' citizenry, or our future on this planet.


reply posted on 28-3-2012 @ 01:13 PM by JizzyMcButter
reply to post by smyleegrl



It's not really a "false flag" in the sense that something happened
It's a "controlled reaction" in the sense that they wanted to set him up and bust him before anything happened
This approach accomplishes two goals at the same time. Make people scared, and make them think the FBI is capable of protecting us before bad things happen.


reply posted on 28-3-2012 @ 01:24 PM by gladtobehere
reply to post by smyleegrl


There have been many complaints of entrapment in the past, almost every case if I remember correctly.

One could argue that its a typical defense but lets be honest. In order to perpetuate fear and justify the domestic police state, the government has to keep catching "bad guys".


reply posted on 28-3-2012 @ 02:24 PM by Swills
reply to post by gladtobehere



This wouldn't be the first time the FBI has "stopped" their own homegrown terrorists, and they always make themselves out to be the heroes who saved the day yet again.....




reply posted on 28-3-2012 @ 02:31 PM by AutOmatIc
reply to post by gladtobehere



Let me get this straight. A FELON is arrested for illegally possessing a gun...and despite the attempts to paint him to be a dangerous terrorist, the only charges brought against him were for firing the rifle?

Where's the problem, it sounds like the system actually worked for once?

It's not like they forced this guy at gun point to fire the weapon that he cannot legally be in possession of due to the fact that he's a felon, so why did he fire it?

edit on 28-3-2012 by AutOmatIc because: spelling

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^