It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by hanyak69
This is a question I have, and laugh if you must. How did they get such perfect pictures with the equipment they had? I also question angles, if Mr Armstrong was the first astronaut on the moon then who was running the camera that was outside the lander of him stepping off of the ladder? Not one head cutoff in the pictures, it is amazing how everything is center in the frames of the photos, all done from the chest cameras.
Originally posted by ypperst
reply to post by blocula
One simple question for you: How dumb do you think the Russians are?
Russia and USA was in a battle, to get to the moon first. So don't you think that Russian did every bit they could, to see if they actually did it? If they caught USA in hoaxing, the Russians would be very glad, but they didn't. They saw USA hit the moon first, simple as that.
And by the way, my stepdad was following the shuttle via radio signals. And as soon they were behind the moon, the signal stopped. There was a straight line of connection to Denmark, since the moon was over our heads that day. So if they just traveled around earth, (as they would, if they weren't going to the moon) the connection would have interrupted as soon the spaceship broke the connection. - But they never did, only when they went behind the moon.
I can even draw you a picture, to see how simple it is. For me, that is enough proof that they did go to the moon.
f Mr Armstrong was the first astronaut on the moon then who was running the camera that was outside the lander of him stepping off of the ladder?
Theres no atmosphere in space and theres no atmosphere on on the moon and the moon is close to the sun like we are and yet amazingly...
Originally posted by jra
Originally posted by blocula
The van allen belt that surrounds the earth has been described as being impenetrable by humans and man made machines because of very large amounts of very deadly radiation...
Who exactly describes them as being impenetrable? Dr. James Van Allen, the discoverer of the belts sure didn't, nor has any other scientists. So who makes that claim and where is the evidence?
Try going up far beyond the earths atmosphere and you'll be within temperatures that are -455 degrees below zero and you'll be instantly turned into frozen dust and nearly all molecular motion ceases at those kinds of extreme temperatues.Absolute zero is -459.67 degrees below zero...
Wow...
There is this thing in the center of our solar system. It's a star, we call the "Sun". It warms up all the planets, moons, comets and other objects (like space ships and satellites) in our solar system. Obviously the further out you go, the less heat you'll absorb. But nothing freezes instantly like you're claiming.
You really have no idea how temperature (and a number of other things) work in space, even though others have explained to you already numerous times in another thread. You clearly wish to remain ignorant and that's just sad.edit on 28-3-2012 by jra because: (no reason given)
No, i believe both the US and USSR Space Programs were real, i am just saying lay off the gang bashing, just because someone has a theory.
Originally posted by FugitiveSoul
reply to post by daaskapital
So the Russian Space race was bull$h!t too then? According to the op, this is the case.
edit on 28-3-2012 by FugitiveSoul because: (no reason given)
I bring up Americans because any poster who starts a thread which goes against the USA's accepted belief or the American norm is gang bashed and subjected to near Online harrassment. While this thread has not reached that circumstance, there have been a few which have. Someone should have free speech without being bashed by people having opposing ideologies.
Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by daaskapital
Why do you bring up Americans? This is about sensible conspiracy theorists vs. conspiracy nuts. I am no American, yet I think this OPs hypothesising is absurd.
In other words,there never were any astronauts walking around on the moon,they would have burned and froze,
which would'nt have allowed them and their spaceships to pass through the extreme radiation of the van allen belts either...
Thanx for posting a "moon hoax" link,it shows just how well tptb are able to doctor up and alter new and old photographs using todays digital high tech and make them "appear" even better and more "believable" then the old ever were before and the new ones are just as un "believable" to me...
Originally posted by choos
Originally posted by blocula
We did? okay then,prove we went to the moon,see,it cant be done and the van allen belt is not overrated,its deadly radiation and theres actually two of them > en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by choos
Originally posted by blocula
reply to post by NuminousCosmos
Imo,no one went to the moon and no one walked upon the moon either and so why wouldnt everything else about our space program also be a hoax and a lie?
we went to the moon. the van allen belt is overrated, your cold brittle theory is bunk this close to the sun.edit on 28-3-2012 by blocula because: (no reason given)
you probably wont believe me if i linked the hi-res photos of the lunar lander module on the moon with the footsteps/trails visible anyway.
www.nasa.gov...
the van allen belt radiation is neglible for the amount of time astronauts spend passing through it.
spacemath.gsfc.nasa.gov...
you most likely will not believe this link neither i dont think, not really sure why im bothering.
I'm not talking about mt everest,i'm talking about the moon,the 240,000 miles away moon...
Originally posted by Illustronic
It's impossible to say how many people have reached Everest's summit at any given time, since the number changes every year. At the end of the 2010 climbing season, 3,142 different climbers from twenty different countries had completed a total of over 5,100 climbs. 219 people have died on the mountain, it isn't a stretch to say only 500 people have climbed Mt. Everest and lived to tell about it. Therefore using Bocula logic, there is a one in 140,000,000 chance that the summit of Mt. Everest doesn't even exit! Are you just going to believe what they tell you?
Originally posted by blocula
Theres so much evidence that points to the fact that we never even went to the moon,i wont bother getting into all of those well known details...
Nasa's main reason for claiming to have gone to the moon and walking upon its surface,was for use as a power tripping psych-ops against the russians during the cold war and for massive public support while funneling massive amounts of money to be use for other nefarious reasons, like building massive underground blast proof bunkers for tptb and the government institution known as nasa is a department of the executive branch and ultimately only has to answer to the president of the united states and the publics opinion,from pre-arranged media induced lies,is that nasa is an open scientific institution,but the truth is that nasa was created in 1958 as a part of the department of defense...
Originally posted by yourmaker
why didn't the Russians ever go to the moon?